IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joecth/v40y2009i2p333-338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The asymptotic shapley value for a simple market game

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Liggett
  • Steven Lippman
  • Richard Rumelt

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Liggett & Steven Lippman & Richard Rumelt, 2009. "The asymptotic shapley value for a simple market game," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 40(2), pages 333-338, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joecth:v:40:y:2009:i:2:p:333-338
    DOI: 10.1007/s00199-008-0374-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00199-008-0374-4
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00199-008-0374-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aumann, Robert J, 1975. "Values of Markets with a Continuum of Traders," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 43(4), pages 611-646, July.
    2. Hart, Sergiu & Mas-Colell, Andreu, 1996. "Bargaining and Value," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 357-380, March.
    3. Shapley, Lloyd S & Shubik, Martin, 1969. "Pure Competition, Coalitional Power, and Fair Division," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 10(3), pages 337-362, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. van den Brink, René & Pintér, Miklós, 2015. "On axiomatizations of the Shapley value for assignment games," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 110-114.
    2. Ulrich Faigle & Michel Grabisch, 2012. "Values for Markovian coalition processes," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 51(3), pages 505-538, November.
    3. René Brink & P. Herings & Gerard Laan & A. Talman, 2015. "The Average Tree permission value for games with a permission tree," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 58(1), pages 99-123, January.
    4. Yang, Zhihua & Zhang, Qianwei, 2015. "Resource allocation based on DEA and modified Shapley value," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 263(C), pages 280-286.
    5. Zhongwen Xu & Zixuan Peng & Ling Yang & Xudong Chen, 2018. "An Improved Shapley Value Method for a Green Supply Chain Income Distribution Mechanism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, September.
    6. René Brink & Chris Dietz & Gerard Laan & Genjiu Xu, 2017. "Comparable characterizations of four solutions for permission tree games," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 63(4), pages 903-923, April.
    7. repec:hal:pseose:halshs-00749950 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Luo, Chenghong & Pérez-Castrillo, David & Sun, Chaoran, 2024. "The equilibrium-value convergence for the multiple-partners game," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    9. Shenbo Yang & Zhongfu Tan & Liwei Ju & Hongyu Lin & Gejirifu De & Qingkun Tan & Feng’ao Zhou, 2018. "An Income Distributing Optimization Model for Cooperative Operation among Different Types of Power Sellers Considering Different Scenarios," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emilio Calvo, 2008. "Random marginal and random removal values," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 37(4), pages 533-563, December.
    2. Roberto Serrano, 2007. "Cooperative Games: Core and Shapley Value," Working Papers wp2007_0709, CEMFI.
    3. Luo, Chenghong & Pérez-Castrillo, David & Sun, Chaoran, 2024. "The equilibrium-value convergence for the multiple-partners game," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    4. Thomas M. Liggett & Steven A. Lippman & Richard P. Rumelt, 2006. "The Asympotic Shapley Value for a Simple Market Game," Levine's Working Paper Archive 122247000000001011, David K. Levine.
    5. Einy, Ezra & Shitovitz, Benyamin, 1999. "Fine value allocations in large exchange economies with differential information," UC3M Working papers. Economics 6128, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
    6. Einy, Ezra & Shitovitz, Benyamin, 2001. "Private Value Allocations in Large Economies with Differential Information," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 287-311, February.
    7. McQuillin, Ben & Sugden, Robert, 2018. "Balanced externalities and the Shapley value," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 81-92.
    8. Martin Shubik, 1984. "The Cooperative Form, the Value and the Allocation of Joint Costs and Benefits," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 706, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    9. E. Calvo & E. Gutiérrez, 1996. "A prekernel characterization by means of stability properties," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 4(2), pages 257-267, December.
    10. Olivier Compte & Philippe Jehiel, 2010. "The Coalitional Nash Bargaining Solution," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 78(5), pages 1593-1623, September.
    11. Laruelle, Annick & Valenciano, Federico, 2008. "Noncooperative foundations of bargaining power in committees and the Shapley-Shubik index," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 341-353, May.
    12. Gonzalez, Stéphane & Rostom, Fatma Zahra, 2022. "Sharing the global outcomes of finite natural resource exploitation: A dynamic coalitional stability perspective," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 1-10.
    13. Arnold Polanski & Emiliya Lazarova, 2015. "Dynamic multilateral markets," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 44(4), pages 815-833, November.
    14. Zaporozhets, Vera & García-Valiñas, María & Kurz, Sascha, 2016. "Key drivers of EU budget allocation: Does power matter?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 57-70.
    15. Zhigang Cao, 2011. "Remarks on Bargaining and Cooperation in Strategic Form Games," Discussion Paper Series dp565, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    16. Richter, Marcel K. & Wong, K.-C.Kam-Chau, 2004. "Concave utility on finite sets," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 341-357, April.
    17. Casajus, André, 2014. "Potential, value, and random partitions," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 164-166.
    18. Manel Baucells & Rakesh K. Sarin, 2003. "Group Decisions with Multiple Criteria," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(8), pages 1105-1118, August.
    19. Gustavo Bergantiños & Balbina Casas- Méndez & Gloria Fiestras- Janeiro & Juan Vidal-Puga, 2005. "A Focal-Point Solution for Bargaining Problems with Coalition Structure," Game Theory and Information 0511006, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Maike Hoffmann & Peter Sudhölter, 2007. "The Shapley value of exact assignment games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 35(4), pages 557-568, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Shapley value; Core; Many players; C71; D41;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C71 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Cooperative Games
    • D41 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Perfect Competition

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joecth:v:40:y:2009:i:2:p:333-338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.