IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joamsc/v51y2023i3d10.1007_s11747-022-00895-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How has the effect of brand personality on customer-based brand equity changed over time? Longitudinal evidence from a panel data set spanning 18 years

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Luffarelli

    (Montpellier Business School)

  • Sebastiano A. Delre

    (Montpellier Business School)

  • Polina Landgraf

    (University of Virginia, McIntire School of Commerce)

Abstract

Using a panel data set (n = 49,626), this research tests opposing hypotheses about the influence of brand personality dimensions (BPDs) on customer-based brand equity (CBBE) and the evolution of this influence over an 18-year period. The results show that, on average, the BPDs of excitement, competence, and sincerity have more positive effects on CBBE than sophistication and ruggedness. Furthermore, the effects of sincerity, sophistication, and ruggedness on CBBE have declined over time while the effects of excitement and competence have grown more positive: A 1% change in excitement is associated with a .45% change in CBBE in 2001 and a .71% change in 2018 (a 58% increase), while a 1% change in competence is associated with a .42% change in CBBE in 2001 and a .60% change in 2018 (a 43% increase). How these effects vary between countries, industry sectors, and brand types is also explored.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Luffarelli & Sebastiano A. Delre & Polina Landgraf, 2023. "How has the effect of brand personality on customer-based brand equity changed over time? Longitudinal evidence from a panel data set spanning 18 years," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 598-616, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joamsc:v:51:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11747-022-00895-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11747-022-00895-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11747-022-00895-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11747-022-00895-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel K. Mroczek & Avron Spiro, 2003. "Modeling Intraindividual Change in Personality Traits: Findings From the Normative Aging Study," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 58(3), pages 153-165.
    2. S. Adam Brasel & Henrik Hagtvedt, 2016. "Living brands: consumer responses to animated brand logos," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 639-653, September.
    3. Stokburger-Sauer, Nicola & Ratneshwar, S. & Sen, Sankar, 2012. "Drivers of consumer–brand identification," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 406-418.
    4. Peter Magnusson & Stanford A. Westjohn & Nancy J. Sirianni, 2019. "Beyond country image favorability: How brand positioning via country personality stereotypes enhances brand evaluations," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(3), pages 318-338, April.
    5. J.J. Brakus & B.H. Schmitt & L. Zarantonello, 2009. "Brand Experience: What Is It? How Do We Measure It? And Does It Affect Loyalty?," Post-Print hal-00799102, HAL.
    6. Sabina Lissitsa & Ofrit Kol, 2021. "Four generational cohorts and hedonic m-shopping: association between personality traits and purchase intention," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 545-570, June.
    7. Aaker, Jennifer & Vohs, Kathleen D. & Mogilner, Cassie, 2010. "Non-profits Are Seen as Warm and For-Profits as Competent: Firm Stereotypes Matter," Research Papers 2047, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    8. Jonathan Z. Zhang & Chun-Wei Chang, 2021. "Correction to: Consumer dynamics: theories, methods, and emerging directions," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 197-197, January.
    9. Japutra, Arnold & Ekinci, Yuksel & Simkin, Lyndon, 2019. "Self-congruence, brand attachment and compulsive buying," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 456-463.
    10. Viktoria Maria Radler, 2018. "20 Years of brand personality: a bibliometric review and research agenda," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(4), pages 370-383, July.
    11. Jennifer Aaker & Kathleen D. Vohs & Cassie Mogilner, 2010. "Nonprofits Are Seen as Warm and For-Profits as Competent: Firm Stereotypes Matter," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(2), pages 224-237, August.
    12. Martin Eisend & Nicola Stokburger-Sauer, 2013. "Brand personality: A meta-analytic review of antecedents and consequences," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 205-216, September.
    13. Jonathan Z. Zhang & Chun-Wei Chang, 2021. "Consumer dynamics: theories, methods, and emerging directions," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 166-196, January.
    14. Jarvis, Cheryl Burke & MacKenzie, Scott B & Podsakoff, Philip M, 2003. "A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(2), pages 199-218, September.
    15. Hosany, Sameer & Martin, Drew, 2012. "Self-image congruence in consumer behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 685-691.
    16. Kevin Lane Keller & Donald R. Lehmann, 2006. "Brands and Branding: Research Findings and Future Priorities," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 740-759, 11-12.
    17. Steven Shepherd & Tanya L. Chartrand & Gavan J. Fitzsimons, 2015. "When Brands Reflect Our Ideal World: The Values and Brand Preferences of Consumers Who Support versus Reject Society’s Dominant Ideology," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 42(1), pages 76-92.
