IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infsem/v18y2020i2d10.1007_s10257-020-00472-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Shadow IT to Business-managed IT: a qualitative comparative analysis to determine configurations for successful management of IT by business entities

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Kopper

    (TU Dresden)

  • Markus Westner

    (OTH Regensburg)

  • Susanne Strahringer

    (TU Dresden)

Abstract

Shadow IT describes covert/hidden IT systems that are managed by business entities themselves. Additionally, there are also overt forms in practice, so-called Business-managed IT, which share most of the characteristics of Shadow IT. To better understand this phenomenon, we interviewed 29 executive IT managers about positive and negative cases of Shadow IT and Business-managed IT. By applying qualitative comparative analysis (QCA), we derived four conditions that characterize these cases: Aligned, local, simple, and volatile. The results show that there are three sufficient configurations of conditions that lead to a positive outcome; one of them even encompasses Shadow IT. The most important solution indicates that IT systems managed by business entities are viewed as being positive if they are aligned with the IT department and limited to local requirements. This allows to balance local responsiveness to changing requirements and global standardization. In contrast, IT systems that are not aligned and permanent (and either organization-wide or simple) are consistently considered as negative. Our study is the first empirical quantitative–qualitative study to shed light on the success and failure of Shadow IT and Business-managed IT.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Kopper & Markus Westner & Susanne Strahringer, 2020. "From Shadow IT to Business-managed IT: a qualitative comparative analysis to determine configurations for successful management of IT by business entities," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 209-257, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:18:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10257-020-00472-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10257-020-00472-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10257-020-00472-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10257-020-00472-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Youngjin Yoo & Richard J. Boland & Kalle Lyytinen & Ann Majchrzak, 2012. "Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 1398-1408, October.
    2. Amrit Tiwana & Benn Konsynski, 2010. "Complementarities Between Organizational IT Architecture and Governance Structure," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 288-304, June.
    3. Sebastian Köffer & Kevin Ortbach & Iris Junglas & Björn Niehaves & Jeanne Harris, 2015. "Innovation Through BYOD?," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 57(6), pages 363-375, December.
    4. Schneider, Martin R. & Eggert, Andreas, 2014. "Embracing complex causality with the QCA method: An invitation," jbm - Journal of Business Market Management, Free University Berlin, Marketing Department, vol. 7(1), pages 312-328.
    5. Nils Urbach & Frederik Ahlemann, 2016. "IT-Management im Zeitalter der Digitalisierung," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-662-52832-7, January.
    6. Dul, J., 2015. "Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA)," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2015-004-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    7. Haag, Steffi, 2015. "Appearance of Dark Clouds? - An Empirical Analysis of Users' Shadow Sourcing of Cloud Services," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 82695, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    8. Wagemann, Claudius & Buche, Jonas & Siewert, Markus B., 2016. "QCA and business research: Work in progress or a consolidated agenda?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 2531-2540.
    9. Omar A. El Sawy & Arvind Malhotra & YoungKi Park & Paul A. Pavlou, 2010. "Research Commentary ---Seeking the Configurations of Digital Ecodynamics: It Takes Three to Tango," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 835-848, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreas Kopper & Markus Westner & Susanne Strahringer, 0. "From Shadow IT to Business-managed IT: a qualitative comparative analysis to determine configurations for successful management of IT by business entities," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-49.
    2. David Soto Setzke & Tobias Riasanow & Markus Böhm & Helmut Krcmar, 2023. "Pathways to Digital Service Innovation: The Role of Digital Transformation Strategies in Established Organizations," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1017-1037, June.
    3. Swen Nadkarni & Reinhard Prügl, 2021. "Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 233-341, April.
    4. Deon Montasser & Ruslan Prijadi & Tengku Ezni Balqiah, 2023. "The Mediating Effect of IT-Enabled Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Readiness on the Relationship Between Transformational Leadership and Digital Business Model Innovation: Evidence From Indone," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    5. Thorsten Koch & Josef Windsperger, 2017. "Seeing through the network: Competitive advantage in the digital economy," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 6(1), pages 1-30, December.
    6. Anna Salonen & Harri Terho & Eva Böhm & Ari Virtanen & Risto Rajala, 2021. "Engaging a product-focused sales force in solution selling: interplay of individual- and organizational-level conditions," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 139-163, January.
    7. Sascha Kraus & Domingo Ribeiro-Soriano & Miriam Schüssler, 2018. "Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research – the rise of a method," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 15-33, March.
    8. Antonopoulou, Katerina & Begkos, Christos, 2020. "Strategizing for digital innovations: Value propositions for transcending market boundaries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    9. Daniel A. Skog & Henrik Wimelius & Johan Sandberg, 2018. "Digital Disruption," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 60(5), pages 431-437, October.
    10. Steffi Haag & Andreas Eckhardt, 2017. "Shadow IT," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 59(6), pages 469-473, December.
    11. Teubner, Alexander & Stockhinger, Jan, 2020. "IT/IS strategy research and digitalization: An extensive literature review," ERCIS Working Papers 34, University of Münster, European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS).
    12. Brenes, Esteban R. & Ciravegna, Luciano & Acuña, Joseph, 2020. "Differentiation strategies in agribusiness – A configurational approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 522-539.
    13. Fabian Schueler & Dimitri Petrik, 2022. "Objectives of platform research: A co-citation and systematic literature review analysis," Papers 2202.08822, arXiv.org.
    14. Jan Jöhnk & Philipp Ollig & Patrick Rövekamp & Severin Oesterle, 2022. "Managing the complexity of digital transformation—How multiple concurrent initiatives foster hybrid ambidexterity," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 547-569, June.
    15. Akhmedova, Anna & Marimon, Frederic & Mas-Machuca, Marta, 2020. "Winning strategies for customer loyalty in the sharing economy: A mixed-methods study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 33-44.
    16. Opland, Leif Erik & Pappas, Ilias O. & Engesmo, Jostein & Jaccheri, Letizia, 2022. "Employee-driven digital innovation: A systematic review and a research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 255-271.
    17. YoungKi Park & Paul A. Pavlou & Nilesh Saraf, 2020. "Configurations for Achieving Organizational Ambidexterity with Digitization," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 1376-1397, December.
    18. Schlittgen, Rainer & Ringle, Christian M. & Sarstedt, Marko & Becker, Jan-Michael, 2016. "Segmentation of PLS path models by iterative reweighted regressions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4583-4592.
    19. André Hanelt & René Bohnsack & David Marz & Cláudia Antunes Marante, 2021. "A Systematic Review of the Literature on Digital Transformation: Insights and Implications for Strategy and Organizational Change," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(5), pages 1159-1197, July.
    20. Caroline Jennings Saul & Heiko Gebauer, 2018. "Digital Transformation as an Enabler for Advanced Services in the Sanitation Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:18:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10257-020-00472-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.