IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v25y2023i1d10.1007_s10796-020-10059-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustaining Open Source Communities by Understanding the Influence of Discursive Manifestations on Sentiment

Author

Listed:
  • Denis Dennehy

    (National University of Ireland Galway)

  • Kieran Conboy

    (National University of Ireland Galway)

  • Jennifer Ferreira

    (Victoria University of Wellington)

  • Jaganath Babu

    (National University of Ireland Galway)

Abstract

Sustaining open source (OS) communities is fundamental to the long-term success of any open source software (OSS) project. An OSS project consists of a community of software developers who are part of a larger business ecosystem involving hardware and software companies. Peer review of software code, known as patch review comments, is an important quality assurance activity for OSS development that requires developers to provide feedback concerning their degree of satisfaction. Despite the importance of feedback, which can affect sentiment of OS communities, the underlying discourse has not been studied. In this study, we use Activity Theory to identify and categorise 20,651 discursive manifestations of contradictions that occurred in patch review comments of a large, evolving OS community. Unique community-specific expressions are identified and mapped to developers’ sentiment during a software release cycle. The study contributes new insights concerning discursive manifestations of contradictions as a driving force for sustaining OS communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Denis Dennehy & Kieran Conboy & Jennifer Ferreira & Jaganath Babu, 2023. "Sustaining Open Source Communities by Understanding the Influence of Discursive Manifestations on Sentiment," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 241-257, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:25:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10796-020-10059-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-020-10059-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-020-10059-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-020-10059-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matt Germonprez & Julie E. Kendall & Kenneth E. Kendall & Lars Mathiassen & Brett Young & Brian Warner, 2017. "A Theory of Responsive Design: A Field Study of Corporate Engagement with Open Source Communities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 64-83, March.
    2. Michael Hertel & Julia Wiesent, 2013. "Investments in information systems: A contribution towards sustainability," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 15(5), pages 815-829, November.
    3. Bram Klievink & Bart-Jan Romijn & Scott Cunningham & Hans Bruijn, 2017. "Big data in the public sector: Uncertainties and readiness," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 267-283, April.
    4. Shuk Ying Ho & Arun Rai, 2017. "Continued Voluntary Participation Intention in Firm-Participating Open Source Software Projects," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 603-625, September.
    5. White, Leroy & Burger, Katharina & Yearworth, Mike, 2016. "Understanding behaviour in problem structuring methods interventions with activity theory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 983-1004.
    6. Jan Kietzmann, 2008. "Interactive innovation of technology for mobile work," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 305-320, June.
    7. Francesco Perrini & Antonio Tencati, 2006. "Sustainability and stakeholder management: the need for new corporate performance evaluation and reporting systems," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(5), pages 296-308, September.
    8. Dan Sholler & Igor Steinmacher & Denae Ford & Mara Averick & Mike Hoye & Greg Wilson, 2019. "Ten simple rules for helping newcomers become contributors to open projects," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-10, September.
    9. Peter M. Bednar & Christine Welch, 2020. "Socio-Technical Perspectives on Smart Working: Creating Meaningful and Sustainable Systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 281-298, April.
    10. Ashish Gupta & Amit Deokar & Lakshmi Iyer & Ramesh Sharda & Dave Schrader, 2018. "Big Data & Analytics for Societal Impact: Recent Research and Trends," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 185-194, April.
    11. Ilias O. Pappas & Patrick Mikalef & Michail N. Giannakos & John Krogstie & George Lekakos, 2018. "Big data and business analytics ecosystems: paving the way towards digital transformation and sustainable societies," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 479-491, August.
    12. Stan Karanasios & David Allen, 2014. "Mobile technology in mobile work: contradictions and congruencies in activity systems," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5), pages 529-542, September.
    13. Paul Beynon-Davies, 2010. "The enactment of significance: a unified conception of information, systems and technology," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 389-408, August.
    14. Maha Shaikh & Emmanuelle Vaast, 2016. "Folding and Unfolding: Balancing Openness and Transparency in Open Source Communities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 813-833, December.
