IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/vyid10.1007_s10796-016-9719-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Keep the conversations going: engagement-based customer segmentation on online social service platforms

Author

Listed:
  • Nripesh Trivedi

    (Banaras Hindu University)

  • Daniel Adomako Asamoah

    (Wright State University)

  • Derek Doran

    (Wright State University)

Abstract

Most businesses and organizations develop online services as a value-added offering, which is a significant revenue stream from their existing user base. Such services may be enhanced with social elements to serve as value-added tools for user attraction and retention. Social elements may allow users to post content, share information and directly interact with each other. Investments in these social features are for naught if they do not encourage users to engage on the platform effectively. However, common ways to segment customers by their engagement is hindered by the statistical nature of behavioral data based on social elements. To address this important concern, this paper presents a methodological framework for engagement-based customer segmentation able to appropriately consider signals from social elements. It argues why the traditional approaches for user segmentation is ill-suited and advocates for the integration of kernel functions with clustering to segment, identify and understand user engagement profiles. The framework is demonstrated with real data from a large, very active OSS.

Suggested Citation

  • Nripesh Trivedi & Daniel Adomako Asamoah & Derek Doran, 0. "Keep the conversations going: engagement-based customer segmentation on online social service platforms," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-19.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v::y::i::d:10.1007_s10796-016-9719-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-016-9719-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-016-9719-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-016-9719-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ioannis Arapakis & Mounia Lalmas & B. Barla Cambazoglu & Mari-Carmen Marcos & Joemon M. Jose, 2014. "User engagement in online News: Under the scope of sentiment, interest, affect, and gaze," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 65(10), pages 1988-2005, October.
    2. Heather L. O'Brien & Elaine G. Toms, 2010. "The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(1), pages 50-69, January.
    3. Mu Xia & Yun Huang & Wenjing Duan & Andrew B. Whinston, 2012. "Research Note ---To Continue Sharing or Not to Continue Sharing? An Empirical Analysis of User Decision in Peer-to-Peer Sharing Networks," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 247-259, March.
    4. Heather L. O'Brien & Elaine G. Toms, 2008. "What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 59(6), pages 938-955, April.
    5. Sonali K. Shah, 2006. "Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(7), pages 1000-1014, July.
    6. Heather L. O'Brien & Elaine G. Toms, 2010. "The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(1), pages 50-69, January.
    7. David Constant & Lee Sproull & Sara Kiesler, 1996. "The Kindness of Strangers: The Usefulness of Electronic Weak Ties for Technical Advice," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 119-135, April.
    8. Ogonowski, Andrzej & Montandon, Andrew & Botha, Elsamari & Reyneke, Mignon, 2014. "Should new online stores invest in social presence elements? The effect of social presence on initial trust formation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 482-491.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Syed Sardar Muhammad & Bidit Lal Dey & Vishanth Weerakkody, 2018. "Analysis of Factors that Influence Customers’ Willingness to Leave Big Data Digital Footprints on Social Media: A Systematic Review of Literature," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 559-576, June.
    2. Raed S. Algharabat & Nripendra P. Rana, 0. "Social Commerce in Emerging Markets and its Impact on Online Community Engagement," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-22.
    3. Raed S. Algharabat & Nripendra P. Rana, 2021. "Social Commerce in Emerging Markets and its Impact on Online Community Engagement," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 1499-1520, December.
    4. Sahar Karimi, 2021. "Cross-visiting Behaviour of Online Consumers Across Retailers’ and Comparison Sites, a Macro-Study," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 531-542, June.
    5. Ashish Gupta & Amit Deokar & Lakshmi Iyer & Ramesh Sharda & Dave Schrader, 2018. "Big Data & Analytics for Societal Impact: Recent Research and Trends," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 185-194, April.
    6. Gaganmeet Kaur Awal & K. K. Bharadwaj, 2019. "Leveraging collective intelligence for behavioral prediction in signed social networks through evolutionary approach," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 417-439, April.
