IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jclass/v10y1993i2p195-218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A latent class vector model for preference ratings

Author

Listed:
  • Geert Soete
  • Suzanne Winsberg

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Geert Soete & Suzanne Winsberg, 1993. "A latent class vector model for preference ratings," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 10(2), pages 195-218, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jclass:v:10:y:1993:i:2:p:195-218
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02626091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02626091
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02626091?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yoshio Takane & Tadashi Shibayama, 1991. "Principal component analysis with external information on both subjects and variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(1), pages 97-120, March.
    2. Geert Soete & Suzanne Winsberg, 1993. "A thurstonian pairwise choice model with univariate and multivariate spline transformations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(2), pages 233-256, June.
    3. J. Douglas Carroll & Sandra Pruzansky & Joseph Kruskal, 1980. "Candelinc: A general approach to multidimensional analysis of many-way arrays with linear constraints on parameters," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 45(1), pages 3-24, March.
    4. Richard Johnson, 1966. "The minimal transformation to orthonormality," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 31(1), pages 61-66, March.
    5. W. Gibson, 1959. "Three multivariate models: Factor analysis, latent structure analysis, and latent profile analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 24(3), pages 229-252, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. DeSarbo, Wayne S. & Selin Atalay, A. & Blanchard, Simon J., 2009. "A three-way clusterwise multidimensional unfolding procedure for the spatial representation of context dependent preferences," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 3217-3230, June.
    2. J. Vera & Rodrigo Macías & Willem Heiser, 2013. "Cluster Differences Unfolding for Two-Way Two-Mode Preference Rating Data," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 30(3), pages 370-396, October.
    3. Rick L. Andrews & Ajay K. Manrai, 1999. "MDS Maps for Product Attributes and Market Response: An Application to Scanner Panel Data," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 584-604.
    4. Tomoya Okubo & Shin-ichi Mayekawa, 2015. "Modeling Viewpoint Shifts in Probabilistic Choice," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(2), pages 412-427, June.
    5. Geert Soete & Willem Heiser, 1993. "A latent class unfolding model for analyzing single stimulus preference ratings," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(4), pages 545-565, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Geert Soete & Willem Heiser, 1993. "A latent class unfolding model for analyzing single stimulus preference ratings," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(4), pages 545-565, December.
    2. Takane, Yoshio & Jung, Kwanghee & Hwang, Heungsun, 2011. "Regularized reduced rank growth curve models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 1041-1052, February.
    3. Yoshio Takane & Haruo Yanai & Shinichi Mayekawa, 1991. "Relationships among several methods of linearly constrained correspondence analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(4), pages 667-684, December.
    4. Yoshio Takane & Henk Kiers & Jan Leeuw, 1995. "Component analysis with different sets of constraints on different dimensions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 60(2), pages 259-280, June.
    5. Henk Kiers & Yoshio Takane, 1993. "Constrained DEDICOM," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(2), pages 339-355, June.
    6. Mariela González-Narváez & María José Fernández-Gómez & Susana Mendes & José-Luis Molina & Omar Ruiz-Barzola & Purificación Galindo-Villardón, 2021. "Study of Temporal Variations in Species–Environment Association through an Innovative Multivariate Method: MixSTATICO," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, May.
    7. Eric Beh & Luigi D’Ambra, 2009. "Some Interpretative Tools for Non-Symmetrical Correspondence Analysis," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 26(1), pages 55-76, April.
    8. Takane, Yoshio & Yanai, Haruo & Hwang, Heungsun, 2006. "An improved method for generalized constrained canonical correlation analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 221-241, January.
    9. Enrico Ciavolino & Maurizio Carpita & Mariangela Nitti, 2015. "High-order PLS path model with qualitative external information," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1609-1620, July.
    10. Pietro Amenta & Antonio Lucadamo & Antonello D’Ambra, 2021. "Restricted Common Component and Specific Weight Analysis: A Constrained Explorative Approach for the Customer Satisfaction Evaluation," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 409-427, August.
    11. Takane, Yoshio & Hwang, Heungsun, 2005. "An extended redundancy analysis and its applications to two practical examples," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 785-808, June.
    12. Douglas Clarkson & Richard Gonzalez, 2001. "Random effects diagonal metric multidimensional scaling models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 25-43, March.
    13. DeSarbo, Wayne S. & Selin Atalay, A. & Blanchard, Simon J., 2009. "A three-way clusterwise multidimensional unfolding procedure for the spatial representation of context dependent preferences," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 3217-3230, June.
    14. J. Douglas Carroll & Sandra Pruzansky & Joseph Kruskal, 1980. "Candelinc: A general approach to multidimensional analysis of many-way arrays with linear constraints on parameters," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 45(1), pages 3-24, March.
    15. Keith Poole, 1990. "Least squares metric, unidimensional scaling of multivariate linear models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 123-149, March.
    16. Yoshio Takane, 1995. "Reviews," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 60(3), pages 447-448, September.
    17. Wayne DeSarbo & Kamel Jedidi & Joel Steckel, 1991. "A stochastic multidimensional scaling procedure for the empirical determination of convex indifference curves for preference/choice analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 279-307, June.
    18. Heungsun Hwang & Yoshio Takane, 2002. "Generalized constrained multiple correspondence analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 67(2), pages 211-224, June.
    19. Zilanawala, Afshin & Sacker, Amanda & Kelly, Yvonne, 2019. "Internalising and externalising behaviour profiles across childhood: The consequences of changes in the family environment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 207-216.
    20. Kohei Adachi, 2009. "Joint Procrustes Analysis for Simultaneous Nonsingular Transformation of Component Score and Loading Matrices," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 74(4), pages 667-683, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jclass:v:10:y:1993:i:2:p:195-218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.