IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/intemj/v21y2025i1d10.1007_s11365-024-01031-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploration of the social selling of family-owned B2B enterprises and perceptual barriers

Author

Listed:
  • Chengbin Wang

    (Taizhou University)

  • Yi Zhu

    (Zhejiang Qingke Bodong Medical Technology Co., Ltd.)

  • Qingyang Wang

    (Taizhou Vocational College of Science and Technology)

Abstract

In the digital age, social media provides new channels to reach customers, social selling is subverting the traditional sales model of corporate, and the practice and research of B2B social selling is still in its infancy. Based on the business experiment of social selling of family owned B2B enterprises, this paper adopts the qualitative comparative research method to verify the effectiveness of the “expert shaping + trust building” social selling model, and analyzes the perceptual barriers and their impact. The research founds: (1) The B2B “expert shaping + trust building” social selling model is self-consistent and can be interpreted by the logical paradigm of “expert shaping = expert positioning + social media + content creation” and “trust building = media collaboration + social integration + data intelligence”. (2) Perceptual barriers affect social selling of family owned B2B enterprises through perceived usefulness and ease of use, causing a gap between cognition and action. Based on the logical paradigm of social selling, this paper integrates user engagement theory, the prestage of customer insight and product iteration, optimizes the B2B social selling model, and enriches B2B social selling literature for family businesses. This paper provides practical methodology for family businesse to adopt social selling, ssuggesting that family owned B2B enterprises need to achieve consensus among key family members and company executives, and enhance their strategic cognition, business insight, team execution and organizational learning capabilities to promote social selling.

