IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jknowl/v8y2017i3d10.1007_s13132-015-0295-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explaining States’ Responses to the REAL ID Act: the Role of Resources, Political Environment, and Implementor Attitudes in Complying with a Federal Mandate

Author

Listed:
  • Faith Bradley

    (University of Arkansas)

  • William D. Schreckhise

    (University of Arkansas)

  • Daniel E. Chand

    (New Mexico State University)

Abstract

Fifteen state legislatures in the USA have enacted statutes prohibiting their states from complying with the federal REAL ID Act. This article seeks to explain why those states have explicitly opposed the act’s requirements. We determine to what extent state-level noncompliance is a product of the resources available to the state for compliance, the state’s political environment, the attitudes of key implementors in the state government, and the states’ level of concern with matters related to immigration. We find that the attitude of each state’s key implementor is the best predictor of whether a state has opted to oppose the act’s implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Faith Bradley & William D. Schreckhise & Daniel E. Chand, 2017. "Explaining States’ Responses to the REAL ID Act: the Role of Resources, Political Environment, and Implementor Attitudes in Complying with a Federal Mandate," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(3), pages 877-897, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:8:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s13132-015-0295-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s13132-015-0295-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13132-015-0295-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13132-015-0295-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bryan Shelly, 2008. "Rebels and Their Causes: State Resistance to No Child Left Behind," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 38(3), pages 444-468, Summer.
    2. Lael R. Keiser & Peter R. Mueser & Seung‐Whan Choi, 2004. "Race, Bureaucratic Discretion, and the Implementation of Welfare Reform," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(2), pages 314-327, April.
    3. Scholz, John T. & Twombly, Jim & Headrick, Barbara, 1991. "Street-Level Political Controls Over Federal Bureaucracy," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 85(3), pages 829-850, September.
    4. Sandra Vergari, 2010. "Safeguarding Federalism in Education Policy in Canada and the United States," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 40(3), pages 534-557, Summer.
    5. Matthew C. Fellowes & Gretchen Rowe, 2004. "Politics and the New American Welfare States," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(2), pages 362-373, April.
    6. Daniel J. Palazzolo & Fiona R. McCarthy, 2005. "State and Local Government Organizations and the Formation of the Help America Vote Act," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 35(4), pages 515-535, Fall.
    7. Priscilla M. Regan & Christopher J. Deering, 2009. "State Opposition to REAL ID," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 39(3), pages 476-505, Summer.
    8. Paul Posner, 2007. "The Politics of Coercive Federalism in the Bush Era," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 37(3), pages 390-412, Summer.
    9. Peter J. May, 1993. "Mandate design and implementation: Enhancing implementation efforts and shaping regulatory styles," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(4), pages 634-663.
    10. Tim Conlan & John Dinan, 2007. "Federalism, the Bush Administration, and the Transformation of American Conservatism," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 37(3), pages 279-303, Summer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William D. Schreckhise & Daniel E. Chand, 2023. "Local implementation of U.S. federal immigration programs: context, control, and the problems of intergovernmental implementation," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(4), pages 797-823, December.
    2. Adam M. Butz, 2016. "Theorizing About Poverty and Paternalism in Suburban America: The Case of Welfare Sanctions," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(2), pages 129-140, June.
    3. Priscilla M. Regan & Torin Monahan, 2014. "Fusion Center Accountability and Intergovernmental Information Sharing," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 44(3), pages 475-498.
    4. Jamila Michener, 2016. "Race, Poverty, and the Redistribution of Voting Rights," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(2), pages 106-128, June.
    5. Manuel Fernández-García & Clemente J. Navarro & Irene Gómez-Ramirez, 2021. "Evaluating Territorial Targets of European Integrated Urban Policy. The URBAN and URBANA Initiatives in Spain (1994–2013)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Thomas Döring & Jan Schnellenbach, 2011. "A tale of two federalisms: Germany, the United States and the ubiquity of centralization," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 83-102, March.
    7. Adam M. Butz, 2015. "Administrative Privatization and Employment Outcomes in the Implementation of Temporary Assistance to Needy Families," Evaluation Review, , vol. 39(4), pages 363-394, August.
    8. Hildebrand Sean, 2015. "Coerced Confusion? Local Emergency Policy Implementation After September 11," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 273-298, June.
    9. Ayoki, Milton, 2005. "Trade, informality and the policy process in Uganda," MPRA Paper 101790, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 18 Dec 2009.
    10. Assadi, Anahita & Lundin, Martin, 2015. "Tenure and street-level bureaucrats: how assessment tools are used at the frontline of the public sector," Working Paper Series 2015:19, IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.
    11. Aidan R. Vining, 2016. "What Is Public Agency Strategic Analysis (PASA) and How Does It Differ from Public Policy Analysis and Firm Strategy Analysis?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-31, December.
    12. Bernecker, Andreas, 2016. "Divided we reform? Evidence from US welfare policies," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 24-38.
    13. René Torenvlied, 1996. "Political Control Of Implementation Agencies," Rationality and Society, , vol. 8(1), pages 25-56, February.
    14. Jinwoo Kwon & Andrea Hetling, 2017. "Moving In and Out of Welfare and Work: The Influence of Regional Socioeconomic Circumstances on Economic Disconnection Among Low-Income Single Mothers," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 31(4), pages 326-341, November.
    15. Michael S. Hayes, 2015. "The Differential Effect of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) on States’ Contributions to Education Funding in States with Binding School District Tax and Expenditure Limitations," Public Budgeting & Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 49-72, March.
    16. David P. Carter, 2017. "Role perceptions and attitudes toward discretion at a decentralized regulatory frontline: The case of organic inspectors," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(4), pages 353-367, December.
    17. Rueß, Stefanie & Schneider, Gerald & Vogler, Jan, 2024. "Priming and prejudice: Experimental evidence on negative news frames and discrimination in German welfare offices," Working Papers 34, University of Konstanz, Cluster of Excellence "The Politics of Inequality. Perceptions, Participation and Policies".
    18. Baudot, Lisa & Cooper, David J., 2022. "Regulatory mandates and responses to uncomfortable knowledge: The case of country-by-country reporting in the extractive sector," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    19. Peter J. May & Raymond J. Burby, 1996. "Coercive versus cooperative policies: Comparing intergovernmental mandate performance," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(2), pages 171-201.
    20. Michael McGuire, 2000. "Collaborative Policy Making and Administration: The Operational Demands of Local Economic Development," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 14(3), pages 278-293, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:8:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s13132-015-0295-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.