    15. Gamel O Wiredu & Carsten Sørensen, 2006. "The dynamics of control and mobile computing in distributed activities," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 307-319, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Schulz & Heiko Gewald & Markus Böhm & Helmut Krcmar, 2023. "Smart Mobility: Contradictions in Value Co-Creation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1125-1145, June.
    2. Emanuele Gabriel Margherita & Alessio Maria Braccini, 2021. "Industry 4.0 Technologies in Flexible Manufacturing for Sustainable Organizational Value: Reflections from a Multiple Case Study of Italian Manufacturers," Post-Print hal-03442440, HAL.
    3. Peter M. Bednar & Christine Welch, 0. "Socio-Technical Perspectives on Smart Working: Creating Meaningful and Sustainable Systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-18.
    4. Christian Kauten & Ashish Gupta & Xiao Qin & Glenn Richey, 2022. "Predicting Blood Donors Using Machine Learning Techniques," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 1547-1562, October.
    5. Stephanie Winkelmann & Rajae Guennoun & Frederik Möller & Thorsten Schoormann & Hendrik Valk, 2024. "Back to a resilient future: Digital technologies for a sustainable supply chain," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 315-350, June.
    6. Emanuele Gabriel Margherita & Alessio Maria Braccini, 2023. "Industry 4.0 Technologies in Flexible Manufacturing for Sustainable Organizational Value: Reflections from a Multiple Case Study of Italian Manufacturers," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 995-1016, June.
    7. Peter M. Bednar & Christine Welch, 2020. "Socio-Technical Perspectives on Smart Working: Creating Meaningful and Sustainable Systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 281-298, April.
    8. Davit Marikyan & Savvas Papagiannidis & Eleftherios Alamanos, 2023. "Cognitive Dissonance in Technology Adoption: A Study of Smart Home Users," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1101-1123, June.
    9. Hou, Shengjie & Zhang, Xiang & Yi, Biyi & Tang, Yi, 2022. "Public attitudes on open source communities in China: A text mining analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    10. Xuan Yang & Xiao Li & Daning Hu & Harry Jiannan Wang, 2021. "Differential impacts of social influence on initial and sustained participation in open source software projects," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(9), pages 1133-1147, September.
    11. Hajiheydari, Nastaran & Delgosha, Mohammad Soltani & Olya, Hossein, 2021. "Scepticism and resistance to IoMT in healthcare: Application of behavioural reasoning theory with configurational perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    12. Raed A.I. Abueed & Mehmet Aga, 2019. "Sustainable Knowledge Creation and Corporate Outcomes: Does Corporate Data Governance Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-15, October.
    13. Lami, Isabella M. & Tavella, Elena, 2019. "On the usefulness of soft OR models in decision making: A comparison of Problem Structuring Methods supported and self-organized workshops," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(3), pages 1020-1036.
    14. Qinghua Zheng & Chutong Yang & Haijun Yang & Jianhe Zhou, 2020. "A Fast Exact Algorithm for Deployment of Sensor Nodes for Internet of Things," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 829-842, August.
    15. Yang, Xiaoping & Cao, Dongmei & Andrikopoulos, Panagiotis & Yang, Zonghan & Bass, Tina, 2020. "Online social networks, media supervision and investment efficiency: An empirical examination of Chinese listed firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    16. Jia Xu & Jiuchang Wei & Liangdong Lu, 2019. "Strategic stakeholder management, environmental corporate social responsibility engagement, and financial performance of stigmatized firms derived from Chinese special environmental policy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 1027-1044, September.
    17. Chavatip Chindavijak & Kongkiti Phusavat & Pekka Kess & Suparerk Sooksamarn, 2016. "Transformation to Enterprise Sustainability Case Studies of Manufacturing and Service Enterprise in Thailand," Managing Innovation and Diversity in Knowledge Society Through Turbulent Time: Proceedings of the MakeLearn and TIIM Joint International Conference 2016,, ToKnowPress.
    18. Damminda Alahakoon & Rashmika Nawaratne & Yan Xu & Daswin Silva & Uthayasankar Sivarajah & Bhumika Gupta, 2023. "Self-Building Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning to Empower Big Data Analytics in Smart Cities," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 221-240, February.
    19. Marius Banke & Stephanie Lenger & Christiane Pott, 2022. "ESG Ratings in the Corporate Reporting of DAX40 Companies in Germany: Effects on Market Participants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, August.
    20. Mariëtte van Huijstee & Pieter Glasbergen, 2008. "The practice of stakeholder dialogue between multinationals and NGOs," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(5), pages 298-310, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:25:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10796-020-10059-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.