IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcsosc/v7y2024i3d10.1007_s42001-024-00315-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social influence dynamics for image segmentation: a novel pixel interaction approach

Author

Listed:
  • Erik Cuevas

    (Universidad de Guadalajara, CUCEI)

  • Alberto Luque

    (Universidad de Guadalajara, CUCEI)

  • Fernando Vega

    (Universidad de Guadalajara, CUCEI)

  • Daniel Zaldívar

    (Universidad de Guadalajara, CUCEI)

  • Jesús López

    (Universidad de Guadalajara, CUCEI)

Abstract

This paper introduces a novel image segmentation technique that is inspired by social influence and opinion dynamics, establishing an association between social sciences and image analysis. This methodology analogizes each pixel in an image to an individual within a population, where the intensity of the pixel reflects an individual’s opinion. By simulating social influence through iterative interactions among individual pixels, our approach emulates the interaction patterns observed in human populations. During each interaction, a pixel selects another pixel within its immediate neighborhood to compare opinions or intensity levels. If the intensities are similar, indicative of analogous opinions, we adjust their values to minimize the difference, thereby producing the formation of homogenous regions within the image. Conversely, when the intensity difference between the two pixels is significant, we manipulate the intensity of both pixels to accentuate this disparity and effectively segregate the regions within the image. After several iterations, the objects in the image tended to split according to the homogeneity of their intensities. The efficacy of the proposed technique was tested using several images and widely accepted quality metrics. The results of these experiments show that the proposed method achieves competitive performance compared to other segmentation techniques.

Suggested Citation

  • Erik Cuevas & Alberto Luque & Fernando Vega & Daniel Zaldívar & Jesús López, 2024. "Social influence dynamics for image segmentation: a novel pixel interaction approach," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 2613-2642, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:7:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s42001-024-00315-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s42001-024-00315-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42001-024-00315-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s42001-024-00315-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xi Chen & Xiao Zhang & Yong Xie & Wei Li, 2017. "Opinion Dynamics of Social-Similarity-Based Hegselmann–Krause Model," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-12, December.
    2. F. Slanina & H. Lavicka, 2003. "Analytical results for the Sznajd model of opinion formation," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 35(2), pages 279-288, September.
    3. Jun Ma & Yuting He & Feifei Li & Lin Han & Chenyu You & Bo Wang, 2024. "Segment anything in medical images," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, December.
    4. Dino Carpentras & Paul J. Maher & Caoimhe O'Reilly & Michael Quayle, 2022. "Deriving an Opinion Dynamics Model from Experimental Data," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 25(4), pages 1-4.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kozitsin, Ivan V., 2024. "Optimal control in opinion dynamics models: diversity of influence mechanisms and complex influence hierarchies," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    2. Piotr Przybyła & Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron & Rafał Weron, 2014. "Diffusion Of Innovation Within An Agent-Based Model: Spinsons, Independence And Advertising," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-22.
    3. Guzmán-Vargas, L. & Hernández-Pérez, R., 2006. "Small-world topology and memory effects on decision time in opinion dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 372(2), pages 326-332.
    4. Fang, Siwei & Zhao, Nan & Chen, Nan & Xiong, Fei & Yi, Yunhui, 2019. "Analyzing and predicting network public opinion evolution based on group persuasion force of populism," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 525(C), pages 809-824.
    5. Lücke, Marvin & Heitzig, Jobst & Koltai, Péter & Molkenthin, Nora & Winkelmann, Stefanie, 2023. "Large population limits of Markov processes on random networks," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    6. Oded Rotem & Tamar Schwartz & Ron Maor & Yishay Tauber & Maya Tsarfati Shapiro & Marcos Meseguer & Daniella Gilboa & Daniel S. Seidman & Assaf Zaritsky, 2024. "Visual interpretability of image-based classification models by generative latent space disentanglement applied to in vitro fertilization," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Grabowski, A. & Kosiński, R.A., 2006. "Ising-based model of opinion formation in a complex network of interpersonal interactions," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 361(2), pages 651-664.
    8. Czaplicka, Agnieszka & Charalambous, Christos & Toral, Raul & San Miguel, Maxi, 2022. "Biased-voter model: How persuasive a small group can be?," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    9. Düring, B. & Toscani, G., 2007. "Hydrodynamics from kinetic models of conservative economies," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 384(2), pages 493-506.
    10. Pérez-Llanos, Mayte & Pinasco, Juan Pablo & Saintier, Nicolas, 2020. "Opinion attractiveness and its effect in opinion formation models," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 559(C).
    11. Xi Chen & Shen Zhao & Wei Li, 2019. "Opinion Dynamics Model Based on Cognitive Styles: Field-Dependence and Field-Independence," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-12, February.
    12. Jin, Cheng & Li, Yifu & Jin, Xiaogang, 2017. "Political opinion formation: Initial opinion distribution and individual heterogeneity of tolerance," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 467(C), pages 257-266.
    13. Shang, Lihui & Zhao, Mingming & Ai, Jun & Su, Zhan, 2021. "Opinion evolution in the Sznajd model on interdependent chains," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 565(C).
    14. Bertram During & Nicos Georgiou & Enrico Scalas, 2016. "A stylized model for wealth distribution," Papers 1609.08978, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    15. Huang, Changwei & Hou, Yongzhao & Han, Wenchen, 2023. "Coevolution of consensus and cooperation in evolutionary Hegselmann–Krause dilemma with the cooperation cost," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    16. Galam, Serge, 2010. "Public debates driven by incomplete scientific data: The cases of evolution theory, global warming and H1N1 pandemic influenza," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(17), pages 3619-3631.
    17. Grabowski, Andrzej, 2009. "Opinion formation in a social network: The role of human activity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 388(6), pages 961-966.
    18. Sven Banischa & Ricardo Lima & Tanya Araújo, 2012. "Agent based models and opinion dynamics as markov chains," Working Papers Department of Economics 2012/10, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Department of Economics, Universidade de Lisboa.
    19. Pawel Sobkowicz, 2009. "Modelling Opinion Formation with Physics Tools: Call for Closer Link with Reality," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11.
    20. Zhong, Yue & Lai, Shaoyong & Hu, Chunhua, 2021. "Investigations to the dynamics of wealth distribution in a kinetic exchange model," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 404(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:7:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s42001-024-00315-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.