IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v28y2014i1d10.1007_s10878-014-9710-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A hybrid biased random key genetic algorithm approach for the unit commitment problem

Author

Listed:
  • L. A. C. Roque

    (Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto)

  • D. B. M. M. Fontes

    (Universidade do Porto)

  • F. A. C. C. Fontes

    (Universidade do Porto)

Abstract

This work proposes a hybrid genetic algorithm (GA) to address the unit commitment (UC) problem. In the UC problem, the goal is to schedule a subset of a given group of electrical power generating units and also to determine their production output in order to meet energy demands at minimum cost. In addition, the solution must satisfy a set of technological and operational constraints. The algorithm developed is a hybrid biased random key genetic algorithm (HBRKGA). It uses random keys to encode the solutions and introduces bias both in the parent selection procedure and in the crossover strategy. To intensify the search close to good solutions, the GA is hybridized with local search. Tests have been performed on benchmark large-scale power systems. The computational results demonstrate that the HBRKGA is effective and efficient. In addition, it is also shown that it improves the solutions obtained by current state-of-the-art methodologies.

Suggested Citation

  • L. A. C. Roque & D. B. M. M. Fontes & F. A. C. C. Fontes, 2014. "A hybrid biased random key genetic algorithm approach for the unit commitment problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 140-166, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:28:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1007_s10878-014-9710-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10878-014-9710-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-014-9710-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10878-014-9710-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gonçalves, J.F. & Mendes, J.J.M. & Resende, M.G.C., 2008. "A genetic algorithm for the resource constrained multi-project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(3), pages 1171-1190, September.
    2. Antonio Frangioni & Claudio Gentile, 2006. "Solving Nonlinear Single-Unit Commitment Problems with Ramping Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 767-775, August.
    3. Dang, Chuangyin & Li, Minqiang, 2007. "A floating-point genetic algorithm for solving the unit commitment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(3), pages 1370-1395, September.
    4. Jonathan F. Bard, 1988. "Short-Term Scheduling of Thermal-Electric Generators Using Lagrangian Relaxation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 756-766, October.
    5. I. S. Kotsireas & C. Koukouvinos & P. M. Pardalos & D. E. Simos, 2012. "Competent genetic algorithms for weighing matrices," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 508-525, November.
    6. Sourirajan, Karthik & Ozsen, Leyla & Uzsoy, Reha, 2009. "A genetic algorithm for a single product network design model with lead time and safety stock considerations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 599-608, September.
    7. M. Ericsson & M.G.C. Resende & P.M. Pardalos, 2002. "A Genetic Algorithm for the Weight Setting Problem in OSPF Routing," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 299-333, September.
    8. John A. Muckstadt & Sherri A. Koenig, 1977. "An Application of Lagrangian Relaxation to Scheduling in Power-Generation Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 387-403, June.
    9. James C. Bean, 1994. "Genetic Algorithms and Random Keys for Sequencing and Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 154-160, May.
    10. Rong, Aiying & Hakonen, Henri & Lahdelma, Risto, 2008. "A variant of the dynamic programming algorithm for unit commitment of combined heat and power systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(3), pages 741-755, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Julliany S. Brandão & Thiago F. Noronha & Celso C. Ribeiro, 2016. "A biased random-key genetic algorithm to maximize the number of accepted lightpaths in WDM optical networks," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 65(4), pages 813-835, August.
    2. Luís A. C. Roque & Dalila B. M. M. Fontes & Fernando A. C. C. Fontes, 2017. "A Metaheuristic Approach to the Multi-Objective Unit Commitment Problem Combining Economic and Environmental Criteria," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, December.
    3. H. Faria & M. G. C. Resende & D. Ernst, 2017. "A biased random key genetic algorithm applied to the electric distribution network reconfiguration problem," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 533-550, December.