    18. Aaker, Jennifer & Benet-Martinez, Veronica & Garolera, Jordi, 2001. "Consumption Symbols as Carriers of Culture: A Study of Japanese and Spanish Brand Personality Constructs," Research Papers 1668r, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Landgraf, Polina & Stamatogiannakis, Antonios & Yang, Haiyang, 2024. "How mortality salience hurts brands with different personalities," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 308-324.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Viktoria Maria Radler, 2018. "20 Years of brand personality: a bibliometric review and research agenda," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(4), pages 370-383, July.
    2. Matzler, Kurt & Strobl, Andreas & Stokburger-Sauer, Nicola & Bobovnicky, Artur & Bauer, Florian, 2016. "Brand personality and culture: The role of cultural differences on the impact of brand personality perceptions on tourists' visit intentions," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 507-520.
    3. Japutra, Arnold & Molinillo, Sebastian, 2019. "Responsible and active brand personality: On the relationships with brand experience and key relationship constructs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 464-471.
    4. Frauke Sander & Ulrich Föhl & Nadine Walter & Vera Demmer, 2021. "Green or social? An analysis of environmental and social sustainability advertising and its impact on brand personality, credibility and attitude," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(4), pages 429-445, July.
    5. Delgado-Ballester, Elena & Fernandez-Sabiote, Estela, 2024. "Brand Stereotypes: On the relationships with gendered brand personality and agentic and communal values in fostering Consumer–Brand identification," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    6. Halkias, Georgios & Diamantopoulos, Adamantios, 2020. "Universal dimensions of individuals' perception: Revisiting the operationalization of warmth and competence with a mixed-method approach," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 714-736.
    7. Chen Yang & Jing Hu, 2022. "When do consumers prefer AI-enabled customer service? The interaction effect of brand personality and service provision type on brand attitudes and purchase intentions," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(2), pages 167-189, March.
    8. Jörg Lindenmeier & Christian Arnold & Adnan Zogaj & Dieter K. Tscheulin, 2021. "Congruence constructs as mediators of stereotypic image perceptions’ effect on student volunteering intention," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 18(4), pages 575-597, December.
    9. Japutra, Arnold & Molinillo, Sebastian & Wang, Shasha, 2018. "Aesthetic or self-expressiveness? Linking brand logo benefits, brand stereotypes and relationship quality," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 191-200.
    10. Liu, Fu & Wei, Haiying & Zhu, Zhenzhong & Chen, Haipeng (Allan), 2022. "Warmth or competence: Brand anthropomorphism, social exclusion, and advertisement effectiveness," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    11. Kolbl, Živa & Diamantopoulos, Adamantios & Arslanagic-Kalajdzic, Maja & Zabkar, Vesna, 2020. "Do brand warmth and brand competence add value to consumers? A stereotyping perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 346-362.
    12. Bernritter, Stefan F. & Verlegh, Peeter W.J. & Smit, Edith G., 2016. "Why Nonprofits Are Easier to Endorse on Social Media: The Roles of Warmth and Brand Symbolism," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 27-42.
    13. Cruz Tarrillo, Jose Joel & Haro Zea, Karla Liliana & Soria Quijaite, Juan Jesús, 2022. "Revisión sistemática: situación actual de la personalidad de marca para el posicionamiento estratégico," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 23(1), pages 315-340, January.
    14. Hamzah, Zalfa Laili & Syed Alwi, Sharifah Faridah & Othman, Md Nor, 2014. "Designing corporate brand experience in an online context: A qualitative insight," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2299-2310.
    15. Nierobisch, Tim & Toporowski, Waldemar & Dannewald, Till & Jahn, Steffen, 2017. "Flagship stores for FMCG national brands: Do they improve brand cognitions and create favorable consumer reactions?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 117-137.
    16. Lara-Rodríguez, Juan Sebastián & Rojas-Contreras, Camilo & Duque Oliva, Edison Jair, 2019. "Discovering emerging research topics for brand personality: A bibliometric analysis," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 261-272.
    17. Kull, Alexander J. & Romero, Marisabel & Monahan, Lisa, 2021. "How may I help you? Driving brand engagement through the warmth of an initial chatbot message," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 840-850.
    18. Beena Salim Saji & Mohit Vij & Sajal Kabiraj, 2015. "Selection of Tourism Destination as a Representation of Human Values," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 3(2), pages 95-108, July.
    19. Teng, Lefa & Xie, Chenxin & Liu, Tianjiao & Wang, Fan & Foti, Lianne, 2021. "The effects of uppercase vs. lowercase letters on consumers’ perceptions and brand attitudes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 164-175.
    20. Murphy Patrick J. & Pollack Jeff & Nagy Brian & Rutherford Matthew & Coombes Susan, 2019. "Risk Tolerance, Legitimacy, and Perspective: Navigating Biases in Social Enterprise Evaluations," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joamsc:v:51:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11747-022-00895-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.