IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v361y2006i2p651-664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ising-based model of opinion formation in a complex network of interpersonal interactions

Author

Listed:
  • Grabowski, A.
  • Kosiński, R.A.

Abstract

In our work the process of opinion formation in the human population, treated as a scale-free network, is modeled and investigated numerically. The individuals (nodes of the network) are characterized by their authorities, which influence the interpersonal interactions in the population. Hierarchical, two-level structures of interpersonal interactions and spatial localization of individuals are taken into account. The effect of the mass media, modeled as an external stimulation acting on the social network, on the process of opinion formation is investigated. It was found that in the time evolution of opinions of individuals critical phenomena occur. The first one is observed in the critical temperature of the system TC and is connected with the situation in the community, which may be described by such quantifiers as the economic status of people, unemployment or crime wave. Another critical phenomenon is connected with the influence of mass media on the population. As results from our computations, under certain circumstances the mass media can provoke critical rebuilding of opinions in the population.

Suggested Citation

  • Grabowski, A. & Kosiński, R.A., 2006. "Ising-based model of opinion formation in a complex network of interpersonal interactions," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 361(2), pages 651-664.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:361:y:2006:i:2:p:651-664
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2005.06.102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437105007296
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2005.06.102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schulze, Christian, 2003. "Long-range interactions in Sznajd consensus model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 324(3), pages 717-722.
    2. Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron & Józef Sznajd, 2000. "Opinion Evolution In Closed Community," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(06), pages 1157-1165.
    3. Proykova, Ana & Stauffer, Dietrich, 2002. "Social percolation and the influence of mass media," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 312(1), pages 300-304.
    4. Kacperski, Krzysztof & Hołyst, Janusz A., 2000. "Phase transitions as a persistent feature of groups with leaders in models of opinion formation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 631-643.
    5. Indekeu, J.O., 2004. "Special attention network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 333(C), pages 461-464.
    6. F. Slanina & H. Lavicka, 2003. "Analytical results for the Sznajd model of opinion formation," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 35(2), pages 279-288, September.
    7. Galam, Serge, 2004. "Contrarian deterministic effects on opinion dynamics: “the hung elections scenario”," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 333(C), pages 453-460.
    8. Aleksiejuk, Agata & Hołyst, Janusz A. & Stauffer, Dietrich, 2002. "Ferromagnetic phase transition in Barabási–Albert networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 310(1), pages 260-266.
    9. Sabatelli, Lorenzo & Richmond, Peter, 2004. "Non-monotonic spontaneous magnetization in a Sznajd-like consensus model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 334(1), pages 274-280.
    10. Steven H. Strogatz, 2001. "Exploring complex networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 410(6825), pages 268-276, March.
    11. Hołyst, Janusz A. & Kacperski, Krzysztof & Schweitzer, Frank, 2000. "Phase transitions in social impact models of opinion formation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 285(1), pages 199-210.
    12. Ben-Naim, E & Krapivsky, P.L & Vazquez, F & Redner, S, 2003. "Unity and discord in opinion dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 330(1), pages 99-106.
    13. Stauffer, D. & Sá Martins, J.S., 2004. "Simulation of Galam's contrarian opinions on percolative lattices," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 334(3), pages 558-565.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bertotti, Maria Letizia & Modanese, Giovanni, 2011. "From microscopic taxation and redistribution models to macroscopic income distributions," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(21), pages 3782-3793.
    2. Grabowski, Andrzej, 2009. "Opinion formation in a social network: The role of human activity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 388(6), pages 961-966.
    3. Laciana, Carlos E. & Rovere, Santiago L., 2011. "Ising-like agent-based technology diffusion model: Adoption patterns vs. seeding strategies," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(6), pages 1139-1149.
    4. D. Sornette, 2014. "Physics and Financial Economics (1776-2014): Puzzles, Ising and Agent-Based models," Papers 1404.0243, arXiv.org.
    5. Drechsler, Martin, 2023. "Ising models to study effects of risk aversion in socially interacting individuals," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 632(P1).
    6. Manfred Füllsack & Simon Plakolb & Georg Jäger, 2021. "Predicting regime shifts in social systems modelled with agent-based methods," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 163-185, May.
    7. Di Benedetto, Andrea & Wieners, Claudia E. & Dijkstra, Henk A. & Stoof, Henk T.C., 2023. "Media preference increases polarization in an agent-based election model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 626(C).
