IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v24y2022i6d10.1007_s10796-022-10245-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disaster Management Knowledge Analysis Framework Validated

Author

Listed:
  • Dedi I. Inan

    (Universitas Papua)

  • Ghassan Beydoun

    (University of Technology Sydney)

  • Biswajeet Pradhan

    (University of Technology Sydney
    Sejong University
    King Abdulaziz University
    Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia)

Abstract

In Disaster Management (DM), reusing knowledge of best practices from past experiences is envisaged as the best approach for dealing with future disasters. But analysing and modelling processes involved in those experiences is a well-known challenge. But the efficient storage of those processes to allow reuse by others in future DM endeavours is even more challenging and less discussed. Without an efficient process in place, DM knowledge reuse becomes even more remote as the effort incurred gets construed as a hindrance to more pressing activities during the execution of disaster activities. Efficiency has to also be pursued without compromising the effectiveness of the knowledge analysis and reuse. It is important to ensure that knowledge remains meaningful and relevant after it is transformed. This paper presents and validates a DM knowledge analysis framework (DMKAF 2.0) that caters for efficient transformation of DM knowledge intended for reuse. The paper demonstrates that undertaking knowledge transformation and storage in the context of its use is crucial in DM for both, effectiveness and efficiency of the transformation process. Design Science Research methodology guides the research undertaken, by informing enhancements and how the framework is evaluated. A real case study of flood DM from the State Emergency Service of Victoria State Australia is successfully used to validate these enhancements.

Suggested Citation

  • Dedi I. Inan & Ghassan Beydoun & Biswajeet Pradhan, 2022. "Disaster Management Knowledge Analysis Framework Validated," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 2077-2097, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:24:y:2022:i:6:d:10.1007_s10796-022-10245-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-022-10245-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-022-10245-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-022-10245-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juhani Iivari, 2015. "Distinguishing and contrasting two strategies for design science research," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 107-115, January.
    2. Tongtong Li & Qi Wang & Zheng Xie, 2019. "Disaster response knowledge and its social determinants: A cross-sectional study in Beijing, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-10, March.
    3. John Venable & Jan Pries-Heje & Richard Baskerville, 2016. "FEDS: a Framework for Evaluation in Design Science Research," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 77-89, January.
    4. Elia, Gianluca & Margherita, Alessandro, 2018. "Can we solve wicked problems? A conceptual framework and a collective intelligence system to support problem analysis and solution design for complex social issues," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 279-286.
    5. Dedi Iskandar Inan & Ghassan Beydoun & Simon Opper, 2018. "Agent-Based Knowledge Analysis Framework in Disaster Management," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 783-802, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dedi I. Inan & Ghassan Beydoun & Siti Hajar Othman, 2023. "Risk Assessment and Sustainable Disaster Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-5, March.
    2. Dedi I. Inan & Ghassan Beydoun & Siti Hajar Othman & Biswajeet Pradhan & Simon Opper, 2022. "Developing Reusable COVID-19 Disaster Management Plans Using Agent-Based Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dedi I. Inan & Ghassan Beydoun & Siti Hajar Othman & Biswajeet Pradhan & Simon Opper, 2022. "Developing Reusable COVID-19 Disaster Management Plans Using Agent-Based Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Raffaele Fabio Ciriello & Alexandra Cecilie Gjøl Torbensen & Magnus Rotvit Perlt Hansen & Christoph Müller-Bloch, 2023. "Blockchain-based digital rights management systems: Design principles for the music industry," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Andreas Engelmann & Gerhard Schwabe, 2024. "Certified data chats for future used car markets," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Livermore, David & Van Dyne, Linn & Ang, Soon, 2022. "Organizational CQ: Cultural intelligence for 21st-century organizations," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 671-680.
    5. Paola Lara Machado & Montijn Ven & Banu Aysolmaz & Oktay Turetken & Jan Brocke, 2024. "Navigating Business Model Redesign: The Compass Method for Identifying Changes to the Operating Model," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 66(5), pages 607-638, October.
    6. Tom Lewandowski & Emir Kučević & Stephan Leible & Mathis Poser & Tilo Böhmann, 2023. "Enhancing conversational agents for successful operation: A multi-perspective evaluation approach for continuous improvement," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Hendrik Haße & Hendrik Valk & Frederik Möller & Boris Otto, 2022. "Design Principles for Shared Digital Twins in Distributed Systems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(6), pages 751-772, December.
    8. Joshua Holstein & Max Schemmer & Johannes Jakubik & Michael Vössing & Gerhard Satzger, 2023. "Sanitizing data for analysis: Designing systems for data understanding," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Laleh Rafati & Geert Poels, 2017. "Value-Driven Strategic Sourcing Based on Service-Dominant Logic," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 275-287, December.
    10. Ghassan Beydoun & Sergiu Dascalu & Dale Dominey-Howes & Andrew Sheehan, 2018. "Disaster Management and Information Systems: Insights to Emerging Challenges," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 649-652, August.
    11. Moutinho, José da Assunção & Fernandes, Gabriela & Rabechini, Roque, 2024. "Evaluation in design science: A framework to support project studies in the context of University Research Centres," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    12. Ali Hassan Gillani & Mohamed Izham Mohamed Ibrahim & Jamshaid Akbar & Yu Fang, 2020. "Evaluation of Disaster Medicine Preparedness among Healthcare Profession Students: A Cross-Sectional Study in Pakistan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-14, March.
    13. Ilse Hellemans & Amanda J. Porter & Damla Diriker, 2022. "Harnessing digitalization for sustainable development: Understanding how interactions on sustainability‐oriented digital platforms manage tensions and paradoxes," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 668-683, February.
    14. Julius Peter Landwehr & Niklas Kühl & Jannis Walk & Mario Gnädig, 2022. "Design Knowledge for Deep-Learning-Enabled Image-Based Decision Support Systems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(6), pages 707-728, December.
    15. Christian Meske & Enrico Bunde, 2023. "Design Principles for User Interfaces in AI-Based Decision Support Systems: The Case of Explainable Hate Speech Detection," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 743-773, April.
    16. João Barata & Paulo Rupino Cunha & António Dias Figueiredo, 2023. "Self-reporting Limitations in Information Systems Design Science Research," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(2), pages 143-160, April.
    17. Judit Oláh & József Popp & Szabolcs Duleba & Anna Kiss & Zoltán Lakner, 2021. "Positioning Bio-Based Energy Systems in a Hypercomplex Decision Space—A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-23, July.
    18. Pascal Fechner & Fabian König & Jannik Lockl & Maximilian Röglinger, 2024. "How Artificial Intelligence Challenges Tailorable Technology Design," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 66(3), pages 357-376, June.
    19. Albanese, Massimo, 2023. "Reviewing literature through multidimensional representations," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    20. Gianluca Elia & Alessandro Margherita & Claudio Petti, 2020. "Building responses to sustainable development challenges: A multistakeholder collaboration framework and application to climate change," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2465-2478, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:24:y:2022:i:6:d:10.1007_s10796-022-10245-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.