IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infsem/v20y2022i1d10.1007_s10257-021-00543-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating value modeling and legal risk management: an IT case study

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Muthuri

    (Anjarwalla & Khanna LLP - ALN House)

  • Sara Capecchi

    (University of Turin)

  • Emilio Sulis

    (University of Turin)

  • Ilaria Angela Amantea

    (University of Turin)

  • Guido Boella

    (University of Turin)

Abstract

Companies need to be able to demonstrate compliance with rules and regulations, especially start-ups who typically do not have the legal expertise to identify, assess and address legal risks of initial business ideas, nor do they have the resources to hire such expertise. Tools could help them identify and deal with legal risk at an early stage. Existing research in BPM focuses on compliance verification of a consolidated business model by checking the ability of a company to comply with the standards. The challenge is to apply a ‘continuous improvement’ by steering the business on values. Moreover, legal choices typically sit at the strategic level, and not only at the operational level. In this paper, we therefore propose an approach to handle legal risks as part of business model development. The approach makes use of Continuous Business Model Planning method, a value-driven modeling approach for strategic planning, and legal argumentation. The suitability and potential usefulness of the approach is illustrated by a study of the Kenyan court case Lipisha & BitPesa vs. Safaricom.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Muthuri & Sara Capecchi & Emilio Sulis & Ilaria Angela Amantea & Guido Boella, 2022. "Integrating value modeling and legal risk management: an IT case study," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 27-55, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:20:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10257-021-00543-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10257-021-00543-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10257-021-00543-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10257-021-00543-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mustafa Hashmi & Guido Governatori & Moe Thandar Wynn, 2016. "Normative requirements for regulatory compliance: An abstract formal framework," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 429-455, June.
    2. Vera Kartseva & Joris Hulstijn & Jaap Gordijn & Yao-Hua Tan, 2010. "Control patterns in a health-care network," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 320-343, June.
    3. Ben Roelens & Geert Poels, 2015. "The Development and Experimental Evaluation of a Focused Business Model Representation," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 57(1), pages 61-71, February.
    4. Michael Naylor, 2017. "The Impact of Disruptive Technology," Palgrave Studies in Financial Services Technology, in: Insurance Transformed, chapter 0, pages 47-92, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. James Mohun & Alex Roberts, 2020. "Cracking the code: Rulemaking for humans and machines," OECD Working Papers on Public Governance 42, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Parycek & Verena Schmid & Anna-Sophie Novak, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Automation in Administrative Procedures: Potentials, Limitations, and Framework Conditions," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 8390-8415, June.
    2. Haluk Demirkan & James C. Spohrer, 2016. "Emerging service orientations and transformations (SOT)," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 407-411, June.
    3. Pompeu Casanovas & Louis de Koker & Mustafa Hashmi, 2022. "Law, Socio-Legal Governance, the Internet of Things, and Industry 4.0: A Middle-Out/Inside-Out Approach," J, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-28, January.
    4. Mustafa Hashmi, 2022. "On Modelling Process Aspects With Deontic Event-Calculus," International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology (IJSSMET), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Lucian Cernat, 2021. "Trade policy 2.0 and algorithms: towards the "easification" of FTA implementation," CIRANO Papers 2021pe-05, CIRANO.
    6. Benedikt Simmert & Philipp Alexander Ebel & Christoph Peters & Eva Alice Christiane Bittner & Jan Marco Leimeister, 2019. "Conquering the Challenge of Continuous Business Model Improvement," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(4), pages 451-468, August.
    7. Oktay Turetken & Paul Grefen & Rick Gilsing & O. Ege Adali, 2019. "Service-Dominant Business Model Design for Digital Innovation in Smart Mobility," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(1), pages 9-29, February.
    8. Pedro Antunes & Jose A. Pino & Mary Tate & Alistair Barros, 0. "Eliciting Process Knowledge Through Process Stories," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    9. Pedro Antunes & Jose A. Pino & Mary Tate & Alistair Barros, 2020. "Eliciting Process Knowledge Through Process Stories," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 1179-1201, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:20:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10257-021-00543-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.