    4. Dalila B. M. M. Fontes & S. Mahdi Homayouni, 2023. "A bi-objective multi-population biased random key genetic algorithm for joint scheduling quay cranes and speed adjustable vehicles in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 241-268, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ayşegül Altın & Bernard Fortz & Mikkel Thorup & Hakan Ümit, 2013. "Intra-domain traffic engineering with shortest path routing protocols," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 204(1), pages 65-95, April.
    2. Andrade, Carlos E. & Toso, Rodrigo F. & Gonçalves, José F. & Resende, Mauricio G.C., 2021. "The Multi-Parent Biased Random-Key Genetic Algorithm with Implicit Path-Relinking and its real-world applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(1), pages 17-30.
    3. José Fernando Gonçalves & Mauricio G. C. Resende, 2011. "A parallel multi-population genetic algorithm for a constrained two-dimensional orthogonal packing problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 180-201, August.
    4. Mauricio Resende, 2012. "Biased random-key genetic algorithms with applications in telecommunications," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 20(1), pages 130-153, April.
    5. Luise-Sophie Hoffmann & Carolin Kellenbrink & Stefan Helber, 2020. "Simultaneous structuring and scheduling of multiple projects with flexible project structures," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(5), pages 679-711, June.
    6. R. M. A. Silva & M. G. C. Resende & P. M. Pardalos, 2015. "A Python/C++ library for bound-constrained global optimization using a biased random-key genetic algorithm," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 710-728, October.
    7. Paola Festa & Panos Pardalos, 2012. "Efficient solutions for the far from most string problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 663-682, July.
    8. Fowler, John W. & Mönch, Lars, 2022. "A survey of scheduling with parallel batch (p-batch) processing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 1-24.
    9. Schirmer, Andreas & Riesenberg, Sven, 1997. "Parameterized heuristics for project scheduling: Biased random sampling methods," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 456, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    10. Qingzheng Xu & Na Wang & Lei Wang & Wei Li & Qian Sun, 2021. "Multi-Task Optimization and Multi-Task Evolutionary Computation in the Past Five Years: A Brief Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-44, April.
    11. Xiao, Lei & Zhang, Xinghui & Tang, Junxuan & Zhou, Yaqin, 2020. "Joint optimization of opportunistic maintenance and production scheduling considering batch production mode and varying operational conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    12. J Renaud & F F Boctor & G Laporte, 2004. "Efficient heuristics for Median Cycle Problems," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(2), pages 179-186, February.
    13. Wei Wang & Yaofeng Xu & Liguo Hou, 2019. "Optimal allocation of test times for reliability growth testing with interval-valued model parameters," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(5), pages 791-802, October.
    14. Dalila B. M. M. Fontes & S. Mahdi Homayouni, 2023. "A bi-objective multi-population biased random key genetic algorithm for joint scheduling quay cranes and speed adjustable vehicles in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 241-268, March.
    15. Jun Pei & Bayi Cheng & Xinbao Liu & Panos M. Pardalos & Min Kong, 2019. "Single-machine and parallel-machine serial-batching scheduling problems with position-based learning effect and linear setup time," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 272(1), pages 217-241, January.
    16. Zong-Zhi Lin & James C. Bean & Chelsea C. White, 2004. "A Hybrid Genetic/Optimization Algorithm for Finite-Horizon, Partially Observed Markov Decision Processes," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 27-38, February.
    17. Christos Koulamas, 1997. "Decomposition and hybrid simulated annealing heuristics for the parallel‐machine total tardiness problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(1), pages 109-125, February.
    18. Yanling Chang & Alan Erera & Chelsea White, 2015. "A leader–follower partially observed, multiobjective Markov game," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 235(1), pages 103-128, December.
    19. G I Zobolas & C D Tarantilis & G Ioannou, 2009. "A hybrid evolutionary algorithm for the job shop scheduling problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(2), pages 221-235, February.
    20. Fernanda Nakano Kazama & Aluizio Fausto Ribeiro Araujo & Paulo Barros Correia & Elaine Guerrero-Peña, 2021. "Constraint-guided evolutionary algorithm for solving the winner determination problem," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 1111-1150, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:28:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1007_s10878-014-9710-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.