IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcsosc/v5y2022i1d10.1007_s42001-021-00116-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A network view on reliability: using machine learning to understand how we assess news websites

Author

Listed:
  • Tobias Blanke

    (University of Amsterdam)

  • Tommaso Venturini

    (CNRS)

Abstract

This article shows how a machine can employ a network view to reason about complex social relations of news reliability. Such a network view promises a topic-agnostic perspective that can be a useful hint on reliability trends and their heterogeneous assumptions. In our analysis, we depart from the ever-growing numbers of papers trying to find machine learning algorithms to predict the reliability of news and focus instead on using machine reasoning to understand the structure of news networks by comparing it with our human judgements. Understanding and representing news networks is not easy, not only because they can be extremely vast but also because they are shaped by several overlapping network dynamics. We present a machine learning approach to analyse what constitutes reliable news from the view of a network. Our aim is to machine-read a network’s understanding of news reliability. To analyse real-life news sites, we used the Décodex dataset to train machine learning models from the structure of the underlying network. We then employ the models to draw conclusions how the Décodex evaluators came to assess the reliability of news.

Suggested Citation

  • Tobias Blanke & Tommaso Venturini, 2022. "A network view on reliability: using machine learning to understand how we assess news websites," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 69-88, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:5:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s42001-021-00116-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s42001-021-00116-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42001-021-00116-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s42001-021-00116-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Réka Albert & Hawoong Jeong & Albert-László Barabási, 1999. "Diameter of the World-Wide Web," Nature, Nature, vol. 401(6749), pages 130-131, September.
    2. Marc Keuschnigg & Niclas Lovsjö & Peter Hedström, 2018. "Analytical sociology and computational social science," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 3-14, January.
    3. Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia, 2018. "Fighting fake news: a role for computational social science in the fight against digital misinformation," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 147-153, January.
    4. Zekić-Sušac Marijana & Pfeifer Sanja & Šarlija Nataša, 2014. "A Comparison of Machine Learning Methods in a High-Dimensional Classification Problem," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 5(3), pages 82-96, September.
    5. Bilal Naeem & Aymen Khan & Mirza Omer Beg & Hasan Mujtaba, 2020. "A deep learning framework for clickbait detection on social area network using natural language cues," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 231-243, April.
    6. Babak Ravandi & Fatma Mili, 2019. "Coherence and polarization in complex networks," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 133-150, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohd-Zaid, Fairul & Kabban, Christine M. Schubert & Deckro, Richard F. & White, Edward D., 2017. "Parameter specification for the degree distribution of simulated Barabási–Albert graphs," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 465(C), pages 141-152.
    2. He, He & Yang, Bo & Hu, Xiaoming, 2016. "Exploring community structure in networks by consensus dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 450(C), pages 342-353.
    3. Roger D. Magarey & Christina M. Trexler, 2020. "Information: a missing component in understanding and mitigating social epidemics," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Elias Carroni & Paolo Pin & Simone Righi, 2020. "Bring a Friend! Privately or Publicly?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(5), pages 2269-2290, May.
    5. Duan, Shuyu & Wen, Tao & Jiang, Wen, 2019. "A new information dimension of complex network based on Rényi entropy," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 516(C), pages 529-542.
    6. Baek, Seung Ki & Kim, Tae Young & Kim, Beom Jun, 2008. "Testing a priority-based queue model with Linux command histories," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 387(14), pages 3660-3668.
    7. Freddy Hernán Cepeda López, 2008. "La topología de redes como herramienta de seguimiento en el Sistema de Pagos de Alto Valor en Colombia," Borradores de Economia 513, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    8. Chung-Yuan Huang & Chuen-Tsai Sun & Hsun-Cheng Lin, 2005. "Influence of Local Information on Social Simulations in Small-World Network Models," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 8(4), pages 1-8.
    9. Xue Guo & Hu Zhang & Tianhai Tian, 2019. "Multi-Likelihood Methods for Developing Stock Relationship Networks Using Financial Big Data," Papers 1906.08088, arXiv.org.
    10. Chang, Chia-ling & Chen, Shu-heng, 2011. "Interactions in DSGE models: The Boltzmann-Gibbs machine and social networks approach," Economics Discussion Papers 2011-25, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    11. Lin, Yi & Zhang, Jianwei & Yang, Bo & Liu, Hong & Zhao, Liping, 2019. "An optimal routing strategy for transport networks with minimal transmission cost and high network capacity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 521(C), pages 551-561.
    12. Stefano Breschi & Lucia Cusmano, 2002. "Unveiling the Texture of a European Research Area: Emergence of Oligarchic Networks under EU Framework Programmes," KITeS Working Papers 130, KITeS, Centre for Knowledge, Internationalization and Technology Studies, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy, revised Jul 2002.
    13. He, Xuan & Zhao, Hai & Cai, Wei & Li, Guang-Guang & Pei, Fan-Dong, 2015. "Analyzing the structure of earthquake network by k-core decomposition," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 421(C), pages 34-43.
    14. Huang, Huilin, 2009. "The degree sequences of an asymmetrical growing network," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(4), pages 420-425, February.
    15. Gianluca Carnabuci, 2013. "The distribution of technological progress," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 1143-1154, June.
    16. Zhengzheng Pan, 2012. "Opinions and Networks: How Do They Effect Each Other," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 39(2), pages 157-171, February.
    17. Laurienti, Paul J. & Joyce, Karen E. & Telesford, Qawi K. & Burdette, Jonathan H. & Hayasaka, Satoru, 2011. "Universal fractal scaling of self-organized networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(20), pages 3608-3613.
    18. Chen, Qinghua & Shi, Dinghua, 2004. "The modeling of scale-free networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 335(1), pages 240-248.
    19. Feng Xie & David Levinson, 2009. "Modeling the Growth of Transportation Networks: A Comprehensive Review," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 291-307, September.
    20. Srayan Datta & Eytan Adar, 2018. "A generative model for scientific concept hierarchies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:5:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s42001-021-00116-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.