IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infott/v23y2021i2d10.1007_s40558-021-00200-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benefit segmentation in the tourist accommodation market based on eWOM attribute ratings

Author

Listed:
  • Karolina Nessel

    (Jagiellonian University in Kraków)

  • Szczepan Kościółek

    (Jagiellonian University in Kraków)

  • Ewa Wszendybył-Skulska

    (Jagiellonian University in Kraków)

  • Sebastian Kopera

    (Jagiellonian University in Kraków)

Abstract

Given the increasing importance of electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in the global tourism market, the purpose of the study was to estimate weights customers assign to main attributes of tourist accommodations embodied in easily observed eWOM numerical ratings and subsequently to determine segments of customers with homogenous preferences. To this goal, the preferences tourists attach to price and seven other accommodation attributes rated by Internet users on Booking.com were revealed with the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Next, a two-stage clustering procedure based on these preferences was undertaken followed by profiling of the clusters in terms of their socio-demographics and travel characteristics. The results show that even if the ranking of the attributes is roughly the same for all the segments (with cleanliness, value for money, and location always in top four), all eight attributes effectively segment tourists into three clusters: “quality-seekers” (45% of the market), “bargain-seekers” (35%), and “cleanliness-seekers” (20%). The segments differ in terms of tourists’ income and expenditures, type of accommodation, actual payer for accommodation, and trip purpose. In contrast, socio-demographics, and most tourists stay variables are alike across the segments. The proposed method of benefit segmentation provides a new perspective for an exploitation of eWOM data by accommodation providers in their marketing strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Karolina Nessel & Szczepan Kościółek & Ewa Wszendybył-Skulska & Sebastian Kopera, 2021. "Benefit segmentation in the tourist accommodation market based on eWOM attribute ratings," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 265-290, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:infott:v:23:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s40558-021-00200-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s40558-021-00200-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40558-021-00200-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40558-021-00200-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. King, Robert Allen & Racherla, Pradeep & Bush, Victoria D., 2014. "What We Know and Don't Know About Online Word-of-Mouth: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 167-183.
    2. Keeney,Ralph L. & Raiffa,Howard, 1993. "Decisions with Multiple Objectives," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521438834, October.
    3. Kim, Dohee & Park, Byung-Jin (Robert), 2017. "The moderating role of context in the effects of choice attributes on hotel choice: A discrete choice experiment," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 439-451.
    4. Simon, Herbert A, 1979. "Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 69(4), pages 493-513, September.
    5. Mustafeed Zaman & Laurent Botti & Tan Vo Thanh, 2016. "Weight of criteria in hotel selection: An empirical illustration based on TripAdvisor criteria," Post-Print hal-02397964, HAL.
    6. Paker, Neslihan & Vural, Ceren Altuntaş, 2016. "Customer segmentation for marinas: Evaluating marinas as destinations," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 156-171.
    7. Song, Haiyan & Lin, Shanshan & Witt, Stephen F. & Zhang, Xinyan, 2011. "Impact of financial/economic crisis on demand for hotel rooms in Hong Kong," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 172-186.
    8. Albayrak, Tahir & Caber, Meltem, 2015. "Prioritisation of the hotel attributes according to their influence on satisfaction: A comparison of two techniques," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 43-50.
    9. Sparks, Beverley A. & Browning, Victoria, 2011. "The impact of online reviews on hotel booking intentions and perception of trust," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1310-1323.
    10. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    11. Mustafeed Zaman & Laurent Botti & Tan Vo-Thanh, 2016. "Weight of criteria in hotel selection: An empirical illustration based on TripAdvisor criteria," Post-Print hal-03406974, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arpan Kumar Kar & Sunil Kumar & P. Vigneswara Ilavarasan, 2021. "Modelling the Service Experience Encounters Using User-Generated Content: A Text Mining Approach," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(4), pages 267-288, December.
