IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v146y2022icp118-133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Former customers’ E-WOM in social media platforms: An investigation of motives, network size and social ties

Author

Listed:
  • Azer, Jaylan
  • Ranaweera, Chatura

Abstract

Former customers can potentially be highly beneficial to firms, however, their e-WOM activity has been neglected in prior research. This research recognises the need to broaden e-WOM research, especially regarding how former customers engage in e-WOM, what motivates them to do so and the impact they have in online social networks. The results of an online survey and two experimental studies empirically establish the role of former customers in online social networks, provide insights about their motives for engaging in e-WOM about goods and services they no longer use, and their impact in online social networks, which depends on the characteristics of these networks. Former customers with small networks and strong social ties have the strongest impact on other actors, followed by those with large networks and what this paper terms utilitarian ties. From a managerial perspective, this research identifies the role of former customers in online social networks and their optimal behaviours for the firm in terms of e-WOM sharing and recommends distinct ways in which the influencing behaviour of former customers should be managed.

Suggested Citation

  • Azer, Jaylan & Ranaweera, Chatura, 2022. "Former customers’ E-WOM in social media platforms: An investigation of motives, network size and social ties," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 118-133.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:146:y:2022:i:c:p:118-133
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296322003058
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew Alexander & Elina Jaakkola & Linda Hollebeek, 2018. "Zooming out: actor engagement beyond the dyadic," Post-Print hal-02008939, HAL.
    2. King, Robert Allen & Racherla, Pradeep & Bush, Victoria D., 2014. "What We Know and Don't Know About Online Word-of-Mouth: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 167-183.
    3. Ana Babić Rosario & Kristine Valck & Francesca Sotgiu, 2020. "Conceptualizing the electronic word-of-mouth process: What we know and need to know about eWOM creation, exposure, and evaluation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 422-448, May.
    4. Vargo, Stephen L. & Lusch, Robert F., 2017. "Service-dominant logic 2025," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 46-67.
    5. Anita Pansari & V. Kumar, 2017. "Customer engagement: the construct, antecedents, and consequences," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 294-311, May.
    6. Russell W. Belk, 2013. "Extended Self in a Digital World," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(3), pages 477-500.
    7. Park, Jin-Woo & Robertson, Rodger & Wu, Cheng-Lung, 2004. "The effect of airline service quality on passengers’ behavioural intentions: a Korean case study," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 10(6), pages 435-439.
    8. Wang, Fang & Menon, Kalyani & Ranaweera, Chatura, 2018. "Dynamic trends in online product ratings: A diagnostic utility explanation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 80-89.
    9. David Godes & Dina Mayzlin, 2004. "Using Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth Communication," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 545-560, June.
    10. Wendy W. Moe & David A. Schweidel, 2012. "Online Product Opinions: Incidence, Evaluation, and Evolution," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 372-386, May.
    11. Jonah Berger & Alan T. Sorensen & Scott J. Rasmussen, 2010. "Positive Effects of Negative Publicity: When Negative Reviews Increase Sales," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(5), pages 815-827, 09-10.
    12. Sparks, Beverley A. & Browning, Victoria, 2011. "The impact of online reviews on hotel booking intentions and perception of trust," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1310-1323.
    13. Pan, Lee-Yun & Chiou, Jyh-Shen, 2011. "How Much Can You Trust Online Information? Cues for Perceived Trustworthiness of Consumer-generated Online Information," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 67-74.
    14. Veloutsou, Cleopatra & Chatzipanagiotou, Kalliopi & Christodoulides, George, 2020. "The consumer-based brand equity deconstruction and restoration process: Lessons from unliked brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 41-51.
    15. repec:ucp:bkecon:9780226316529 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Swani, Kunal & Milne, George R., 2017. "Evaluating Facebook brand content popularity for service versus goods offerings," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 123-133.
    17. Rajkumar Venkatesan, 2017. "Executing on a customer engagement strategy," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 289-293, May.
    18. Brown, Jacqueline Johnson & Reingen, Peter H, 1987. "Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 14(3), pages 350-362, December.
