IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jclass/v6y1989i1p105-119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An evaluation of five algorithms for generating an initial configuration for SINDSCAL

Author

Listed:
  • J. Carroll
  • Geert Soete
  • Sandra Pruzansky

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Carroll & Geert Soete & Sandra Pruzansky, 1989. "An evaluation of five algorithms for generating an initial configuration for SINDSCAL," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 6(1), pages 105-119, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jclass:v:6:y:1989:i:1:p:105-119
    DOI: 10.1007/BF01908591
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF01908591
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF01908591?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yoshio Takane & Forrest Young & Jan Leeuw, 1977. "Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 42(1), pages 7-67, March.
    2. J. Douglas Carroll & Sandra Pruzansky & Joseph Kruskal, 1980. "Candelinc: A general approach to multidimensional analysis of many-way arrays with linear constraints on parameters," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 45(1), pages 3-24, March.
    3. J. Ramsay, 1977. "Maximum likelihood estimation in multidimensional scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 42(2), pages 241-266, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yoshio Takane & Kwanghee Jung & Heungsun Hwang, 2010. "An acceleration method for Ten Berge et al.’s algorithm for orthogonal INDSCAL," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 409-428, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J. Carroll, 1985. "Review," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(1), pages 133-140, March.
    2. J. Ramsey, 1986. "A PROC MATRIX program for preference-dissimilarity multidimensional scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 51(1), pages 163-170, March.
    3. Duncan Fong & Wayne DeSarbo & Zhe Chen & Zhuying Xu, 2015. "A Bayesian Vector Multidimensional Scaling Procedure Incorporating Dimension Reparameterization with Variable Selection," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(4), pages 1043-1065, December.
    4. Kohn, Hans-Friedrich, 2006. "Combinatorial individual differences scaling within the city-block metric," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 931-946, November.
    5. Constantino Arce & J. Ramsay, 1991. "Reviews," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 351-358, June.
    6. Adri Smaling & Geert Soete, 1992. "Reviews," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 451-457, September.
    7. Groenen, P.J.F. & Borg, I., 2013. "The Past, Present, and Future of Multidimensional Scaling," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2013-07, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    8. Douglas Clarkson & Richard Gonzalez, 2001. "Random effects diagonal metric multidimensional scaling models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 25-43, March.
    9. Keith Poole, 1990. "Least squares metric, unidimensional scaling of multivariate linear models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 123-149, March.
    10. Wayne DeSarbo & Michael Johnson & Ajay Manrai & Lalita Manrai & Elizabeth Edwards, 1992. "Tscale: A new multidimensional scaling procedure based on tversky's contrast model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 57(1), pages 43-69, March.
    11. Mariela González-Narváez & María José Fernández-Gómez & Susana Mendes & José-Luis Molina & Omar Ruiz-Barzola & Purificación Galindo-Villardón, 2021. "Study of Temporal Variations in Species–Environment Association through an Innovative Multivariate Method: MixSTATICO," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, May.
    12. DeSarbo, Wayne S. & Selin Atalay, A. & Blanchard, Simon J., 2009. "A three-way clusterwise multidimensional unfolding procedure for the spatial representation of context dependent preferences," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 3217-3230, June.
    13. M B Greeny, 1981. "Regional Preferences for Interlocking Directorates among the Largest American Corporations," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 13(7), pages 829-839, July.
    14. Forrest Young & Yoshio Takane & Rostyslaw Lewyckyj, 1978. "Three notes on ALSCAL," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 43(3), pages 433-435, September.
    15. Pietro Lovaglio & Mario Mezzanzanica, 2013. "Classification of longitudinal career paths," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 989-1008, February.
    16. Geert Soete & Willem Heiser, 1993. "A latent class unfolding model for analyzing single stimulus preference ratings," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(4), pages 545-565, December.
    17. Simon Blanchard & Wayne DeSarbo, 2013. "A New Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial Methodology for Latent Category Identification," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(2), pages 322-340, April.
    18. de Leeuw, Jan & Mair, Patrick, 2009. "Multidimensional Scaling Using Majorization: SMACOF in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 31(i03).
    19. Wayne DeSarbo & Kamel Jedidi & Joel Steckel, 1991. "A stochastic multidimensional scaling procedure for the empirical determination of convex indifference curves for preference/choice analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 279-307, June.
    20. S. Winsberg & J. Ramsay, 1983. "Monotone spline transformations for dimension reduction," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 48(4), pages 575-595, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jclass:v:6:y:1989:i:1:p:105-119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.