IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v233y2019i5p791-802.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal allocation of test times for reliability growth testing with interval-valued model parameters

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Wang
  • Yaofeng Xu
  • Liguo Hou

Abstract

Reliability growth testing is widely used to identify and remove failure modes in the development of complex systems. Different models have been proposed to track the progress of reliability growth during test, and previous research has addressed the improvement of after-testing system reliability by allocating limited testing resources. The majority of reliability growth testing models are based on the AMSAA/Crow model with known parameters, but there is a lack of work focusing on the situation when the AMSAA/Crow parameters are subject to uncertainty. In this article, we investigate a reliability growth testing allocation problem to series–parallel systems that considers parameter uncertainty in the AMSAA/Crow models. The model parameters are assumed to be known as uncertain-but-bounded values. Interval arithmetic and an interval order relation reflecting decision maker’s preference are used to analyze the uncertain parameters. In order to determine the optimal allocation of testing time for each component or subsystem aiming to maximize the after-testing system reliability, a modified genetic algorithm is developed. A penalty function is used to handle the testing resource limitations, and the techniques of dual mutation and random keys are used in the algorithm to improve searching efficiency. Computational results indicate that the interval analysis is a useful tool to deal with parameter uncertainty of reliability growth testing allocation problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Wang & Yaofeng Xu & Liguo Hou, 2019. "Optimal allocation of test times for reliability growth testing with interval-valued model parameters," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(5), pages 791-802, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:233:y:2019:i:5:p:791-802
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X19827425
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X19827425
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X19827425?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Byun, Ji-Eun & Noh, Hee-Min & Song, Junho, 2017. "Reliability growth analysis of k-out-of-N systems using matrix-based system reliability method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 410-421.
    2. Van Dyck, Jozef & Verdonck, Tim, 2014. "Precision of power-law NHPP estimates for multiple systems with known failure rate scaling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 143-152.
    3. Ishibuchi, Hisao & Tanaka, Hideo, 1990. "Multiobjective programming in optimization of the interval objective function," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 219-225, September.
    4. Wilson, Kevin J. & Quigley, John, 2016. "Allocation of tasks for reliability growth using multi-attribute utility," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(1), pages 259-271.
    5. Sengupta, Atanu & Pal, Tapan Kumar, 2000. "On comparing interval numbers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 28-43, November.
    6. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. & Safari, J. & Sassani, F., 2008. "Reliability optimization of series-parallel systems with a choice of redundancy strategies using a genetic algorithm," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(4), pages 550-556.
    7. Gaver, Donald P. & Jacobs, Patricia A., 2014. "Reliability growth by failure mode removal," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 27-32.
    8. Awad, Mahmoud, 2016. "Economic allocation of reliability growth testing using Weibull distributions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 273-280.
    9. James C. Bean, 1994. "Genetic Algorithms and Random Keys for Sequencing and Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 154-160, May.
    10. Peng, Weiwen & Huang, Hong-Zhong & Li, Yanfeng & Zuo, Ming J. & Xie, Min, 2013. "Life cycle reliability assessment of new products—A Bayesian model updating approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 109-119.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peng, Yizhen & Wang, Yu & Zi, YanYang & Tsui, Kwok-Leung & Zhang, Chuhua, 2017. "Dynamic reliability assessment and prediction for repairable systems with interval-censored data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 301-309.
    2. Wang, Wei & Wu, Zhiying & Xiong, Junlin & Xu, Yaofeng, 2018. "Redundancy optimization of cold-standby systems under periodic inspection and maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 394-402.
    3. Paola Festa & Panos Pardalos, 2012. "Efficient solutions for the far from most string problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 663-682, July.
    4. Ayşegül Altın & Bernard Fortz & Mikkel Thorup & Hakan Ümit, 2013. "Intra-domain traffic engineering with shortest path routing protocols," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 204(1), pages 65-95, April.
    5. Majumdar, J. & Bhunia, A.K., 2007. "Elitist genetic algorithm for assignment problem with imprecise goal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 684-692, March.
    6. Fowler, John W. & Mönch, Lars, 2022. "A survey of scheduling with parallel batch (p-batch) processing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 1-24.
    7. Schirmer, Andreas & Riesenberg, Sven, 1997. "Parameterized heuristics for project scheduling: Biased random sampling methods," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 456, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    8. Qingzheng Xu & Na Wang & Lei Wang & Wei Li & Qian Sun, 2021. "Multi-Task Optimization and Multi-Task Evolutionary Computation in the Past Five Years: A Brief Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-44, April.
    9. Xiao, Lei & Zhang, Xinghui & Tang, Junxuan & Zhou, Yaqin, 2020. "Joint optimization of opportunistic maintenance and production scheduling considering batch production mode and varying operational conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    10. Subhendu Ruidas & Mijanur Rahaman Seikh & Prasun Kumar Nayak, 2020. "An EPQ model with stock and selling price dependent demand and variable production rate in interval environment," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(2), pages 385-399, April.
    11. Andrade, Carlos E. & Toso, Rodrigo F. & Gonçalves, José F. & Resende, Mauricio G.C., 2021. "The Multi-Parent Biased Random-Key Genetic Algorithm with Implicit Path-Relinking and its real-world applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(1), pages 17-30.
    12. J Renaud & F F Boctor & G Laporte, 2004. "Efficient heuristics for Median Cycle Problems," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(2), pages 179-186, February.
    13. Dalila B. M. M. Fontes & S. Mahdi Homayouni, 2023. "A bi-objective multi-population biased random key genetic algorithm for joint scheduling quay cranes and speed adjustable vehicles in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 241-268, March.
    14. Jun Pei & Bayi Cheng & Xinbao Liu & Panos M. Pardalos & Min Kong, 2019. "Single-machine and parallel-machine serial-batching scheduling problems with position-based learning effect and linear setup time," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 272(1), pages 217-241, January.
    15. Zhou, Feng & Huang, Gordon H. & Chen, Guo-Xian & Guo, Huai-Cheng, 2009. "Enhanced-interval linear programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(2), pages 323-333, December.
    16. Zong-Zhi Lin & James C. Bean & Chelsea C. White, 2004. "A Hybrid Genetic/Optimization Algorithm for Finite-Horizon, Partially Observed Markov Decision Processes," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 27-38, February.
    17. Christos Koulamas, 1997. "Decomposition and hybrid simulated annealing heuristics for the parallel‐machine total tardiness problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(1), pages 109-125, February.
    18. Xu, Zeshui & Chen, Jian, 2008. "Some models for deriving the priority weights from interval fuzzy preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(1), pages 266-280, January.
    19. Awad, Mahmoud, 2016. "Economic allocation of reliability growth testing using Weibull distributions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 273-280.
    20. Yanling Chang & Alan Erera & Chelsea White, 2015. "A leader–follower partially observed, multiobjective Markov game," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 235(1), pages 103-128, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:233:y:2019:i:5:p:791-802. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.