    8. Li, Tingyu & Zhu, Hengmin, 2020. "Effect of the media on the opinion dynamics in online social networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 551(C).
    9. Snellman, Jan E. & Barrio, Rafael A. & Kaski, Kimmo K., 2021. "Social structure formation in a network of agents playing a hybrid of ultimatum and dictator games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 561(C).
    10. Laciana, Carlos E. & Oteiza-Aguirre, Nicolás, 2014. "An agent based multi-optional model for the diffusion of innovations," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 394(C), pages 254-265.
    11. Maria Letizia Bertotti & Giovanni Modanese, 2011. "From microscopic taxation and redistribution models to macroscopic income distributions," Papers 1109.0606, arXiv.org.
    12. Didier SORNETTE, 2014. "Physics and Financial Economics (1776-2014): Puzzles, Ising and Agent-Based Models," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 14-25, Swiss Finance Institute.
    13. Manfred Füllsack & Daniel Reisinger & Marie Kapeller & Georg Jäger, 2022. "Early warning signals from the periphery," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 665-685, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grabowski, Andrzej, 2009. "Opinion formation in a social network: The role of human activity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 388(6), pages 961-966.
    2. Sznajd-Weron, Katarzyna & Sznajd, Józef & Weron, Tomasz, 2021. "A review on the Sznajd model — 20 years after," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 565(C).
    3. Piotr Przybyła & Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron & Rafał Weron, 2014. "Diffusion Of Innovation Within An Agent-Based Model: Spinsons, Independence And Advertising," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-22.
    4. Czaplicka, Agnieszka & Charalambous, Christos & Toral, Raul & San Miguel, Maxi, 2022. "Biased-voter model: How persuasive a small group can be?," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    5. María Cecilia Gimenez & Luis Reinaudi & Ana Pamela Paz-García & Paulo Marcelo Centres & Antonio José Ramirez-Pastor, 2021. "Opinion evolution in the presence of constant propaganda: homogeneous and localized cases," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 94(1), pages 1-11, January.
    6. Schweitzer, Frank & Zimmermann, Jörg & Mühlenbein, Heinz, 2002. "Coordination of decisions in a spatial agent model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 189-216.
    7. Gimenez, M.C. & Revelli, J.A. & Lama, M.S. de la & Lopez, J.M. & Wio, H.S., 2013. "Interplay between social debate and propaganda in an opinion formation model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(1), pages 278-286.
    8. Pawel Sobkowicz, 2009. "Modelling Opinion Formation with Physics Tools: Call for Closer Link with Reality," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11.
    9. Dimitris Tsintsaris & Milan Tsompanoglou & Evangelos Ioannidis, 2024. "Dynamics of Social Influence and Knowledge in Networks: Sociophysics Models and Applications in Social Trading, Behavioral Finance and Business," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-27, April.
    10. Hang-Hyun Jo & Jeoung-Yoo Kim, 2012. "Competitive Targeted Marketing," ISER Discussion Paper 0834, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    11. Guzmán-Vargas, L. & Hernández-Pérez, R., 2006. "Small-world topology and memory effects on decision time in opinion dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 372(2), pages 326-332.
    12. Tiwari, Mukesh & Yang, Xiguang & Sen, Surajit, 2021. "Modeling the nonlinear effects of opinion kinematics in elections: A simple Ising model with random field based study," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 582(C).
    13. Katarzyna Ostasiewicz & Michal H. Tyc & Piotr Goliczewski & Piotr Magnuszewski & Andrzej Radosz & Jan Sendzimir, 2006. "Integrating economic and psychological insights in binary choice models with social interactions," Papers physics/0609170, arXiv.org.
    14. Michel Grabisch & Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2020. "A Survey on Nonstrategic Models of Opinion Dynamics," Games, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-29, December.
    15. Sabatelli, Lorenzo & Richmond, Peter, 2004. "A consensus-based dynamics for market volumes," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 344(1), pages 62-66.
    16. Jędrzejewski, Arkadiusz & Sznajd-Weron, Katarzyna, 2018. "Impact of memory on opinion dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 505(C), pages 306-315.
    17. Quanbo Zha & Gang Kou & Hengjie Zhang & Haiming Liang & Xia Chen & Cong-Cong Li & Yucheng Dong, 2020. "Opinion dynamics in finance and business: a literature review and research opportunities," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-22, December.
    18. Boudin, Laurent & Mercier, Aurore & Salvarani, Francesco, 2012. "Conciliatory and contradictory dynamics in opinion formation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(22), pages 5672-5684.
    19. Qian, Shen & Liu, Yijun & Galam, Serge, 2015. "Activeness as a key to counter democratic balance," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 432(C), pages 187-196.
    20. Gündüç, Semra & Eryiğit, Recep, 2015. "The role of persuasion power on the consensus formation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 426(C), pages 16-24.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:361:y:2006:i:2:p:651-664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.