IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jknowl/v15y2024i3d10.1007_s13132-023-01585-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovative Knowledge Generation: Exploring Trends in the Use of Early Childhood Education Apps in Chinese Families

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaodan Jin

    (Jimei University)

  • Eunhye Kim

    (Keimyung University)

  • Kyung-chul Kim

    (Korea National University of Education)

  • Sitian Chen

    (Fuzhou Jinan District Teacher Training School Affiliated Kindergarten)

Abstract

The advent of mobile app development, driven by the ubiquity of smartphones and tablets, has revolutionized early childhood education. This transformation is exemplified by the proliferation of early childhood education apps. Academic interest in education apps, particularly early childhood, underscores their importance in shaping learning experiences. This study delves into Chinese families' utilization patterns, examining awareness, attitudes, and guidance on app usage and children's engagement frequency. Results indicate early exposure and high-frequency use, underlining the apps' prevalence. The study also identifies the strengths and challenges of these apps. While they offer flexibility, interactive learning, and extensive content, there are concerns regarding potential addiction and lack of critical thinking. Collaboration among stakeholders, including schools, parents, and developers, ensures responsible usage. The research provides actionable recommendations. Parents should adopt a balanced view of early childhood education apps, recognizing their potential benefits while mitigating risks. Fostering a positive parent–child relationship is crucial, emphasizing communication and mutual understanding. Parents should enhance their ability to select and operate apps effectively. Creating an appropriate environment and providing scientific parenting instructions are also essential. Kindergartens are pivotal in cultivating children's good operating habits and formulating relevant regulations to ensure app quality. Theoretical implications highlight the need for a holistic approach, considering the interplay between children, parents, and technology. Policymakers, developers, and educators must acknowledge parents' pivotal role in digital education. Policies should promote responsible screen time and high-quality content. This study offers valuable insights into the evolving landscape of early childhood education, shaping the future of digital learning experiences for young children.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaodan Jin & Eunhye Kim & Kyung-chul Kim & Sitian Chen, 2024. "Innovative Knowledge Generation: Exploring Trends in the Use of Early Childhood Education Apps in Chinese Families," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 12253-12292, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s13132-023-01585-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s13132-023-01585-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13132-023-01585-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13132-023-01585-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dong, Chuanmei & Cao, Simin & Li, Hui, 2020. "Young children’s online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: Chinese parents’ beliefs and attitudes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    2. Carina S. González-González & María D. Guzmán-Franco & Alfonso Infante-Moro, 2019. "Tangible Technologies for Childhood Education: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Marcela Korenkova & Milan Maros & Michal Levicky & Milan Fila, 2020. "Consumer Perception of Modern and Traditional Forms of Advertising," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-25, November.
    4. Naughton, Barry J., 2018. "The Chinese Economy: Adaptation and Growth, second edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262534797, December.
    5. Gregory Trencher & Masafumi Nagao & Chiahsin Chen & Kentaro Ichiki & Tobai Sadayoshi & Mariko Kinai & Mio Kamitani & Shojiro Nakamura & Aiko Yamauchi & Masaru Yarime, 2017. "Implementing Sustainability Co-Creation between Universities and Society: A Typology-Based Understanding," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-28, April.
    6. Shaheer, Noman Ahmed & Li, Sali, 2020. "The CAGE around cyberspace? How digital innovations internationalize in a virtual world," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(1).
    7. Fletcher, Winston, 2008. "Powers of Persuasion: The Inside Story of British Advertising 1951-2000," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199228010.
    8. Daniel Belanche & Marta Flavián & Alfredo Pérez-Rueda, 2020. "Mobile Apps Use and WOM in the Food Delivery Sector: The Role of Planned Behavior, Perceived Security and Customer Lifestyle Compatibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    9. Hildie Leung & Daniel T. L. Shek & Edvina Leung & Esther Y. W. Shek, 2019. "Development of Contextually-relevant Sexuality Education: Lessons from a Comprehensive Review of Adolescent Sexuality Education Across Cultures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-24, February.
