IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i4p1441-d320991.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing a Framework to Co-Construct Social Innovation Actions: Insights from Seven Marginalized Rural Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Valentino Marini Govigli

    (Mediterranean Facility (EFIMED), European Forest Institute, 08025 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Sophie Alkhaled

    (Management School, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YX, UK)

  • Tor Arnesen

    (Inland School of Business and Social Sciences, Inland Norway University of Applied Science (INN), 2609 Lillehammer, Norway)

  • Carla Barlagne

    (Social, Economic and Geographical Sciences Group, The James Hutton Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, UK)

  • Mari Bjerck

    (Inland School of Business and Social Sciences, Inland Norway University of Applied Science (INN), 2609 Lillehammer, Norway)

  • Catie Burlando

    (ETIFOR, 35020 Legnaro, Italy)

  • Mariana Melnykovych

    (Mediterranean Facility (EFIMED), European Forest Institute, 08025 Barcelona, Spain
    Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), 8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland)

  • Carmen Rodríguez Fernandez-Blanco

    (Mediterranean Facility (EFIMED), European Forest Institute, 08025 Barcelona, Spain
    Bioeconomy and Governance programme, Forest Sciences Centre of Catalonia (CTFC), 25280 Solsona, Spain
    FORECO Technologies, 25280 Solsona, Spain)

  • Patricia Sfeir

    (SEEDS-Int, Horsh Tabet, Sin El Fil, Lebanon)

  • Elena Górriz-Mifsud

    (Mediterranean Facility (EFIMED), European Forest Institute, 08025 Barcelona, Spain
    Bioeconomy and Governance programme, Forest Sciences Centre of Catalonia (CTFC), 25280 Solsona, Spain)

