IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/binfse/v66y2024i3d10.1007_s12599-024-00872-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Artificial Intelligence Challenges Tailorable Technology Design

Author

Listed:
  • Pascal Fechner

    (University of Bayreuth
    University of Bayreuth)

  • Fabian König

    (University of Applied Sciences Augsburg
    Branch Business & Information Systems Engineering of the Fraunhofer FIT)

  • Jannik Lockl

    (University of Bayreuth
    University College London)

  • Maximilian Röglinger

    (University of Bayreuth
    Branch Business & Information Systems Engineering of the Fraunhofer FIT)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has significantly advanced healthcare and created unprecedented opportunities to enhance patient-centeredness and empowerment. This progress promotes individualized medicine, where treatment and care are tailored to each patient’s unique needs and characteristics. The Theory of Tailorable Technology Design has considerable potential to contribute to individualized medicine as it focuses on information systems (IS) that users can modify and redesign in the context of use. While the theory accounts for both the designer and user perspectives in the lifecycle of an IS, it does not reflect the inductive learning and autonomy of AI throughout the tailoring process. Therefore, this study posits the conjecture that current knowledge about tailorable technology design does not effectively account for IS that incorporate AI. To investigate this conjecture and challenge the Theory of Tailorable Technology Design, a revelatory design study of an AI-enabled individual IS in the domain of bladder monitoring is conducted. Based on the empirical evidence from the design study, the primary contribution of this work lies in three propositions for the design of tailorable technology, culminating in a Revised Theory of Tailorable Technology Design. As the outcome of the design study, the secondary contribution of this work is concrete design knowledge for AI-enabled individualized bladder monitoring systems that empower patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD). Overall, this study highlights the value of AI for patient-centeredness in IS design.