    19. Menon, Kalyani & Ranaweera, Chatura, 2018. "Beyond close vs. distant ties: Understanding post-service sharing of information with close, exchange, and hybrid ties," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 154-169.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Azer, Jaylan & Anker, Thomas & Taheri, Babak & Tinsley, Ross, 2023. "Consumer-Driven racial stigmatization: The moderating role of race in online consumer-to-consumer reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    2. Kumar, Jitender & Katiyar, Gagan & Mehrotra, Ankit & Attri, Rekha & Vishnoi, Sushant Kumar, 2024. "Connecting BOP consumers and retailers: What drives small-time retailing through social media?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    3. Janina Seutter, 2024. "The origination of online reviews in B2B markets: A qualitative study of the underlying motives of review writers," Working Papers Dissertations 118, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana Babić Rosario & Kristine Valck & Francesca Sotgiu, 2020. "Conceptualizing the electronic word-of-mouth process: What we know and need to know about eWOM creation, exposure, and evaluation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 422-448, May.
    2. Katsifaraki, Georgia D. & Theodosiou, Marios, 2020. "How different (dis)engagement behaviors affect performance within an e-market ecosystem: A longitudinal analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 578-591.
    3. Colmekcioglu, Nazan & Marvi, Reza & Foroudi, Pantea & Okumus, Fevzi, 2022. "Generation, susceptibility, and response regarding negativity: An in-depth analysis on negative online reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 235-250.
    4. Guiyang Xiong & Sundar Bharadwaj, 2014. "Prerelease Buzz Evolution Patterns and New Product Performance," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 401-421, May.
    5. Akbari, Morteza & Foroudi, Pantea & Zaman Fashami, Rahime & Mahavarpour, Nasrin & Khodayari, Maryam, 2022. "Let us talk about something: The evolution of e-WOM from the past to the future," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 663-689.
    6. Li Jie & Xue Wenyi & Yang Fang & Li Yakun, 2017. "An Integrated Research Framework for Effect of EWOM," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 5(4), pages 343-355, August.
    7. Andrew E. Wilson & Michael D. Giebelhausen & Michael K. Brady, 2017. "Negative word of mouth can be a positive for consumers connected to the brand," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 534-547, July.
    8. Khim-Yong Goh & Cheng-Suang Heng & Zhijie Lin, 2013. "Social Media Brand Community and Consumer Behavior: Quantifying the Relative Impact of User- and Marketer-Generated Content," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 88-107, March.
    9. Chan, Haksin & Yang, Morgan X. & Zeng, Kevin J., 2022. "Bolstering ratings and reviews systems on multi-sided platforms: A co-creation perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 208-217.
    10. Dominik Gutt & Jürgen Neumann & Steffen Zimmermann & Dennis Kundisch & Jianqing Chen, 2018. "Design of Review Systems - A Strategic Instrument to shape Online Review Behavior and Economic Outcomes," Working Papers Dissertations 42, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    11. Agnieszka Zablocki & Bodo Schlegelmilch & Michael J. Houston, 2019. "How valence, volume and variance of online reviews influence brand attitudes," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(1), pages 61-77, June.
    12. Tata, Sai Vijay & Prashar, Sanjeev & Gupta, Sumeet, 2020. "An examination of the role of review valence and review source in varying consumption contexts on purchase decision," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    13. Young Joon Park & Jaewoo Joo & Charin Polpanumas & Yeujun Yoon, 2021. "“Worse Than What I Read?” The External Effect of Review Ratings on the Online Review Generation Process: An Empirical Analysis of Multiple Product Categories Using Amazon.com Review Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, September.
    14. Boegershausen, Johannes & Datta, Hannes & Borah, Abhishek & Stephen, Andrew, 2022. "Fields of Gold: Web Scraping and APIs for Impactful Marketing Insights," Other publications TiSEM 5f1ed70a-48c3-422c-bc10-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    15. Koji Ishida & Lisa Slevitch & Katia Siamionava, 2016. "The Effects of Traditional and Electronic Word-of-Mouth on Destination Image: A Case of Vacation Tourists Visiting Branson, Missouri," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-17, September.
    16. Golmohammadi, Alireza & Mattila, Anna S. & Gauri, Dinesh K., 2020. "Negative online reviews and consumers’ service consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 27-36.
    17. Sun, Xiaochi & Foscht, Thomas & Eisingerich, Andreas B., 2021. "Does educating customers create positive word of mouth?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    18. Marchand, André & Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten & Wiertz, Caroline, 2017. "Not all digital word of mouth is created equal: Understanding the respective impact of consumer reviews and microblogs on new product success," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 336-354.
    19. Yuchi Zhang & David Godes, 2018. "Learning from Online Social Ties," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(3), pages 425-444, May.
    20. Plotkina, Daria & Munzel, Andreas, 2016. "Delight the experts, but never dissatisfy your customers! A multi-category study on the effects of online review source on intention to buy a new product," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 1-11.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:146:y:2022:i:c:p:118-133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.