    10. Uncles, Mark D., 2018. "Directions in higher education: A marketing perspective," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 187-193.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scott Rozelle & Yiran Xia & Dimitris Friesen & Bronson Vanderjack & Nourya Cohen, 2020. "Moving Beyond Lewis: Employment and Wage Trends in China’s High- and Low-Skilled Industries and the Emergence of an Era of Polarization," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 62(4), pages 555-589, December.
    2. Thomas F. Remington & Andrei A. Yakovlev & Elena Ovchinnikova & Alexander Chasovsky, 2020. "Career Trajectories Of Regional Officials: Russia And China Before And After 2012," HSE Working papers WP BRP 754/PS/2020, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    3. Dongshui Xie & Caiquan Bai & Huimin Wang & Qihang Xue, 2022. "The Land System and the Rise and Fall of China’s Rural Industrialization: Based on the Perspective of Institutional Change of Rural Collective Construction Land," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Ma, Shuang & Mu, Ren, 2020. "Forced off the farm? Farmers’ labor allocation response to land requisition in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    5. Lintunen, Julia, 2021. "An overview of China's regional trade agreements," BOFIT Policy Briefs 1/2021, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    6. Olena Ivanova & Masna Rai & Kristien Michielsen & Sónia Dias, 2020. "How Sexuality Education Programs Have Been Evaluated in Low- and Lower-Middle-Income Countries? A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Linda Daniela & Zanda Rubene & Arta Rūdolfa, 2021. "Parents’ Perspectives on Remote Learning in the Pandemic Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-12, March.
    8. Bingdao Zheng & Yanfeng Gu, 2022. "Institutional dynamics and access to non‐farm employment in rural China, 1950–1996," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 265-289, November.
    9. Jesús Fernández-Villaverde & Lee E. Ohanian & Wen Yao, 2023. "The Neoclassical Growth of China," NBER Working Papers 31351, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Klaus E. Meyer & Jiatao Li & Keith D. Brouthers & Ruey-Jer ‘‘Bryan’’ Jean, 2023. "International business in the digital age: Global strategies in a world of national institutions," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(4), pages 577-598, June.
    11. Shaheer, Noman & Kim, Kijong & Li, Sali, 2022. "Internationalization of Digital Innovations: A Rapidly Evolving Research Stream," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(4).
    12. Bankole Osita Awuzie & Amal Abuzeinab, 2019. "Modelling Organisational Factors Influencing Sustainable Development Implementation Performance in Higher Education Institutions: An Interpretative Structural Modelling (ISM) Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-18, August.
    13. Tommy Tanu Wijaya & Boran Yu & Fei Xu & Zhiqiang Yuan & Mailizar Mailizar, 2023. "Analysis of Factors Affecting Academic Performance of Mathematics Education Doctoral Students: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-23, March.
    14. Manuel Muñoz-Suárez & Natividad Guadalajara & José M. Osca, 2020. "A Comparative Analysis between Global University Rankings and Environmental Sustainability of Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    15. Dae-Ho Byun & Han-Na Yang & Dong-Seop Chung, 2020. "Evaluation of Mobile Applications Usability of Logistics in Life Startups," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-17, October.
    16. Shaheer, Noman & Chen, Yu & Kim, Hoik & Li, Sali, 2024. "Disguise or disclose? How identities of individual entrepreneurs on digital platforms influence their international success," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2).
    17. Ștefan Andrei Neștian & Ana Iolanda Vodă & Silviu Mihail Tiță & Alexandra Luciana Guță & Elena-Sabina Turnea, 2021. "Does Individual Knowledge Management in Online Education Prepare Business Students for Employability in Online Businesses?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    18. Jiwei Qian & Tuan‐Hwee Sng, 2021. "The state in Chinese economic history," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(3), pages 359-395, November.
    19. Yang Zhou, 2024. "Trapped in the platform: Migration and precarity in China's platform-based gig economy," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(4), pages 1195-1210, June.
    20. Shaheer, Noman & Chen, Liang & Yi, Jingtao & Li, Sali & Su, Huiwen, 2024. "Network effects, word of mouth, and entry performance: A study of digital freemium products," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 59(6).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s13132-023-01585-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.