Suggested Citation

  • Pascal Fechner & Fabian König & Jannik Lockl & Maximilian Röglinger, 2024. "How Artificial Intelligence Challenges Tailorable Technology Design," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 66(3), pages 357-376, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:binfse:v:66:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s12599-024-00872-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s12599-024-00872-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12599-024-00872-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12599-024-00872-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Venable & Jan Pries-Heje & Richard Baskerville, 2016. "FEDS: a Framework for Evaluation in Design Science Research," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 77-89, January.
    2. Samir Chatterjee & Jongbok Byun & Kaushik Dutta & Rasmus Ulslev Pedersen & Akshay Pottathil & Harry (Qi) Xie, 2018. "Designing an Internet-of-Things (IoT) and sensor-based in-home monitoring system for assisting diabetes patients: iterative learning from two case studies," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(6), pages 670-685, November.
    3. Wolfgang Kratsch & Jonas Manderscheid & Maximilian Röglinger & Johannes Seyfried, 2021. "Machine Learning in Business Process Monitoring: A Comparison of Deep Learning and Classical Approaches Used for Outcome Prediction," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 63(3), pages 261-276, June.
    4. Amir Zadeh & David Taylor & Margaret Bertsos & Timothy Tillman & Nasim Nosoudi & Scott Bruce, 2021. "Predicting Sports Injuries with Wearable Technology and Data Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1023-1037, August.
    5. Lukas-Valentin Herm & Theresa Steinbach & Jonas Wanner & Christian Janiesch, 2022. "A nascent design theory for explainable intelligent systems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2185-2205, December.
    6. Allen S. Lee & Richard L. Baskerville, 2003. "Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(3), pages 221-243, September.
    7. Alvisa Palese & Sara Buchini & Laura Deroma & Fabio Barbone, 2010. "The effectiveness of the ultrasound bladder scanner in reducing urinary tract infections: a meta‐analysis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(21‐22), pages 2970-2979, November.
    8. Raquel Benbunan-Fich, 2019. "An affordance lens for wearable information systems," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 256-271, May.
    9. Mohamed Abouzahra & Maryam Ghasemaghaei, 2022. "Effective use of information technologies by seniors: the case of wearable device use," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 241-255, March.
    10. Steven Alter, 2008. "Defining information systems as work systems: implications for the IS field," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 448-469, October.
    11. Wanda J. Orlikowski, 1992. "The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(3), pages 398-427, August.
    12. Annette Wenninger & Daniel Rau & Maximilian Röglinger, 2022. "Improving customer satisfaction in proactive service design," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1399-1418, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emmanuelle Vaast & Geoff Walsham, 2009. "Trans-Situated Learning: Supporting a Network of Practice with an Information Infrastructure," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 547-564, December.
    2. Miralles, Francesc & Sieber, Sandra & Valor, Josep, 2005. "CIO herds and user gangs in the adoption of open source software," IESE Research Papers D/595, IESE Business School.
    3. Daniel Fürstenau & Martin Gersch & Stefanie Schreiter, 2023. "Digital Therapeutics (DTx)," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(3), pages 349-360, June.
    4. Monideepa Tarafdar & Cary L Cooper & Jean‐françois Stich, 2018. "The technostress trifecta - techno eustress, techno distress and design: Theoretical directions and an agenda for research," Post-Print hal-01689038, HAL.
    5. João Barata & Paulo Rupino Cunha & António Dias Figueiredo, 2023. "Self-reporting Limitations in Information Systems Design Science Research," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(2), pages 143-160, April.
    6. Manoj A. Thomas & Yan Li & Allen S. Lee, 2022. "Generalizing the Information Systems Artifact," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1452-1466, December.
    7. Gunasekaran, Angappa & Irani, Zahir & Choy, King-Lun & Filippi, Lionel & Papadopoulos, Thanos, 2015. "Performance measures and metrics in outsourcing decisions: A review for research and applications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 153-166.
    8. Bianco, Federica & Michelino, Francesca, 2010. "The role of content management systems in publishing firms," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 117-124.
    9. Donald Gerwin & Nicholas J. Barrowman, 2002. "An Evaluation of Research on Integrated Product Development," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(7), pages 938-953, July.
    10. Mariek Vanden Abeele & Ralf De Wolf & Rich Ling, 2018. "Mobile Media and Social Space: How Anytime, Anyplace Connectivity Structures Everyday Life," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 5-14.
    11. Cécile Godé & Jean-Fabrice Lebraty, 2008. "Decisional Fit under Turbulent Circumstances," Post-Print hal-00354480, HAL.
    12. Cécile Godé & Sébastien Brion & Amélie Bohas, 2020. "The Affordance-Actualization process in a Predictive Policing Context: insights from the French Military Police," Post-Print hal-02500125, HAL.
    13. Pradeep Racherla & Munir Mandviwalla, 2013. "Moving from Access to Use of the Information Infrastructure: A Multilevel Sociotechnical Framework," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 709-730, September.
    14. Michael Vössing & Niklas Kühl & Matteo Lind & Gerhard Satzger, 2022. "Designing Transparency for Effective Human-AI Collaboration," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 877-895, June.
    15. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4907 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Chris Kimble & Paul Hildreth, 2004. "Communities of Practice: Going One Step Too Far?," Post-Print halshs-00489632, HAL.
    17. Patrick Regnér & Udo Zander, 2011. "Knowledge and Strategy Creation in Multinational Companies," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 821-850, December.
    18. Zhewei Zhang & Youngjin Yoo & Kalle Lyytinen & Aron Lindberg, 2021. "The Unknowability of Autonomous Tools and the Liminal Experience of Their Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1192-1213, December.
    19. Leroux, Erick & Pupion, Pierre-Charles, 2022. "Smart territories and IoT adoption by local authorities: A question of trust, efficiency, and relationship with the citizen-user-taxpayer," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    20. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Sabine Carton & Carine Dominguez-Perry & Emmanuelle Vaast, 2012. "Performativity and Information Technologies: An inter-organizational perspective," Post-Print halshs-00851315, HAL.
    21. Peng, Zeyu & Sun, Yongqiang & Guo, Xitong, 2018. "Antecedents of employees’ extended use of enterprise systems: An integrative view of person, environment, and technology," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 104-120.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:binfse:v:66:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s12599-024-00872-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.