IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jhappi/v22y2021i2d10.1007_s10902-020-00244-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Indicates Your Life is Meaningful? A New Measure for the Indicators of Meaning in Life (3IML)

Author

Listed:
  • Avichai Shuv-Ami

    (The College of Management Academic Studies)

  • Liad Bareket-Bojmel

    (Peres Academic Center)

Abstract

A new scale for the measurement of indicators of meaning in life—3IML—was developed and suggested as part of this work. We adapted the perspective of Heintzelman and King (Am Psychol 69(6):561–574, 2014b), according to which indicators for the perception of meaning in life are (a) sense: the feeling that the world around us is coherent and makes sense; (b) spirit: positive affect and good mood; and (c) social relatedness: relationships and connection with others. All the indicators are based on previous empirical evidence. In four large-scale studies with 1087 participants overall, we tested and verified the 3IML as a reliable and structurally sound scale. In Study 1, we verified the factorial validity of the proposed scale using exploratory factor analysis. In Study 2, we conducted a confirmatory factor analysis using structural equation modeling. In Study 3, we tested the nomological network validity against an existing self-report scale of perceived meaning in life and some of its known consequences (increase in optimism, decrease in depression). In Study 4, we established incremental validity of the 3IML scale. Although defining or measuring meaning in life is not easy, the suggested approach to measuring indicators of meaning does not rely on participants' definitions of meaning in life. This approach offers a short, multidimensional measure that conceptualizes meaning in life as lying at the confluence of sense, spirit, and social relatedness.

Suggested Citation

  • Avichai Shuv-Ami & Liad Bareket-Bojmel, 2021. "What Indicates Your Life is Meaningful? A New Measure for the Indicators of Meaning in Life (3IML)," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 625-644, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jhappi:v:22:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s10902-020-00244-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10902-020-00244-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10902-020-00244-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10902-020-00244-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sonja Lyubomirsky & Heidi Lepper, 1999. "A Measure of Subjective Happiness: Preliminary Reliability and Construct Validation," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 137-155, February.
    2. Cadogan, John W. & Lee, Nick, 2013. "Improper use of endogenous formative variables," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 233-241.
    3. Jarvis, Cheryl Burke & MacKenzie, Scott B & Podsakoff, Philip M, 2003. "A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(2), pages 199-218, September.
    4. Grant, Adam M. & Campbell, Elizabeth M. & Chen, Grace & Cottone, Keenan & Lapedis, David & Lee, Karen, 2007. "Impact and the art of motivation maintenance: The effects of contact with beneficiaries on persistence behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 53-67, May.
    5. Michael Steger & Todd Kashdan, 2007. "Stability and specificity of meaning in life and life satisfaction over one year," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 161-179, June.
    6. Antonovsky, Aaron, 1993. "The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 725-733, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Edward C. Chang, 2024. "Beyond Dispositional Optimism and Pessimism: Does the Tripartite Model of Meaning in Life Matter in Predicting Future Well-Being in Adults?," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 1-18, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leiv Gabrielsen & Pål Ulleberg & Reidulf Watten, 2012. "The Adolescent Life Goal Profile Scale: Development of a New Scale for Measurements of Life Goals Among Young People," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 13(6), pages 1053-1072, December.
    2. Antonio Crego & José Ramón Yela & Rita Ozores-Pérez & Pablo Riesco-Matías & María Ángeles Gómez-Martínez, 2022. "Eudaimonic and Uncertainty Metaphors About Life are Associated with Meaningfulness, Experiential Avoidance, Mental Health and Happiness," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 4119-4146, December.
    3. Adamantios Diamantopoulos & Dirk Temme, 2013. "MIMIC models, formative indicators and the joys of research," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 3(3), pages 160-170, September.
    4. Antonio Crego & José Ramón Yela & María Ángeles Gómez-Martínez & Pablo Riesco-Matías & Cristina Petisco-Rodríguez, 2021. "Relationships between Mindfulness, Purpose in Life, Happiness, Anxiety, and Depression: Testing a Mediation Model in a Sample of Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Bruno Damásio & Silvia Koller, 2015. "Complex Experiences of Meaning in Life: Individual Differences Among Sociodemographic Variables, Sources of Meaning and Psychological Functioning," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 123(1), pages 161-181, August.
    6. Nick Lee & John W. Cadogan & Laura Chamberlain, 2013. "The MIMIC model and formative variables: problems and solutions," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 3(1), pages 3-17, March.
    7. Dirk Temme & Adamantios Diamantopoulos & Vanessa Pfegfeidel, 2014. "Specifying Formatively-measured Constructs In Endogenous Positions In Structural Equation Models: Caveats and Guidelines For Researchers," Schumpeter Discussion Papers SDP14005, Universitätsbibliothek Wuppertal, University Library.
    8. Collier, Joel E. & Barnes, Donald C. & Abney, Alexandra K. & Pelletier, Mark J., 2018. "Idiosyncratic service experiences: When customers desire the extraordinary in a service encounter," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 150-161.
    9. Pninit Russo-Netzer, 2019. "Prioritizing Meaning as a Pathway to Meaning in Life and Well-Being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(6), pages 1863-1891, August.
    10. Jian-Bin Li & Ying-Shuang Wang & Kai Dou & Ya-Fei Shang, 2022. "On the Development of Meaning in Life Among College Freshmen: Social Relationship Antecedents and Adjustment Consequences," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1709-1735, April.
    11. Karpen, Ingo O. & Bove, Liliana L. & Lukas, Bryan A. & Zyphur, Michael J., 2015. "Service-Dominant Orientation: Measurement and Impact on Performance Outcomes," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 89-108.
    12. Jun-Hwa Cheah & Hiram Ting & T. Ramayah & Mumtaz Ali Memon & Tat-Huei Cham & Enrico Ciavolino, 2019. "A comparison of five reflective–formative estimation approaches: reconsideration and recommendations for tourism research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 1421-1458, May.
    13. Sebastian Hohenberg & Christian Homburg, 2019. "Enhancing innovation commercialization through supervisor–sales rep fit," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 681-701, July.
    14. Suoniemi, Samppa & Terho, Harri & Zablah, Alex & Olkkonen, Rami & Straub, Detmar W., 2021. "The impact of firm-level and project-level it capabilities on CRM system quality and organizational productivity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 108-122.
    15. Matteo Mazziotta & Adriano Pareto, 2019. "Use and Misuse of PCA for Measuring Well-Being," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 142(2), pages 451-476, April.
    16. Aknin, Lara B. & Dunn, Elizabeth W. & Whillans, Ashley V. & Grant, Adam M. & Norton, Michael I., 2013. "Making a difference matters: Impact unlocks the emotional benefits of prosocial spending," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 90-95.
    17. Finn, Adam & Wang, Luming, 2014. "Formative vs. reflective measures: Facets of variation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 2821-2826.
    18. Christophe Leys & Ilios Kotsou & Rebecca Shankland & Mathilde Firmin & Sandrine Péneau & Pierre Fossion, 2021. "Resilience Predicts Lower Anxiety and Depression and Greater Recovery after a Vicarious Trauma," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-8, November.
    19. Chang, Woojung & Franke, George R. & Lee, Nick, 2016. "Comparing reflective and formative measures: New insights from relevant simulations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3177-3185.
    20. Temme, Dirk & Diamantopoulos, Adamantios & Pfegfeidel, Vanessa, 2014. "Specifying formatively-measured constructs in endogenous positions in structural equation models: Caveats and guidelines for researchers," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 309-316.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jhappi:v:22:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s10902-020-00244-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.