Abstract

Innovation actions within European Horizon 2020 (H2020) projects aim at testing research results in practice. When supporting social innovations in rural areas, such testing requires the alignment of several rural actors in order to entail behavioral changes beyond the individual level. Recently, social innovation has been recognized as an important tool for rural areas, developing new solutions to respond to wicked problems for improving local living conditions at the grassroots level. In this study, we analyzed the use of an operational framework to support the early governance of social innovation actions. This framework was applied to co-construct seven innovation actions across Europe and the Mediterranean basin applied to forestry, agriculture, and rural development. Our results showed that supporting social innovators and local actors at the early stage of social innovation processes is key for efficiently addressing and tackling challenges and opportunities. Additionally, we showed that the process of defining a social innovation is complex and requires recursive engagement, which might lead to evolution through time, especially in the first phases of the process. Lastly, conducting the feasibility assessment enabled strategic thinking on crucial dimensions for designing a promising social innovation action, such as social networks management, financial sustainability, and know-how. Such findings helped us to draw general lessons for the development and governance of social innovation actions in rural areas, potentially applicable to any rural sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentino Marini Govigli & Sophie Alkhaled & Tor Arnesen & Carla Barlagne & Mari Bjerck & Catie Burlando & Mariana Melnykovych & Carmen Rodríguez Fernandez-Blanco & Patricia Sfeir & Elena Górriz-Mifsu, 2020. "Testing a Framework to Co-Construct Social Innovation Actions: Insights from Seven Marginalized Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-26, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1441-:d:320991
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1441/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1441/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Veronika Zavratnik & Argene Superina & Emilija Stojmenova Duh, 2019. "Living Labs for Rural Areas: Contextualization of Living Lab Frameworks, Concepts and Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Norman Myers & Russell A. Mittermeier & Cristina G. Mittermeier & Gustavo A. B. da Fonseca & Jennifer Kent, 2000. "Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities," Nature, Nature, vol. 403(6772), pages 853-858, February.
    3. Ute Stephan & Lorraine M Uhlaner & Christopher Stride, 2015. "Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 46(3), pages 308-331, April.
    4. Reinhilde Veugelers & Michele Cincera & Rainer Frietsch & Torben Schubert & Christian Rammer & Anita Pelle & Andrea Renda & Carlos Montalvo & Jos Leijten, 2015. "The Impact of Horizon 2020 on Innovation in Europe," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/195949, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    5. Ludvig, Alice & Wilding, Maria & Thorogood, Adam & Weiss, Gerhard, 2018. "Social innovation in the Welsh Woodlands: Community based forestry as collective third-sector engagement," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 18-25.
    6. Coombs, Rod & Hull, Richard, 1998. "'Knowledge management practices' and path-dependency in innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 237-253, July.
    7. Ivana Živojinović & Alice Ludvig & Karl Hogl, 2019. "Social Innovation to Sustain Rural Communities: Overcoming Institutional Challenges in Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-27, December.
    8. Cajaiba-Santana, Giovany, 2014. "Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 42-51.
    9. Sarkki, Simo & Ficko, Andrej & Miller, David & Barlagne, Carla & Melnykovych, Mariana & Jokinen, Mikko & Soloviy, Ihor & Nijnik, Maria, 2019. "Human values as catalysts and consequences of social innovations," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 33-44.
    10. Pol, Eduardo & Ville, Simon, 2009. "Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 878-885, December.
    11. Camps, Susanna & Marques, Pilar, 2014. "Exploring how social capital facilitates innovation: The role of innovation enablers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 325-348.
    12. Tracy Ross & Valerie A. Mitchell & Andrew J. May, 2012. "Bottom-up grassroots innovation in transport: motivations, barriers and enablers," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 469-489, January.
    13. Wondirad, Amare & Ewnetu, Biruk, 2019. "Community participation in tourism development as a tool to foster sustainable land and resource use practices in a national park milieu," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Živojinović, Ivana & Rogelja, Todora & Weiss, Gerhard & Ludvig, Alice & Secco, Laura, 2023. "Institutional structures impeding forest-based social innovation in Serbia and Slovenia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Živojinović, Ivana & Rogelja, Todora & Weiss, Gerhard & Ludvig, Alice & Secco, Laura, 2023. "Institutional structures impeding forest-based social innovation in Serbia and Slovenia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    2. Ludvig, Alice & Sarkki, Simo & Weiss, Gerhard & Živojinović, Ivana, 2021. "Policy impacts on social innovation in forestry and back: Institutional change as a driver and outcome," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    3. Ivana Živojinović & Alice Ludvig & Karl Hogl, 2019. "Social Innovation to Sustain Rural Communities: Overcoming Institutional Challenges in Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-27, December.
    4. Carla Barlagne & Mariana Melnykovych & David Miller & Richard J. Hewitt & Laura Secco & Elena Pisani & Maria Nijnik, 2021. "What Are the Impacts of Social Innovation? A Synthetic Review and Case Study of Community Forestry in the Scottish Highlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, April.
    5. Ludvig, Alice & Weiss, Gerhard & Sarkki, Simo & Nijnik, Maria & Živojinović, Ivana, 2018. "Mapping European and forest related policies supporting social innovation for rural settings," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 146-152.
    6. Rosalia Diaz-Carrion & Noelia Franco-Leal, 2022. "Social and strategic innovation: extending the varieties of capitalism to asian countries," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 1453-1474, December.
    7. Elisa Ravazzoli & Cristina Dalla Torre & Riccardo Da Re & Valentino Marini Govigli & Laura Secco & Elena Górriz-Mifsud & Elena Pisani & Carla Barlagne & Antonio Baselice & Mohammed Bengoumi & Marijke , 2021. "Can Social Innovation Make a Change in European and Mediterranean Marginalized Areas? Social Innovation Impact Assessment in Agriculture, Fisheries, Forestry, and Rural Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-27, February.
    8. de Souza João-Roland, Iraci & Granados, Maria L., 2023. "Towards social innovation strategy: An analysis of UK social enterprises," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    9. Petteri Repo & Kaisa Matschoss, 2019. "Social Innovation for Sustainability Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Baran Grzegorz, 2020. "Social Innovation Living Labs as Platforms to Co-design Social Innovations," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 36-57, March.
    11. Cristina Dalla Torre & Elisa Ravazzoli & Marijke Dijkshoorn-Dekker & Nico Polman & Mariana Melnykovych & Elena Pisani & Francesca Gori & Riccardo Da Re & Kamini Vicentini & Laura Secco, 2020. "The Role of Agency in the Emergence and Development of Social Innovations in Rural Areas. Analysis of Two Cases of Social Farming in Italy and The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-25, May.
    12. Tachia Chin & Yin Yang & Pei Zhang & Xiaofen Yu & Luying Cao, 2019. "Co-creation of Social Innovation: Corporate Universities as Innovative Strategies for Chinese Firms to Engage with Society," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-13, March.
    13. Attila Havas & Doris Schartinger & K. Matthias Weber, 2022. "Innovation Studies, Social Innovation, and Sustainability Transitions Research: From mutual ignorance towards an integrative perspective?," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 2227, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    14. Tan, Wee-Liang & Zuckermann, Ghil'ad, 2021. "External impetus, co-production and grassroots innovations: The case of an innovation involving a language," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    15. Weiss, Gerhard & Hansen, Eric & Ludvig, Alice & Nybakk, Erlend & Toppinen, Anne, 2021. "Innovation governance in the forest sector: Reviewing concepts, trends and gaps," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    16. Simo Sarkki & Cristina Dalla Torre & Jasmiini Fransala & Ivana Živojinović & Alice Ludvig & Elena Górriz-Mifsud & Mariana Melnykovych & Patricia R. Sfeir & Labidi Arbia & Mohammed Bengoumi & Houda Cho, 2021. "Reconstructive Social Innovation Cycles in Women-Led Initiatives in Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, January.
    17. Susanna Ulinski, 2015. "Corporate Social Innovation as a Driver of Performance and Welfare. WWWforEurope Policy Paper No. 25," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58500.
    18. van der Have, Robert P. & Rubalcaba, Luis, 2016. "Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1923-1935.
    19. Hugo Pinto & Carla Nogueira & J. André Guerreiro & Fábio Sampaio, 2021. "Social Innovation and the Role of the State: Learning from the Portuguese Experience on Multi-Level Interactions," World, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-19, January.
    20. Chiara Cannavale & Lorenza Claudio & Michele Simoni, 2021. "How social innovations spread globally through the process of reverse innovation: a case-study from the South Korea," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2021(4), pages 421-440, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1441-:d:320991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.