IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joheur/v27y2021i1d10.1007_s10732-019-09433-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The convex hull heuristic for nonlinear integer programming problems with linear constraints and application to quadratic 0–1 problems

Author

Listed:
  • Monique Guignard

    (University of Pennsylvania)

  • Aykut Ahlatcioglu

    (University of Pennsylvania)

Abstract

The convex hull heuristic is a heuristic for mixed-integer programming problems with a nonlinear objective function and linear constraints. It is a matheuristic in two ways: it is based on the mathematical programming algorithm called simplicial decomposition, or SD (von Hohenbalken in Math Program 13:49–68, 1977), and at each iteration, one solves a mixed-integer programming problem with a linear objective function and the original constraints, and a continuous problem with a nonlinear objective function and a single linear constraint. Its purpose is to produce quickly feasible and often near optimal or optimal solutions for convex and nonconvex problems. It is usually multi-start. We have tested it on a number of hard quadratic 0–1 optimization problems and present numerical results for generalized quadratic assignment problems, cross-dock door assignment problems, quadratic assignment problems and quadratic knapsack problems. We compare solution quality and solution times with results from the literature, when possible.

Suggested Citation

  • Monique Guignard & Aykut Ahlatcioglu, 2021. "The convex hull heuristic for nonlinear integer programming problems with linear constraints and application to quadratic 0–1 problems," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 251-265, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joheur:v:27:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10732-019-09433-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s10732-019-09433-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10732-019-09433-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10732-019-09433-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Monique Guignard, 2003. "Lagrangean relaxation," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 11(2), pages 151-200, December.
    2. Alberto Caprara & David Pisinger & Paolo Toth, 1999. "Exact Solution of the Quadratic Knapsack Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 125-137, May.
    3. Aykut Ahlatçıoğlu & Michael Bussieck & Mustafa Esen & Monique Guignard & Jan-Hendrick Jagla & Alexander Meeraus, 2012. "Combining QCR and CHR for convex quadratic pure 0–1 programming problems with linear constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 199(1), pages 33-49, October.
    4. Marguerite Frank & Philip Wolfe, 1956. "An algorithm for quadratic programming," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1‐2), pages 95-110, March.
    5. Mauricio G. C. Resende & K. G. Ramakrishnan & Zvi Drezner, 1995. "Computing Lower Bounds for the Quadratic Assignment Problem with an Interior Point Algorithm for Linear Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(5), pages 781-791, October.
    6. Jean-François Cordeau & Manlio Gaudioso & Gilbert Laporte & Luigi Moccia, 2006. "A Memetic Heuristic for the Generalized Quadratic Assignment Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 433-443, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caprara, Alberto, 2008. "Constrained 0-1 quadratic programming: Basic approaches and extensions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 1494-1503, June.
    2. David Bergman, 2019. "An Exact Algorithm for the Quadratic Multiknapsack Problem with an Application to Event Seating," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 477-492, July.
    3. Guillaume Sagnol & Edouard Pauwels, 2019. "An unexpected connection between Bayes A-optimal designs and the group lasso," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 565-584, April.
    4. Abdelfettah Laouzai & Rachid Ouafi, 2022. "A prediction model for atmospheric pollution reduction from urban traffic," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(2), pages 566-584, February.
    5. Chou, Chang-Chi & Chiang, Wen-Chu & Chen, Albert Y., 2022. "Emergency medical response in mass casualty incidents considering the traffic congestions in proximity on-site and hospital delays," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    6. Francesco Rinaldi & Damiano Zeffiro, 2023. "Avoiding bad steps in Frank-Wolfe variants," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 84(1), pages 225-264, January.
    7. Beck, Yasmine & Ljubić, Ivana & Schmidt, Martin, 2023. "A survey on bilevel optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 401-426.
    8. Quddus, Md Abdul & Shahvari, Omid & Marufuzzaman, Mohammad & Ekşioğlu, Sandra D. & Castillo-Villar, Krystel K., 2021. "Designing a reliable electric vehicle charging station expansion under uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    9. Friesz, Terry L. & Tourreilles, Francisco A. & Han, Anthony Fu-Wha, 1979. "Multi-Criteria Optimization Methods in Transport Project Evaluation: The Case of Rural Roads in Developing Countries," Transportation Research Forum Proceedings 1970s 318817, Transportation Research Forum.
    10. Fabiana R. Oliveira & Orizon P. Ferreira & Gilson N. Silva, 2019. "Newton’s method with feasible inexact projections for solving constrained generalized equations," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 159-177, January.
    11. Ali Fattahi & Sriram Dasu & Reza Ahmadi, 2019. "Mass Customization and “Forecasting Options’ Penetration Rates Problem”," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(4), pages 1120-1134, July.
    12. Robenek, Tomáš & Umang, Nitish & Bierlaire, Michel & Ropke, Stefan, 2014. "A branch-and-price algorithm to solve the integrated berth allocation and yard assignment problem in bulk ports," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 399-411.
    13. Schauer, Joachim, 2016. "Asymptotic behavior of the quadratic knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(2), pages 357-363.
    14. Bo Jiang & Tianyi Lin & Shiqian Ma & Shuzhong Zhang, 2019. "Structured nonconvex and nonsmooth optimization: algorithms and iteration complexity analysis," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 115-157, January.
    15. James Chok & Geoffrey M. Vasil, 2023. "Convex optimization over a probability simplex," Papers 2305.09046, arXiv.org.
    16. A. de Palma & Y. Nesterov, 2001. "Stationary Dynamic Solutions in Congested Transportation Networks: Summary and Perspectives," THEMA Working Papers 2001-19, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    17. Vittorio Maniezzo, 1999. "Exact and Approximate Nondeterministic Tree-Search Procedures for the Quadratic Assignment Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 358-369, November.
    18. D. J. White, 1993. "A parametric‐based heuristic program for the quadratic assignment problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(4), pages 553-568, June.
    19. Pessoa, Artur Alves & Hahn, Peter M. & Guignard, Monique & Zhu, Yi-Rong, 2010. "Algorithms for the generalized quadratic assignment problem combining Lagrangean decomposition and the Reformulation-Linearization Technique," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 54-63, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joheur:v:27:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10732-019-09433-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.