Suggested Citation

  • Chengbin Wang & Yi Zhu & Qingyang Wang, 2025. "Exploration of the social selling of family-owned B2B enterprises and perceptual barriers," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-23, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:intemj:v:21:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11365-024-01031-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11365-024-01031-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11365-024-01031-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11365-024-01031-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernhard Fabian Bichler & Andreas Kallmuenzer & Mike Peters & Tanja Petry & Thomas Clauss, 2022. "Regional entrepreneurial ecosystems: how family firm embeddedness triggers ecosystem development," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 15-44, January.
    2. Ajay Agrawal & Joshua S. Gans & Scott Stern, 2021. "Enabling Entrepreneurial Choice," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5510-5524, September.
    3. Laurianne Schmitt & Eric Casenave & Jessie Pallud, 2021. "Salespeople's work toward the institutionalization of social selling practices," Post-Print hal-03868903, HAL.
    4. Liu, Zhenyuan & Han, Shuihua & Li, Chao & Gupta, Shivam & Sivarajah, Uthayasankar, 2022. "Leveraging customer engagement to improve the operational efficiency of social commerce start-ups," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 572-582.
    5. Cherchem, Naïma, 2017. "The relationship between organizational culture and entrepreneurial orientation in family firms: Does generational involvement matter?," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 87-98.
    6. Kaplan, Andreas M. & Haenlein, Michael, 2010. "Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 59-68, January.
    7. Linda D. Hollebeek & Rajendra K. Srivastava & Tom Chen, 2019. "Correction to: S-D logic–informed customer engagement: integrative framework, revised fundamental propositions, and application to CRM," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 186-186, January.
    8. Stephen L. Vargo & Robert F. Lusch, 2016. "Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 5-23, January.
    9. Pekkala, Kaisa & van Zoonen, Ward, 2022. "Work-related social media use: The mediating role of social media communication self-efficacy," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 67-76.
    10. Linda D. Hollebeek & Rajendra K. Srivastava & Tom Chen, 2019. "S-D logic–informed customer engagement: integrative framework, revised fundamental propositions, and application to CRM," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 161-185, January.
    11. Kietzmann, Jan H. & Hermkens, Kristopher & McCarthy, Ian P. & Silvestre, Bruno S., 2011. "Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 241-251, May.
    12. Peltier, James W. & Dahl, Andrew J. & Swan, Eric L., 2020. "Digital information flows across a B2C/C2C continuum and technological innovations in service ecosystems: A service-dominant logic perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 724-734.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yao Wu & Satish Nambisan & Jinghua Xiao & Kang Xie, 2022. "Consumer resource integration and service innovation in social commerce: the role of social media influencers," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 429-459, May.
    2. Qinhai Ma & Mengyi Li & Guanghui Shi & Tianshu Zhou, 2023. "The promotional effect of interpersonal attraction of service employees on customer engagement in the S-D logic," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(11), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Ramadan, Zahy B., 2021. "“Alexafying†shoppers: The examination of Amazon's captive relationship strategy," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    4. Fletcher-Brown, Judith & Turnbull, Sarah & Viglia, Giampaolo & Chen, Tom & Pereira, Vijay, 2021. "Vulnerable consumer engagement: How corporate social media can facilitate the replenishment of depleted resources," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 518-529.
    5. XinMei Ye & Hira Batool & Shi-Zheng Huang, 2023. "The effect of e-commerce livestreaming services on customer loyalty: a test of the chain mediation model," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    6. T. Ndhlovu & T. Maree, 2024. "The central role of consumer–brand engagement in product and service brand contexts," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(4), pages 944-961, December.
    7. Kamboj, Shampy & Sarmah, Bijoylaxmi & Gupta, Shivam & Dwivedi, Yogesh, 2018. "Examining branding co-creation in brand communities on social media: Applying the paradigm of Stimulus-Organism-Response," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 169-185.
    8. Krystyna Mazurek-Lopacinska & Magdalena Sobocinska, 2021. "Social Media in Marketing Activities of Enterprises in the Light of the Analysis of Empirical Research Results," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4 - Part ), pages 647-658.
    9. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:4b:p:647-658 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Vasile-Daniel Păvăloaia & Elena-Mădălina Teodor & Doina Fotache & Magdalena Danileţ, 2019. "Opinion Mining on Social Media Data: Sentiment Analysis of User Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-21, August.
    11. Shiwei Shen & Marios Sotiriadis & Qing Zhou, 2020. "Could Smart Tourists Be Sustainable and Responsible as Well? The Contribution of Social Networking Sites to Improving Their Sustainable and Responsible Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    12. Jia, Yibo & Su, Jingqin & Cui, Li & Wu, Lin & Hua Tan, Kim, 2023. "Platform business model innovation in the digitalization era: A “driver-process-result” perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    13. Perez-Vega, Rodrigo & Hopkinson, Paul & Singhal, Aishwarya & Mariani, Marcello M., 2022. "From CRM to social CRM: A bibliometric review and research agenda for consumer research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1-16.
    14. Reilly, Anne H. & Hynan, Katherine A., 2014. "Corporate communication, sustainability, and social media: It's not easy (really) being green," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 57(6), pages 747-758.
    15. TANASE, George Cosmin, 2017. "Managing the Brand and Communication in Social Media," Romanian Distribution Committee Magazine, Romanian Distribution Committee, vol. 8(2), pages 20-22, June.
    16. Saridakis, George & Benson, Vladlena & Ezingeard, Jean-Noel & Tennakoon, Hemamali, 2016. "Individual information security, user behaviour and cyber victimisation: An empirical study of social networking users," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 320-330.
    17. Wilert Puriwat & Suchart Tripopsakul, 2021. "Explaining Social Media Adoption for a Business Purpose: An Application of the UTAUT Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, February.
    18. Nathalie Peña-García & Mauricio Losada-Otálora & Jorge Juliao-Rossi & Augusto Rodríguez-Orejuela, 2021. "Co-Creation of Value and Customer Experience: An Application in Online Banking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-14, September.
    19. Chen, Yan, 2018. "Blockchain tokens and the potential democratization of entrepreneurship and innovation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 567-575.
    20. Elena Casprini & Alberto Di Minin, 2015. "How are companies facing the social media (r)evolution?," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(2), pages 67-86.
    21. Baccarella, Christian V. & Wagner, Timm F. & Kietzmann, Jan H. & McCarthy, Ian P., 2018. "Social media? It's serious! Understanding the dark side of social media," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 431-438.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:intemj:v:21:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11365-024-01031-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.