IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/intemj/v18y2022i4d10.1007_s11365-020-00740-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social and strategic innovation: extending the varieties of capitalism to asian countries

Author

Listed:
  • Rosalia Diaz-Carrion

    (The University of Seville)

  • Noelia Franco-Leal

    (The University of Cadiz)

Abstract

This article empirically analyzes how institutional context affects the nature of firms´ innovation—social and/or strategic—using the varieties of capitalism paradigm extended to include Asian economies. Because formal and informal institutional pressures shape the way firms behave in terms of risk-taking and opportunity-detection, it can be expected that institutional context influences the nature of innovation. An empirical analysis using a sample of 603 small- and medium-sized innovative enterprises is developed to provide a comprehensive view of how the institutional context in which a company operates determines the nature of firms´ innovation. A cross-country-cluster comparison is made using analysis of variance among Asian economies, coordinated market economies, liberal market economies, and mixed market economies. The results show that the high degree of public involvement and institutional support that characterize coordinated market economies and the normative pressures that characterize Asian economies fosters firms´ involvement with social innovation. These empirical findings support the theoretical arguments that point to institutional context as an important determinant of the nature of firms´ innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosalia Diaz-Carrion & Noelia Franco-Leal, 2022. "Social and strategic innovation: extending the varieties of capitalism to asian countries," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 1453-1474, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:intemj:v:18:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s11365-020-00740-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11365-020-00740-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11365-020-00740-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11365-020-00740-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boyer, Robert, 2005. "How and Why Capitalisms Differ," MPIfG Discussion Paper 05/4, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    2. Ute Stephan & Lorraine M Uhlaner & Christopher Stride, 2015. "Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 46(3), pages 308-331, April.
    3. David Urbano & Elisabeth Ferri & Marta Peris-Ortiz & Sebastian Aparicio, 2017. "Social Entrepreneurship and Institutional Factors: A Literature Review," International Studies in Entrepreneurship, in: Marta Peris-Ortiz & Frédèric Teulon & Dominique Bonet-Fernandez (ed.), Social Entrepreneurship in Non-Profit and Profit Sectors, chapter 0, pages 9-29, Springer.
    4. Susan Christopherson, 2002. "Why Do National Labor Market Practices Continue to Diverge in the Global Economy? The “Missing Link” of Investment Rules," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 78(1), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Selin Dilli & Niklas Elert & Andrea M. Herrmann, 2018. "Varieties of entrepreneurship: exploring the institutional foundations of different entrepreneurship types through ‘Varieties-of-Capitalism’ arguments," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 293-320, August.
    6. Cajaiba-Santana, Giovany, 2014. "Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 42-51.
    7. Estrin, Saul & Korosteleva, Julia & Mickiewicz, Tomasz, 2013. "Which institutions encourage entrepreneurial growth aspirations?," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 564-580.
    8. David Urbano & Claudia Alvarez, 2014. "Institutional dimensions and entrepreneurial activity: an international study," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 703-716, April.
    9. Schmid, Jon & Kwon, Seokbeom, 2020. "Collaboration in innovation: An empirical test of Varieties of Capitalism," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    10. David Urbano & Nuria Toledano & Domingo Ribeiro Soriano, 2010. "Analyzing Social Entrepreneurship from an Institutional Perspective: Evidence from Spain," Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 54-69, March.
    11. Taylor, Mark Zachary, 2004. "Empirical Evidence Against Varieties of Capitalism's Theory of Technological Innovation," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 58(3), pages 601-631, July.
    12. Kunapatarawong, Rasi & Martínez-Ros, Ester, 2016. "Towards green growth: How does green innovation affect employment?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 1218-1232.
    13. Turker, Duygu & Altuntas Vural, Ceren, 2017. "Embedding social innovation process into the institutional context: Voids or supports," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 98-113.
    14. Pol, Eduardo & Ville, Simon, 2009. "Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 878-885, December.
    15. Liu, Xielin & White, Steven, 2001. "Comparing innovation systems: a framework and application to China's transitional context," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(7), pages 1091-1114, August.
    16. Robert Boyer, 2005. "How and why capitalisms differ," Post-Print halshs-00754052, HAL.
    17. Martina E. Murphy & Srinath Perera & George Heaney, 2015. "Innovation management model: a tool for sustained implementation of product innovation into construction projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 209-232, March.
    18. Robert Boyer, 2005. "How and why capitalisms differ," Post-Print hal-00812971, HAL.
    19. Jürgen Howaldt & Ralf Kopp, 2012. "Shaping Social Innovation by Social Research," Springer Books, in: Hans-Werner Franz & Josef Hochgerner & Jürgen Howaldt (ed.), Challenge Social Innovation, edition 127, pages 43-55, Springer.
    20. Gregory Jackson & Androniki Apostolakou, 2010. "Corporate Social Responsibility in Western Europe: An Institutional Mirror or Substitute?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(3), pages 371-394, July.
    21. Akkermans, Dirk & Castaldi, Carolina & Los, Bart, 2009. "Do 'liberal market economies' really innovate more radically than 'coordinated market economies'?: Hall and Soskice reconsidered," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 181-191, February.
    22. Dmitri Domanski & Jürgen Howaldt & Christoph Kaletka, 2020. "A comprehensive concept of social innovation and its implications for the local context – on the growing importance of social innovation ecosystems and infrastructures," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 454-474, March.
