IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jenvss/v12y2022i3d10.1007_s13412-022-00759-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the quantity and toxicity of chemical releases from TRI facilities in Upstate New York

Author

Listed:
  • Amanda T. Charette

    (State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry
    State University of New York College of Environmental)

  • Dustin T. Hill

    (State University of New York College of Environmental
    State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry)

  • Mary B. Collins

    (State University of New York College of Environmental
    State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry)

  • Jaime E. Mirowsky

    (State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry
    State University of New York College of Environmental)

Abstract

Pollutant chemical releases and their toxicological profiles have been investigated by many researchers in the past; however, little work of this kind has been conducted in the Upstate New York area. The objectives of this study were to compare the pollutant releases from Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) facilities in Upstate New York, both by quantity and toxicity. Using hierarchal clustering, seven unique residential clusters were created from nine population demographics representing neighborhood-based socioeconomic status. TRI facilities were geocoded into the residential clusters, and the quantity and toxicity of chemicals released from these facilities were obtained. The facilities in the Minority Working Class and Working Class clusters released the greatest quantity of chemicals. However, when looking at the toxicity of the chemicals released, reporting only the quantity of polluting chemicals had the potential to underestimate the potential toxicological risk faced by the communities surrounding these facilities; this was true for both the overall quantity of chemicals released and when looking at carcinogens released, in particular. Lastly, it was seen that not including toxicity in reported results might hide many toxic chemicals that are released in low quantities. The use of chemical weighing systems in studies such as this is imperative to fully inform individuals of the toxic chemicals being released within their communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Amanda T. Charette & Dustin T. Hill & Mary B. Collins & Jaime E. Mirowsky, 2022. "Assessing the quantity and toxicity of chemical releases from TRI facilities in Upstate New York," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(3), pages 417-429, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:12:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s13412-022-00759-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s13412-022-00759-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13412-022-00759-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13412-022-00759-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Don Grant & Andrew Jorgenson & Wesley Longhofer, 2013. "Targeting electricity’s extreme polluters to reduce energy-related CO 2 emissions," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 3(4), pages 376-380, December.
    2. Wilson, S.M. & Fraser-Rahim, H. & Williams, E. & Zhang, H. & Rice, L. & Svendsen, E. & Abara, W., 2012. "Assessment of the distribution of toxic release inventory facilities in metropolitan Charleston: An environmental justice case study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 102(10), pages 1974-1980.
    3. Jayajit Chakraborty & Timothy W. Collins & Sara E. Grineski & Marilyn C. Montgomery & Maricarmen Hernandez, 2014. "Comparing Disproportionate Exposure to Acute and Chronic Pollution Risks: A Case Study in Houston, Texas," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(11), pages 2005-2020, November.
    4. Amanda T. Charette & Mary B. Collins & Jaime E. Mirowsky, 2021. "Assessing residential socioeconomic factors associated with pollutant releases using EPA’s Toxic Release Inventory," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 11(2), pages 247-257, June.
    5. Mark D. Shapiro & Steven M. Hassur & Nicholaas W. Bouwes, 2001. "Empowerment Through Risk-Related Information: EPA's Risk Screening Environmental Indicators Project," Working Papers wp18, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    6. Glinda S. Cooper & Cheryl Siegel Scott & Ambuja S. Bale, 2011. "Insights from Epidemiology into Dichloromethane and Cancer Risk," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-19, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amanda Pavan & Sue C. Grady & Igor Vojnovic, 2023. "Racial and ethnic disparities in exposure to risk-screening environmental indicator (RSEI) toxicity-weighted concentrations: Michigan Census Tracts, 2008–2017," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 13(2), pages 221-239, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeong-Il Park & Hye-Seon Kwon, 2019. "Examining the Association between Socioeconomic Status and Exposure to Carcinogenic Emissions in Gyeonggi of South Korea: A Multi-Level Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Sara E. Grineski & Timothy W. Collins & Jayajit Chakraborty & Marilyn Montgomery, 2017. "Hazard Characteristics and Patterns of Environmental Injustice: Household‐Level Determinants of Environmental Risk in Miami, Florida," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(7), pages 1419-1434, July.