    2. Driss El Kadiri Boutchich, 2024. "Tourism performance evaluation and analysis from composite index and slack based method," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 61(2), pages 501-523, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sparks, Beverley A. & So, Kevin Kam Fung & Bradley, Graham L., 2016. "Responding to negative online reviews: The effects of hotel responses on customer inferences of trust and concern," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 74-85.
    2. Yuanyuan Guo & Yanqing Wang & Chaoyou Wang, 2019. "Exploring the Salient Attributes of Short-Term Rental Experience: An Analysis of Online Reviews from Chinese Guests," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Azer, Jaylan & Ranaweera, Chatura, 2022. "Former customers’ E-WOM in social media platforms: An investigation of motives, network size and social ties," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 118-133.
    4. Rex V. Brown, 2012. "Decision theory as an aid to private choice," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 7(2), pages 207-223, March.
    5. Eslami, Seyed Pouyan & Ghasemaghaei, Maryam, 2018. "Effects of online review positiveness and review score inconsistency on sales: A comparison by product involvement," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 74-80.
    6. Radu Lixăndroiu & Dana Lupșa-Tătaru, 2023. "Switzerland? The Best Choice for Accommodation in Europe for Skiing in the 2023 Season," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Jezierski Adam & Wszendybył-Skulska Ewa & Kopera Sebastian, 2022. "Crisis-Resistant Tourists – A Study of Hotel Online Reviews in the Times of Covid-19," Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 29(4), pages 29-36, December.
    8. repec:cup:judgdm:v:7:y:2012:i:2:p:207-223 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Amélie Clauzel & Hélène Delacour & Sébastien Liarte, 2019. "When cuisine becomes less haute : The impact of expert ratings on consumers' legitimacy judgments," Post-Print hal-02513471, HAL.
    10. Bronner, Fred & de Hoog, Robert, 2016. "Travel websites: Changing visits, evaluations and posts," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 94-112.
    11. Zaman, Mustafeed & Vo-Thanh, Tan & Nguyen, Chi T.K. & Hasan, Rajibul & Akter, Shahriar & Mariani, Marcello & Hikkerova, Lubica, 2023. "Motives for posting fake reviews: Evidence from a cross-cultural comparison," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    12. Sergio M. Fernández-Miguélez & Miguel Díaz-Puche & Juan A. Campos-Soria & Federico Galán-Valdivieso, 2020. "The Impact of Social Media on Restaurant Corporations’ Financial Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, February.
    13. Zhang, Hao & Liang, Xiaoning & Qi, Chenyue, 2021. "Investigating the impact of interpersonal closeness and social status on electronic word-of-mouth effectiveness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 453-461.
    14. Bilbao-Terol, Amelia & Bilbao-Terol, Celia, 2024. "The Choquet integral supported by a hedonic approach for modelling preferences in hotel selection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    15. Juan Pedro Aznar, 2021. "Differentiation and pricing strategies for hotels in sun and beach destinations," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(2), pages 289-293, March.
    16. Ehsan Khanmohammadi & Mostafa Zandieh & Talieh Tayebi, 2019. "Drawing a Strategy Canvas Using the Fuzzy Best–Worst Method," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 20(1), pages 57-75, March.
    17. Kichan Nam & Jeff Baker & Norita Ahmad & Jahyun Goo, 2020. "Dissatisfaction, Disconfirmation, and Distrust: an Empirical Examination of Value Co-Destruction through Negative Electronic Word-of-Mouth (eWOM)," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 113-130, February.
    18. Sheng, Jie & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Wang, Xiaojun, 2017. "A multidisciplinary perspective of big data in management research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 97-112.
    19. Donthu, Naveen & Kumar, Satish & Pandey, Neeraj & Pandey, Nitesh & Mishra, Akanksha, 2021. "Mapping the electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) research: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 758-773.
    20. Francisco B. Galarza & Gabriella Wong, 2017. "The Impact of Price Information on Consumer Behavior: An Experiment," Working Papers 106, Peruvian Economic Association.
    21. KARRI PASANEN & MIKKO KURTTILA & JOUNI PYKÄlÄINEN & JYRKI KANGAS & PEKKA LESKINEN, 2005. "Mesta — Non-Industrial Private Forest Owners' Decision-Support Environment For The Evaluation Of Alternative Forest Plans Over The Internet," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(04), pages 601-620.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infott:v:23:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s40558-021-00200-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.