    23. Muralidharan, Etayankara & Pathak, Saurav, 2017. "Informal institutions and international entrepreneurship," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 288-302.
    24. Leslie Williams & Stephen McGuire, 2010. "Economic creativity and innovation implementation: the entrepreneurial drivers of growth? Evidence from 63 countries," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 391-412, May.
    25. Gabriel Eweje & Mina Sakaki, 2015. "CSR in Japanese Companies: Perspectives from Managers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(7), pages 678-687, November.
    26. Walker, James & Wood, Geoff & Brewster, Chris & Beleska-Spasova, Elena, 2018. "Context, market economies and MNEs: The example of financial incentivization," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 21-33.
    27. Marival Segarra‐Oña & Angel Peiró‐Signes & José Albors‐Garrigós & Blanca De Miguel‐Molina, 2017. "Testing the Social Innovation Construct: An Empirical Approach to Align Socially Oriented Objectives, Stakeholder Engagement, and Environmental Sustainability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1), pages 15-27, January.
    28. Maribel Guerrero & David Urbano, 2020. "Institutional conditions and social innovations in emerging economies: insights from Mexican enterprises’ initiatives for protecting/preventing the effect of violent events," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 929-957, August.
    29. Juelin Yin & Yuli Zhang, 2012. "Institutional Dynamics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in an Emerging Country Context: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(2), pages 301-316, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carmen Guzmán & Francisco J. Santos & Teresa Savall, 2024. "How to explain social innovation in elderly care services: The role of for-profit and non-profit social enterprises," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1849-1877, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Živojinović, Ivana & Rogelja, Todora & Weiss, Gerhard & Ludvig, Alice & Secco, Laura, 2023. "Institutional structures impeding forest-based social innovation in Serbia and Slovenia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    2. Nadarević, Sabine & Martin, Alexander, 2020. "A comparative study on the institutional determinants of social entrepreneurial activity: The moderating effect of capitalism," Flensburger Hefte zu Unternehmertum und Mittelstand 19, Jackstädt-Zentrum Flensburg.
    3. Reale, Filippo, 2019. "Governing innovation systems: A Parsonian social systems perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    4. Andrea M. Herrmann, 2019. "A plea for varieties of entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 331-343, February.
    5. Bendig, David & Kleine-Stegemann, Lucas & Mazur, Michael & Zapkau, Florian B., 2024. "A multi-level analysis of the relationship between formal institutions and ambitious entrepreneurship: The moderating role of economic development," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(5).
    6. Daniel Herrero & Julián López-Gallego, 2022. "Revisiting varieties of capitalism: an empirical analysis of the institutional determinants of innovation in Germany," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(8), pages 1-31, August.
    7. Petteri Repo & Kaisa Matschoss, 2019. "Social Innovation for Sustainability Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Beckert, Jens & Ebbinghaus, Bernhard & Hassel, Anke & Manow, Philip (ed.), 2006. "Transformationen des Kapitalismus: Festschrift für Wolfgang Streeck zum sechzigsten Geburtstag," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 57, number 57.
    9. David Neilson, 2021. "Beyond Regressive Nationalism and the Neoliberal Model of Development," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 53(1), pages 17-34, March.
    10. Yassine Bakkar & Susanne Durst & Wolfgang Gerstlberger, 2021. "The Impact of Institutional Dimensions on Entrepreneurial Intentions of Students—International Evidence," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-23, April.
    11. Almeida, Renan P. & Hungaro, Lucas, 2021. "Water and sanitation governance between austerity and financialization," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    12. ten Brink, Tobias, 2010. "Strukturmerkmale des chinesischen Kapitalismus," MPIfG Discussion Paper 10/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    13. Fritz, Martin & Koch, Max, 2014. "Potentials for prosperity without growth: Ecological sustainability, social inclusion and the quality of life in 38 countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 191-199.
    14. Naoise McDonagh, 2021. "Credit Guidance for a Desired Economy: An Original Institutional Economics Critique of Financialization," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 53(4), pages 675-693, December.
    15. Attila Havas & Doris Schartinger & K. Matthias Weber, 2022. "Innovation Studies, Social Innovation, and Sustainability Transitions Research: From mutual ignorance towards an integrative perspective?," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 2227, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    16. Valentino Marini Govigli & Sophie Alkhaled & Tor Arnesen & Carla Barlagne & Mari Bjerck & Catie Burlando & Mariana Melnykovych & Carmen Rodríguez Fernandez-Blanco & Patricia Sfeir & Elena Górriz-Mifsu, 2020. "Testing a Framework to Co-Construct Social Innovation Actions: Insights from Seven Marginalized Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-26, February.
    17. Céline Gainet, 2010. "Exploring the Impact of Legal Systems and Financial Structure on Corporate Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(2), pages 195-222, September.
    18. Rachael Gibson & Harald Bathelt, 2014. "Proximity relations and global knowledge flows: specialization and diffusion processes across capitalist varieties," Chapters, in: André Torre & Frédéric Wallet (ed.), Regional Development and Proximity Relations, chapter 9, pages 291-314, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Alexander Ebner, 2010. "Varieties of Capitalism and the Limits of Entrepreneurship Policy: Institutional Reform in Germany’s Coordinated Market Economy," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 319-341, September.
    20. Hugo Pinto & Carla Nogueira & J. André Guerreiro & Fábio Sampaio, 2021. "Social Innovation and the Role of the State: Learning from the Portuguese Experience on Multi-Level Interactions," World, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-19, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:intemj:v:18:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s11365-020-00740-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.