    7. Chuang Wang & Rongxin Zhou & Matthew K. O. Lee, 2021. "Can loyalty be pursued and achieved? An extended RFD model to understand and predict user loyalty to mobile apps," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(7), pages 824-838, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nripesh Trivedi & Daniel Adomako Asamoah & Derek Doran, 2018. "Keep the conversations going: engagement-based customer segmentation on online social service platforms," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 239-257, April.
    2. Heather L. O'Brien, 2017. "Antecedents and learning outcomes of online news engagement," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(12), pages 2809-2820, December.
    3. Zixing Shen & Michael J. Pritchard, 2022. "Cognitive engagement on social media: A study of the effects of visual cueing in educational videos," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(9), pages 1253-1267, September.
    4. Bitrián, Paula & Buil, Isabel & Catalán, Sara, 2021. "Enhancing user engagement: The role of gamification in mobile apps," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 170-185.
    5. Kexin Zhao & Bin Zhang & Xue Bai, 2018. "Estimating Contextual Motivating Factors in Virtual Interorganizational Communities of Practice: Peer Effects and Organizational Influences," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 910-927, December.
    6. Carolina Herrando & Julio Jiménez-Martínez & María José Martín-De Hoyos, 2017. "Passion at first sight: how to engage users in social commerce contexts," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 701-720, December.
    7. Simona VINEREAN & Alin OPREANA, 2015. "Consumer Engagement in Online Settings: Conceptualization and Validation of Measurement Scales," Expert Journal of Marketing, Sprint Investify, vol. 3(2), pages 35-50.
    8. Pagani, Margherita & Malacarne, Giovanni, 2017. "Experiential Engagement and Active vs. Passive Behavior in Mobile Location-based Social Networks: The Moderating Role of Privacy," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 133-148.
    9. Zhuojun Gu & Ravi Bapna & Jason Chan & Alok Gupta, 2022. "Measuring the Impact of Crowdsourcing Features on Mobile App User Engagement and Retention: A Randomized Field Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 1297-1329, February.
    10. Omar Besbes & Yonatan Gur & Assaf Zeevi, 2016. "Optimization in Online Content Recommendation Services: Beyond Click-Through Rates," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 15-33, February.
    11. Tina Katika & Ioannis Karaseitanidis & Dimitra Tsiakou & Christos Makropoulos & Angelos Amditis, 2022. "Augmented Reality (AR) Supporting Citizen Engagement in Circular Economy," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 1077-1104, September.
    12. Orland Hoeber & Morgan Harvey & Shaheed Ahmed Dewan Sagar & Matthew Pointon, 2022. "The effects of simulated interruptions on mobile search tasks," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(6), pages 777-796, June.
    13. Shelly Rathee & Kritika Narula & Arul Mishra & Himanshu Mishra, 2023. "Alphanumeric vs. Numeric Token Systems and the Healthcare Experience: Field Evidence from Healthcare Delivery in India," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 1180-1221, February.
    14. Makram Soui & Mabrouka Chouchane & Narjes Bessghaier & Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer & Marouane Kessentini, 2022. "On the Impact of Aesthetic Defects on the Maintainability of Mobile Graphical User Interfaces: An Empirical Study," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 659-676, April.
    15. Tamilla Triantoro & Ram Gopal & Raquel Benbunan-Fich & Guido Lang, 0. "Personality and games: enhancing online surveys through gamification," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-10.
    16. Jong-Long Guo & Hsiao-Pei Hsu & Mei-Hsun Lin & Cheng-Yu Lin & Chiu-Mieh Huang, 2020. "Testing the Usability of Digital Educational Games for Encouraging Smoking Cessation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-14, April.
    17. Chakraborty, Debarun & Polisetty, Aruna & Rana, Nripendra P., 2024. "Consumers' continuance intention towards metaverse-based virtual stores: A multi-study perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    18. Caitríona Ní Shé & Eabhnat Ní Fhloinn & Ciarán Mac an Bhaird, 2023. "Student Engagement with Technology-Enhanced Resources in Mathematics in Higher Education: A Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-34, February.
    19. Luo, Lijuan & Xu, Meiling & Zheng, Yujie, 2024. "Informative or affective? Exploring the effects of streamers’ topic types on user engagement in live streaming commerce," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    20. Grant, Stephanie M. & Hodge, Frank D. & Sinha, Roshan K., 2018. "How disclosure medium affects investor reactions to CEO bragging, modesty, and humblebragging," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 68, pages 118-134.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v::y::i::d:10.1007_s10796-016-9719-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.