    3. Ryan Johnson & Kim Ramsey-White & Christina H. Fuller, 2016. "Socio-demographic Differences in Toxic Release Inventory Siting and Emissions in Metro Atlanta," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-12, July.
    4. Konrad Samsel & Tanya Navaneelan & Nathan DeBono & Louis Everest & Paul A. Demers & Jeavana Sritharan, 2024. "Leukemia Incidence by Occupation and Industry: A Cohort Study of 2.3 Million Workers from Ontario, Canada," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(8), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Michael E. Conroy, 2001. "Can Advocacy-Led Certification Systems Transform Global Corporate Practices? Evidence, and Some Theory," Working Papers wp21, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    6. Zhaohua Zhang & Derrick Robinson & Diane Hite, 2018. "Racial Residential Segregation: Measuring Location Choice Attributes of Environmental Quality and Self-Segregation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, April.
    7. Michael Ash & T. Robert Fetter, 2004. "Who Lives on the Wrong Side of the Environmental Tracks? Evidence from the EPA's Risk‐Screening Environmental Indicators Model," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 85(2), pages 441-462, June.
    8. Monica D. Ramirez-Andreotta & Julia Green Brody & Nathan Lothrop & Miranda Loh & Paloma I. Beamer & Phil Brown, 2016. "Improving Environmental Health Literacy and Justice through Environmental Exposure Results Communication," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-27, July.
    9. James Boyce, 2003. "Inequality and Environmental Protection," Working Papers wp52, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    10. Lisa Jordan & Keith Griffin & Jane D'Arista, 2001. "Democratizing Global Economic Governance: A PERI Symposium," Working Papers wp26, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    11. Arthur Moses & Jean E. T. McLain & Aminata Kilungo & Robert A. Root & Leif Abrell & Sanlyn Buxner & Flor Sandoval & Theresa Foley & Miriam Jones & Mónica D. Ramírez-Andreotta, 2022. "Minding the gap: socio-demographic factors linked to the perception of environmental pollution, water harvesting infrastructure, and gardening characteristics," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(3), pages 594-610, September.
    12. Zwickl, Klara & Ash, Michael & Boyce, James K., 2014. "Regional variation in environmental inequality: Industrial air toxics exposure in U.S. cities," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 494-509.
    13. Jayajit Chakraborty & Timothy W. Collins & Sara E. Grineski & Alejandra Maldonado, 2017. "Racial Differences in Perceptions of Air Pollution Health Risk: Does Environmental Exposure Matter?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, January.
    14. Fischer, Carolyn & Parry, Ian W.H. & Aguilar, Francisco X. & Jawahar, Puja, 2005. "Corporate Codes of Conduct: Is Common Environmental Content Feasible?," Discussion Papers 10889, Resources for the Future.
    15. Grant, Don & Jorgenson, Andrew & Longhofer, Wesley, 2018. "Pathways to Carbon Pollution: The Interactive Effects of Global, Political, and Organizational Factors on Power Plants’ CO2 Emissions," SocArXiv r2fyt, Center for Open Science.
    16. Yoo Min Park & Mei-Po Kwan, 2017. "Multi-Contextual Segregation and Environmental Justice Research: Toward Fine-Scale Spatiotemporal Approaches," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, October.
    17. Galen Newman & Tianqi Shi & Zhen Yao & Dongying Li & Garett Sansom & Katie Kirsch & Gaston Casillas & Jennifer Horney, 2020. "Citizen Science-Informed Community Master Planning: Land Use and Built Environment Changes to Increase Flood Resilience and Decrease Contaminant Exposure," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-13, January.
    18. Grant, Don & Jorgenson, Andrew K. & Longhofer, Wesley, 2016. "How organizational and global factors condition the effects of energy efficiency on CO2 emission rebounds among the world's power plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 89-93.
    19. James Boyce, 2001. "From Natural Resources to Natural Assets," Published Studies ps13, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    20. Andrea Hricko & Glovioell Rowland & Sandrah Eckel & Angelo Logan & Maryam Taher & John Wilson, 2014. "Global Trade, Local Impacts: Lessons from California on Health Impacts and Environmental Justice Concerns for Residents Living near Freight Rail Yards," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-28, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:12:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s13412-022-00759-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.