IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jeicoo/v20y2025i1d10.1007_s11403-024-00418-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The new industrial revolution: the optimal choice for flexible work companies

Author

Listed:
  • Leonardo Becchetti

    (University of Rome Tor Vergata)

  • Francesco Salustri

    (University of Roma Tre)

  • Nazaria Solferino

    (University of Calabria)

Abstract

The mandatory shift to remote work during the COVID-19 pandemic has made employers and employees increasingly aware of the productivity benefits that may arise from the digital revolution. To explore the characteristics of these gains, we build a model that enables companies to choose from three types of relationship inputs: face-to-face, remote synchronous, and remote asynchronous. Once remote interactions are included, five factors influencing job satisfaction and therefore worker productivity can be identified: (i) reduced mobility, (ii) interaction frequency, (iii) optimal time/place, (iv) work-life balance, and (v) relationship decay effects. We compute the optimal distribution of the three relationship types that maximize corporate profits, conditioning on reasonable parametric assumptions on these five effects. Additionally, we evaluate the potential productivity growth for companies employing only face-to-face interactions when introducing remote interactions. We test our theoretical predictions with a Structural Equation Model, revealing that remote work enhances worker satisfaction and willingness to contribute additional effort at the same wage. Our empirical findings have relevant implications for industrial and environmental policies at both national and supranational levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Leonardo Becchetti & Francesco Salustri & Nazaria Solferino, 2025. "The new industrial revolution: the optimal choice for flexible work companies," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 20(1), pages 237-271, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jeicoo:v:20:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11403-024-00418-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11403-024-00418-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11403-024-00418-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11403-024-00418-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas Bloom & James Liang & John Roberts & Zhichun Jenny Ying, 2015. "Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 130(1), pages 165-218.
    2. Akerlof, George A, 1984. "Gift Exchange and Efficiency-Wage Theory: Four Views," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 74(2), pages 79-83, May.
    3. Audronė Nakrošienė & Ilona Bučiūnienė & Bernadeta Goštautaitė, 2019. "Working from home: characteristics and outcomes of telework," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 40(1), pages 87-101, January.
    4. Geraci, Andrea & Nardotto, Mattia & Reggiani, Tommaso & Sabatini, Fabio, 2022. "Broadband Internet and social capital," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    5. Giorgio Calcagnini & Germana Giombini & Giuseppe Travaglini, 2021. "The Productivity Gap Among Major European Countries, USA and Japan," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 7(1), pages 59-78, March.
    6. K M Abilash & Nitha Mary Siju, 2021. "Telecommuting: An Empirical Study on Job Performance, Job Satisfaction and Employees Commitment during Pandemic Circumstances," Shanlax International Journal of Management, Shanlax Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 1-10, January.
    7. Freeman, Richard B, 1997. "Working for Nothing: The Supply of Volunteer Labor," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 15(1), pages 140-166, January.
    8. George A. Akerlof, 1982. "Labor Contracts as Partial Gift Exchange," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 97(4), pages 543-569.
    9. Roberto Gallardo & Brian Whitacre, 2018. "21st century economic development: Telework and its impact on local income," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(2), pages 103-123, June.
    10. Erte Xiao & Daniel Houser, 2005. "Emotion expression in human punishment behavior," Experimental 0504003, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 18 May 2005.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Becchetti, Leonardo & Salustri, Francesco & Solferino, Nazaria, 2022. "The new industrial revolution: The optimal choice for flexible work companies," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1087, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    2. Dinkelman, Taryn & Ranchhod, Vimal, 2012. "Evidence on the impact of minimum wage laws in an informal sector: Domestic workers in South Africa," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 27-45.
    3. Acevedo Rueda, Rafael Alexis & Sanchez, Yasmin, 2013. "El consumo, ingreso y ahorro del Venezolano: un primer análisis descriptivo de la V República [Venezuelan's consumption, incomes and savning: a first descriptive analysis of the V Republic]," MPRA Paper 58211, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2014.
    4. Bénédicte Reynaud, 1993. "Les théories de l'équité, fondements d'une approche cognitive du salaire d'efficience," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 44(1), pages 5-22.
    5. Arianna Dal Forno & Ugo Merlone, 2021. "Envy effects on conflict dynamics in supervised work groups," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 44(2), pages 755-779, December.
    6. Dariel, Aurelie & Riedl, Arno & Siegenthaler, Simon, 2021. "Referral hiring and wage formation in a market with adverse selection," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 109-130.
    7. van den Berg, Gerard J. & Kesternich, Iris & Müller, Gerrit & Siflinger, Bettina M., 2024. "Reciprocity and the interaction between the unemployed and the caseworker," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    8. Sara Lemos, 2004. "A Menu of Minimum Wage Variables for Evaluating Wages and Employment Effects: Evidence from Brazil," Discussion Papers in Economics 04/3, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.
    9. Singh, Prakarsh & Masters, William A., 2017. "Impact of caregiver incentives on child health: Evidence from an experiment with Anganwadi workers in India," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 219-231.
    10. Sprinkle, Geoffrey B., 2003. "Perspectives on experimental research in managerial accounting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 287-318.
    11. Monteiro, Natália P. & Straume, Odd Rune & Valente, Marieta, 2021. "When does remote electronic access (not) boost productivity? Longitudinal evidence from Portugal," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    12. Matthew Rabin., 1997. "Bargaining Structure, Fairness and Efficiency," Economics Working Papers E00-280, University of California at Berkeley.
    13. Matthias Heinz & Sabrina Jeworrek & Vanessa Mertins & Heiner Schumacher & Matthias Sutter, 2017. "Measuring Indirect Effects of Unfair Employer Behavior on Worker Productivity – A Field Experiment," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2017_22, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    14. Natália P. Monteiro & Odd Rune Straume & Marieta Valente, 2019. "Does Remote Work Improve or Impair Firm Labour Productivity? Longitudinal Evidence from Portugal," CESifo Working Paper Series 7991, CESifo.
    15. Jung-Seung Yang, 2022. "Dynamics of Firm’s Investment in Education and Training: An Agent-based Approach," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 60(4), pages 1317-1351, December.
    16. Gagnon, Nickolas & Noussair, C., 2016. "Does Reciprocity Persist Over Time?," Research Memorandum 033, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    17. Bernard Guéry, 2016. "Le travail comme échange chez Saint-Exupéry : penser l’articulation des trois dimensions du travail," Post-Print hal-02508868, HAL.
    18. Sonia R Bhalotra, 1998. "Investigating Rationality in Wage-Setting," STICERD - Development Economics Papers - From 2008 this series has been superseded by Economic Organisation and Public Policy Discussion Papers 10, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    19. Al-Najjar, Nabil I., 2001. "A reputational model of authority," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 165-191, October.
    20. Nakamura, Masao & Hubler, Olaf, 1998. "The bonus share of flexible pay in Germany, Japan and the US: Some empirical regularities," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 221-232, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Flexible work; Remote work; Digital relationship; Productivity; Structural equation model;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jeicoo:v:20:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11403-024-00418-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.