IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v28y2017i1d10.1007_s10845-014-0974-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simultaneous optimization of repair and control-limit policy in condition-based maintenance

Author

Listed:
  • Sayyideh Mehri Mousavi

    (Tafresh University)

  • Hesam Shams

    (University of Tennessee)

  • Shahrzad Ahmadi

    (University of Houston)

Abstract

In condition-based maintenance (CBM) planning, collected information from system condition monitoring is the basis of making decision about conducting the maintenance and repair activities. Recently, ample number of studies has been conducted in CBM field especially, in control-limit policy. In control-limit policy, using proportional Hazards model and results of monitoring system condition, one can estimate hazard rate function and its condition’s transition probability matrix. Then, considering replacement costs, optimal control-limit can be determined minimizing the average cost in the long run. The presented model considers repair policy and their implementation cost, and the assumptions of repair during interval inspection is ignored. Then, a model is presented to determine the optimal control-limit and the best repair policy, in which the average total cost per unit time in the long-run, is minimized. At the end, a numerical example is illustrated.

Suggested Citation

  • Sayyideh Mehri Mousavi & Hesam Shams & Shahrzad Ahmadi, 2017. "Simultaneous optimization of repair and control-limit policy in condition-based maintenance," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 245-254, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:28:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s10845-014-0974-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-014-0974-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-014-0974-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-014-0974-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Love, C. E. & Zhang, Z. G. & Zitron, M. A. & Guo, R., 2000. "A discrete semi-Markov decision model to determine the optimal repair/replacement policy under general repairs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 398-409, September.
    2. W Wang, 2003. "Modelling condition monitoring intervals: A hybrid of simulation and analytical approaches," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(3), pages 273-282, March.
    3. Chen, Dongyan & Trivedi, Kishor S., 2005. "Optimization for condition-based maintenance with semi-Markov decision process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 25-29.
    4. V. Makis & X. Jiang & K. Cheng, 2000. "Optimal Preventive Replacement Under Minimal Repair and Random Repair Cost," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 141-156, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Najafi, Seyedvahid & Zheng, Rui & Lee, Chi-Guhn, 2021. "An optimal opportunistic maintenance policy for a two-unit series system with general repair using proportional hazards models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    2. A. S. Xanthopoulos & S. Vlastos & D. E. Koulouriotis, 2022. "Coordinating production, inspection and maintenance decisions in a stochastic manufacturing system with deterioration failures," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 5707-5732, November.
    3. Edson Ruschel & Eduardo Alves Portela Santos & Eduardo de Freitas Rocha Loures, 2020. "Establishment of maintenance inspection intervals: an application of process mining techniques in manufacturing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 53-72, January.
    4. Zheng, Rui & Chen, Bingkun & Gu, Liudong, 2020. "Condition-based maintenance with dynamic thresholds for a system using the proportional hazards model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    5. Zheng, Rui & Zhou, Yifan, 2021. "Comparison of three preventive maintenance warranty policies for products deteriorating with age and a time-varying covariate," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    6. Zheng, Rui & Wang, Jingjing & Zhang, Yingzhi, 2023. "A hybrid repair-replacement policy in the proportional hazards model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(3), pages 1011-1021.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Xueqing & Gao, Hui, 2012. "Road maintenance optimization through a discrete-time semi-Markov decision process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 110-119.
    2. Zengqiang Jiang & Dragan Banjevic & Mingcheng E & Bing Li, 2017. "Optimizing the re-profiling policy regarding metropolitan train wheels based on a semi-Markov decision process," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(5), pages 495-507, October.
    3. Kim, Michael Jong & Jiang, Rui & Makis, Viliam & Lee, Chi-Guhn, 2011. "Optimal Bayesian fault prediction scheme for a partially observable system subject to random failure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 331-339, October.
    4. Guo R. & Ascher H. & Love E., 2001. "Towards Practical and Synthetical Modelling of Repairable Systems," Stochastics and Quality Control, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 147-182, January.
    5. J Ansell & T Archibald & J Dagpunar & L Thomas & P Abell & D Duncalf, 2003. "Analysing maintenance data to gain insight into systems performance," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(4), pages 343-349, April.
    6. Dehayem Nodem, F.I. & Kenné, J.P. & Gharbi, A., 2011. "Simultaneous control of production, repair/replacement and preventive maintenance of deteriorating manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 271-282, November.
    7. Huixia Huo, 2024. "Optimal Corrective Maintenance Policies via an Availability-Cost Hybrid Factor for Software Aging Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, February.
    8. Dimitrakos, T.D. & Kyriakidis, E.G., 2008. "A semi-Markov decision algorithm for the maintenance of a production system with buffer capacity and continuous repair times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 752-762, February.
    9. Zhao, Yunfei & Huang, Linan & Smidts, Carol & Zhu, Quanyan, 2020. "Finite-horizon semi-Markov game for time-sensitive attack response and probabilistic risk assessment in nuclear power plants," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    10. Zhou, Zhi-Jie & Hu, Chang-Hua & Xu, Dong-Ling & Chen, Mao-Yin & Zhou, Dong-Hua, 2010. "A model for real-time failure prognosis based on hidden Markov model and belief rule base," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 269-283, November.
    11. Panagiotidou, S. & Tagaras, G., 2012. "Optimal integrated process control and maintenance under general deterioration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 58-70.
    12. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    13. Alberto Reyes & L. Enrique Sucar & Pablo H. Ibargüengoytia & Eduardo F. Morales, 2020. "Planning Under Uncertainty Applications in Power Plants Using Factored Markov Decision Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, May.
    14. Olde Keizer, Minou & Teunter, Ruud, 2014. "Opportunistic condition-based maintenance and aperiodic inspections for a two-unit series system," Research Report 14033-OPERA, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    15. Yonghui Huang & Xianping Guo & Xinyuan Song, 2011. "Performance Analysis for Controlled Semi-Markov Systems with Application to Maintenance," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 395-415, August.
    16. Ferreira, Rodrigo J.P. & de Almeida, Adiel Teixeira & Cavalcante, Cristiano A.V., 2009. "A multi-criteria decision model to determine inspection intervals of condition monitoring based on delay time analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(5), pages 905-912.
    17. Epaminondas G. Kyriakidis & Theodosis D. Dimitrakos, 2005. "Computation of the Optimal Policy for the Control of a Compound Immigration Process through Total Catastrophes," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 97-118, March.
    18. A H Shirmohammadi & C E Love & Z G Zhang, 2003. "An optimal maintenance policy for skipping imminent preventive maintenance for systems experiencing random failures," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(1), pages 40-47, January.
    19. Girish Kumar & Vipul Jain & Umang Soni, 2019. "Modelling and simulation of repairable mechanical systems reliability and availability," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(5), pages 1221-1233, October.
    20. Yi Ding & Anatoly Lisnianski & Ilia Frenkel & Lev Khvatskin, 2009. "Optimal corrective maintenance contract planning for aging multi‐state system," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 612-631, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:28:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s10845-014-0974-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.