IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jknowl/v11y2020i4d10.1007_s13132-019-00602-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Russian Arctic Offshore Oil and Gas Projects: Methodological Framework for Evaluating Their Prospects

Author

Listed:
  • E. Carayannis

    (George Washington University)

  • A. Ilinova

    (Saint-Petersburg Mining University)

  • A. Chanysheva

    (Saint-Petersburg Mining University)

Abstract

Russia is one of the key players in the Arctic due to its significant hydrocarbon resources, and the relevance of developing its Arctic offshore deposits is obvious. However, the presence of considerable reserves of oil and gas on the Russian Arctic shelf does not guarantee the success of projects aimed at developing these deposits, since a whole group of contradictory political, macroeconomic, and other factors impacts their initiation and realization. This influence has now intensified with the current problematic macroeconomic situation in Russia, particularly in the energy sector. Furthermore, the current international political scene has a direct impact on Russia’s activities in the field of offshore projects. Economic, geopolitical, climatic, infrastructure, ecological, and other factors create uncertainty in the development of the Arctic oil and gas projects. The development of Arctic territories and shelf deposits, as part of a complex economic system, is subject to numerous disputes. The purpose of this paper is to study the prospects for the implementation of projects for the oil and gas production from offshore Arctic fields. As a result of the research, the work presents a methodology for assessing the prospects of the Arctic oil and gas offshore project which is called TESCIMP methodology. It is based on the TESCIMP analysis, a two-dimensional classification of TESCIMP indicators and the algorithm for selecting TESCIMP factors used in the analysis of specific deposits and choosing one of the projects for its development as the most promising.

Suggested Citation

  • E. Carayannis & A. Ilinova & A. Chanysheva, 2020. "Russian Arctic Offshore Oil and Gas Projects: Methodological Framework for Evaluating Their Prospects," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(4), pages 1403-1429, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:11:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s13132-019-00602-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s13132-019-00602-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13132-019-00602-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13132-019-00602-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elias G. Carayannis & Alexey E. Cherepovitsyn & Alina A. Ilinova, 2017. "Sustainable Development of the Russian Arctic zone energy shelf: the Role of the Quintuple Innovation Helix Model," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(2), pages 456-470, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Valeriy Kryukov & Anatoliy Tokarev, 2022. "Spatial trends of innovation in the Russian oil and gas sector: What does patent activity in Siberia and the Arctic reflect?," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(1), pages 127-146, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elias Carayannis & Pantelis Kostis & Hasan Dinçer & Serhat Yüksel, 2024. "Quality Function Deployment-Oriented Strategic Outlook to Sustainable Energy Policies Based on Quintuple Innovation Helix," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 6761-6779, June.
    2. Andréa Aparecida Costa Mineiro & Cleber Carvalho Castro & Marcelo Gonçalves do Amaral, 2024. "Who Are the Actors of Quadruple and Quintuple Helix? Multiple Cases in Consolidated Science and Technology Parks," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 4691-4709, March.
    3. Xie, Zhong & Lu, Wenling & Yu, Jing & Wu, Yanrui & Liu, Qing, 2022. "Development zones and green innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed companies," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    4. Elias G. Carayannis & Gaye Acikdilli & Christopher Ziemnowicz, 2020. "Creative Destruction in International Trade: Insights from the Quadruple and Quintuple Innovation Helix Models," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(4), pages 1489-1508, December.
    5. Tatiana Ponomarenko & Marina Nevskaya & Izabela Jonek-Kowalska, 2021. "Mineral Resource Depletion Assessment: Alternatives, Problems, Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    6. M. Kruk & A. Semenov & A. Cherepovitsyn & A. Nikulina, 2018. "Environmental and Economic Damage from the Development of Oil and Gas Fields in the Arctic Shelf of the Russian Federation," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 423-433.
    7. Samuel Howard Quartey & Olamide Oguntoye, 2021. "Understanding and Promoting Industrial Sustainability in Africa Through the Triple Helix Approach: a Conceptual Model and Research Propositions," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(3), pages 1100-1118, September.
    8. S. A. Suspitsyn, 2021. "Set of Methods and Procedures for Analyzing and Forecasting the Development of the Eastern Regions of the Russian Federation," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 65-77, December.
    9. Samuel Howard Quartey, 2019. "Geographies of Knowledge and Sustainable Development: Towards a Conceptual Model with Research Propositions," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(2), pages 878-897, June.
    10. Alexey Cherepovitsyn & Dmitry Metkin & Alexander Gladilin, 2018. "An Algorithm of Management Decision-Making Regarding the Feasibility of Investing in Geological Studies of Forecasted Hydrocarbon Resources," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-17, August.
    11. Ilin, Igior & Kersten, Wolfgang & Jahn, Carlos & Weigell, Jürgen & Levina, Anastasia & Kalyazina, Sofia, 2020. "State of research in arctic maritime logistics," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Data Science in Maritime and City Logistics: Data-driven Solutions for Logistics and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conferen, volume 30, pages 383-407, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    12. Shuaiyu Yao & Mengmeng Chen & Dmitri Muravev & Wendi Ouyang, 2021. "Eco-Efficiency Analysis for the Russian Cities along the Northern Sea Route: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach Using an Epsilon-Based Measure Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-16, June.
    13. L. G. Karanatova & A. Yu. Kulev, 2022. "Socio-Economic Development of the Arctic: Modern Challenges and Priorities," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., issue 2.
    14. Galina Ivanovna POPODKO & Tatyana Sergeevna ZIMNYAKOVA & Svetlana Leonidovna ULINA & Ekaterina Vladimirovna SUMINA, 2019. "Modeling The Innovative Performance Of Resource Areas: Analysis Of 22 Russian Regions," Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 19(2), pages 57-68.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:11:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s13132-019-00602-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.