IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v45y2023i1d10.1007_s10878-022-00984-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

RETRACTED ARTICLE: The mechanism and test of the impact of environmental regulation and technological innovation on high quality development

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao-Hong Shi

    (Anhui University of Finance and Economics)

  • Xiao Chen

    (Anhui University of Finance and Economics)

  • Li Han

    (Anhui University of Finance and Economics)

  • Ze-Jiong Zhou

    (Anhui University of Finance and Economics)

Abstract

Environmental regulation and technological innovation are two important measures to realize high-quality economic development under the current "double cycle" new development pattern in our country. Exploring the mechanism of environmental regulation and technological innovation on high-quality economic development is of great significance to realize high-quality economic development. Firstly, analyze the theoretical mechanism that technological innovation and environmental regulation affect the high-quality development of economy, and put forward the theoretical hypothesis that technological innovation, environmental regulation and their interaction items can promote the high-quality development of economy; Secondly, construct the measurement index system of the high-quality development level of economy based on the new development concept, measure the high-quality development level of economy, and find that the high-quality development level of economy in the whole country is on the rise year by year, with great differences between regions, it presents the characteristics of the eastern region > the central region > the western region; Once again, the fixed effect model is adopted to explore the impact of environmental regulation and technological innovation on high-quality economic development at the national level and the eastern, central and western regions. The results show that environmental regulation and technological innovation not only have independent effect, but also have synergistic effect of mutual promotion on high-quality economic development, and the impact of the two on high-quality economic development has regional heterogeneity. At last, some countermeasures and suggestions are put forward: increase the investment in technological innovation, improve the backward effect of environmental regulations on high-quality economic development, at the same time, pay attention to the coordinated development of environmental regulations and technological innovation, and promote high-quality economic development in both ways.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao-Hong Shi & Xiao Chen & Li Han & Ze-Jiong Zhou, 2023. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: The mechanism and test of the impact of environmental regulation and technological innovation on high quality development," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 1-28, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:45:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10878-022-00984-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10878-022-00984-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-022-00984-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10878-022-00984-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ferreira, Francisco H.G. & Leite, Phillippe G. & Ravallion, Martin, 2010. "Poverty reduction without economic growth?: Explaining Brazil's poverty dynamics, 1985-2004," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 20-36, September.
    2. Die Li & Sumin Hu, 2021. "How Does Technological Innovation Mediate the Relationship between Environmental Regulation and High-Quality Economic Development? Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Youyuan Zheng & Zhou Zhou & Fan Zhou, 2024. "The Non-Linear Effect of Dual Environmental Regulation on Urban Green Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from 284 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Shaohui Zhang & Zhongxian Han & Mingwei Guo, 2024. "FDI, new development philosophy and China’s high-quality economic development," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(10), pages 25227-25255, October.
    3. Jing Deng & Tiantian Chen & Yun Zhang, 2023. "Effect of Collaborative Innovation on High-Quality Economic Development in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Urban Agglomeration—An Empirical Analysis Based on the Spatial Durbin Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Fei Liu & Genyu Zhang & Chenghao Li & Tao Ren & Donato Masi, 2023. "Analysis of the Temporal and Spatial Pattern and Convergence Characteristics of High-Quality Sustainable Economic Development of Urban Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-24, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alkire, Sabina & Roche, José Manuel & Vaz, Ana, 2017. "Changes Over Time in Multidimensional Poverty: Methodology and Results for 34 Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 232-249.
    2. Luc Christiaensen & Joachim Weerdt & Yasuyuki Todo, 2013. "Urbanization and poverty reduction: the role of rural diversification and secondary towns," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 44(4-5), pages 435-447, July.
    3. Pinelopi Koujianou Goldberg & Tristan Reed, 2023. "Presidential Address: Demand‐Side Constraints in Development. The Role of Market Size, Trade, and (In)Equality," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(6), pages 1915-1950, November.
    4. Ferreira , Francisco H. G., 2010. "Distributions in motion: economic growth, inequality, and poverty dynamics," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5424, The World Bank.
    5. Arias-Vazquez , Francisco Javier & Lee, Jean N. & Newhouse, David, 2012. "The role of sectoral growth patterns in labor market development," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6250, The World Bank.
    6. Erumban, Abdul A. & de Vries, Gaaitzen J., 2024. "Structural change and poverty reduction in developing economies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    7. Francisco H. G. Ferreira & Anna Fruttero & Phillippe G. Leite & Leonardo R. Lucchetti, 2013. "Rising Food Prices and Household Welfare: Evidence from Brazil in 2008," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(1), pages 151-176, February.
    8. Marta Castilho & Marta Menéndez & Aude A. Sztulman, 2015. "Poverty and Inequality Dynamics in Manaus: Legacy of a Free Trade Zone?," Working Papers halshs-01245394, HAL.
    9. Ravallion, Martin, 2009. "Are There Lessons for Africa from China's Success Against Poverty?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 303-313, February.
    10. Alfonso Novales Cinca, 2022. "Desigualdad: una revisión actualizada [Inequality: Un updated review]," Documentos de Trabajo del ICAE 2022-02, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico.
    11. Barrientos, Armando & Amann, Ed, 2014. "Is there a Brazilian model of development? Are there lessons for countries in Africa?," WIDER Working Paper Series 134, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    12. Campagnolo, Lorenza & Davide, Marinella, 2019. "Can the Paris deal boost SDGs achievement? An assessment of climate mitigation co-benefits or side-effects on poverty and inequality," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 96-109.
    13. Manuel Vanegas Sr & William Gartner & Benjamin Senauer, 2015. "Tourism and Poverty Reduction: An Economic Sector Analysis for Costa Rica and Nicaragua," Tourism Economics, , vol. 21(1), pages 159-182, February.
    14. Sean Higgins & Nora Lustig & Whitney Ruble & Timothy M. Smeeding, 2016. "Comparing the Incidence of Taxes and Social Spending in Brazil and the United States," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 62(S1), pages 22-46, August.
    15. Alaa Othman & Sara El Gazzar & Matjaz Knez, 2022. "Investigating the Influences of Smart Port Practices and Technology Employment on Port Sustainable Performance: The Egypt Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, October.
    16. Louisiana Cavalcanti Teixeira, 2020. "Trade Liberalization, Income, and Multidimensional Deprivation in Brazil," Working Papers hal-02997100, HAL.
    17. Guillermo Cruces & Gary S. Fields & David Jaume & Mariana Viollaz, 2015. "The growth-employment-poverty nexus in Latin America in the 2000s: Brazil country study," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2015-71, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    18. Castilho, Marta & Menéndez, Marta & Sztulman, Aude, 2012. "Trade Liberalization, Inequality, and Poverty in Brazilian States," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 821-835.
    19. Mthuli Ncube & Zuzana Brixiova & Zorobabel Bicaba, 2014. "Can Dreams Come True? Eliminating Extreme Poverty In Africa By 2030," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series wp1076, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    20. Panagiotis ARTELARIS & George KANDYLIS, 2014. "Mapping Poverty At Regional Level In Greece," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 39, pages 131-147.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:45:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10878-022-00984-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.