IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jglopt/v79y2021i1d10.1007_s10898-020-00926-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Karush–Kuhn–Tucker type optimality condition for quasiconvex programming in terms of Greenberg–Pierskalla subdifferential

Author

Listed:
  • Satoshi Suzuki

    (Shimane University)

Abstract

In the research of optimization problems, optimality conditions play an important role. By using some derivatives, various types of necessary and/or sufficient optimality conditions have been introduced by many researchers. Especially, in convex programming, necessary and sufficient optimality conditions in terms of the subdifferential have been studied extensively. Recently, necessary and sufficient optimality conditions for quasiconvex programming have been investigated by the authors. However, there are not so many results concerned with Karush–Kuhn–Tucker type optimality conditions for non-differentiable quasiconvex programming. In this paper, we study a Karush–Kuhn–Tucker type optimality condition for quasiconvex programming in terms of Greenberg–Pierskalla subdifferential. We show some closedness properties for Greenberg–Pierskalla subdifferential. Under the Slater constraint qualification, we show a necessary and sufficient optimality condition for essentially quasiconvex programming in terms of Greenberg–Pierskalla subdifferential. Additionally, we introduce a necessary and sufficient constraint qualification of the optimality condition. As a corollary, we show a necessary and sufficient optimality condition for convex programming in terms of the subdifferential.

Suggested Citation

  • Satoshi Suzuki, 2021. "Karush–Kuhn–Tucker type optimality condition for quasiconvex programming in terms of Greenberg–Pierskalla subdifferential," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 79(1), pages 191-202, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:79:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10898-020-00926-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10898-020-00926-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10898-020-00926-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10898-020-00926-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Satoshi Suzuki & Daishi Kuroiwa, 2015. "Characterizations of the solution set for quasiconvex programming in terms of Greenberg–Pierskalla subdifferential," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 431-441, July.
    2. Satoshi Suzuki & Daishi Kuroiwa, 2011. "On Set Containment Characterization and Constraint Qualification for Quasiconvex Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 554-563, June.
    3. Suliman Al-Homidan & Nicolas Hadjisavvas & Loai Shaalan, 2018. "Transformation of Quasiconvex Functions to Eliminate Local Minima," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 177(1), pages 93-105, April.
    4. Alberto Cambini & Laura Martein, 2009. "Generalized Convexity and Optimization," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Springer, number 978-3-540-70876-6, July.
    5. Satoshi Suzuki, 2019. "Optimality Conditions and Constraint Qualifications for Quasiconvex Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 183(3), pages 963-976, December.
    6. Jean-Paul Penot & Michel Volle, 1990. "On Quasi-Convex Duality," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 597-625, November.
    7. Satoshi Suzuki & Daishi Kuroiwa, 2017. "Duality Theorems for Separable Convex Programming Without Qualifications," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 172(2), pages 669-683, February.
    8. J.P. Penot, 2003. "Characterization of Solution Sets of Quasiconvex Programs," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 117(3), pages 627-636, June.
    9. Satoshi Suzuki & Daishi Kuroiwa, 2013. "Some constraint qualifications for quasiconvex vector-valued systems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 539-548, March.
    10. V. Jeyakumar, 2008. "Constraint Qualifications Characterizing Lagrangian Duality in Convex Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 31-41, January.
    11. Hu, Yaohua & Yang, Xiaoqi & Sim, Chee-Khian, 2015. "Inexact subgradient methods for quasi-convex optimization problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(2), pages 315-327.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. A. Kabgani & F. Lara, 2022. "Strong subdifferentials: theory and applications in nonconvex optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 84(2), pages 349-368, October.
    2. A. Kabgani & F. Lara, 2023. "Semistrictly and neatly quasiconvex programming using lower global subdifferentials," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 86(4), pages 845-865, August.
    3. Alireza Kabgani, 2021. "Characterization of Nonsmooth Quasiconvex Functions and their Greenberg–Pierskalla’s Subdifferentials Using Semi-Quasidifferentiability notion," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 189(2), pages 666-678, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Satoshi Suzuki, 2019. "Optimality Conditions and Constraint Qualifications for Quasiconvex Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 183(3), pages 963-976, December.
    2. Satoshi Suzuki & Daishi Kuroiwa, 2020. "Duality Theorems for Convex and Quasiconvex Set Functions," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 1-13, March.
    3. A. Kabgani & F. Lara, 2023. "Semistrictly and neatly quasiconvex programming using lower global subdifferentials," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 86(4), pages 845-865, August.
    4. Nader Kanzi & Majid Soleimani-damaneh, 2020. "Characterization of the weakly efficient solutions in nonsmooth quasiconvex multiobjective optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 77(3), pages 627-641, July.
    5. Satoshi Suzuki & Daishi Kuroiwa, 2017. "Duality Theorems for Separable Convex Programming Without Qualifications," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 172(2), pages 669-683, February.
    6. Satoshi Suzuki & Daishi Kuroiwa, 2013. "Some constraint qualifications for quasiconvex vector-valued systems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 539-548, March.
    7. Satoshi Suzuki & Daishi Kuroiwa, 2015. "Characterizations of the solution set for quasiconvex programming in terms of Greenberg–Pierskalla subdifferential," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 431-441, July.
    8. Jean-Paul Penot, 2015. "Projective dualities for quasiconvex problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 411-430, July.
    9. Satoshi Suzuki & Daishi Kuroiwa, 2012. "Necessary and Sufficient Constraint Qualification for Surrogate Duality," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 152(2), pages 366-377, February.
    10. Elisa Mastrogiacomo & Emanuela Rosazza Gianin, 2015. "Portfolio Optimization with Quasiconvex Risk Measures," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 1042-1059, October.
    11. Vsevolod I. Ivanov, 2020. "Characterization of Radially Lower Semicontinuous Pseudoconvex Functions," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 184(2), pages 368-383, February.
    12. Felipe Lara, 2020. "Optimality Conditions for Nonconvex Nonsmooth Optimization via Global Derivatives," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 185(1), pages 134-150, April.
    13. Sorin-Mihai Grad & Felipe Lara, 2022. "An extension of the proximal point algorithm beyond convexity," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 82(2), pages 313-329, February.
    14. Xiangkai Sun & Kok Lay Teo & Liping Tang, 2019. "Dual Approaches to Characterize Robust Optimal Solution Sets for a Class of Uncertain Optimization Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 182(3), pages 984-1000, September.
    15. J.P. Penot, 2003. "Lagrangian Approach to Quasiconvex Programing," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 117(3), pages 637-647, June.
    16. Vsevolod I. Ivanov, 2019. "Characterizations of Solution Sets of Differentiable Quasiconvex Programming Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 144-162, April.
    17. Shinji Yamada & Akiko Takeda, 2018. "Successive Lagrangian relaxation algorithm for nonconvex quadratic optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 313-339, June.
    18. Boualem Alleche & Vicenţiu D. Rădulescu, 2017. "Further on Set-Valued Equilibrium Problems and Applications to Browder Variational Inclusions," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 39-58, October.
    19. Alberto Del Pia & Robert Hildebrand & Robert Weismantel & Kevin Zemmer, 2016. "Minimizing Cubic and Homogeneous Polynomials over Integers in the Plane," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(2), pages 511-530, May.
    20. Wang, Wei & Xu, Huifu & Ma, Tiejun, 2023. "Optimal scenario-dependent multivariate shortfall risk measure and its application in risk capital allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 322-347.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:79:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10898-020-00926-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.