IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v1y1999i1d10.1023_a1010012712144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Manufacturing in the Digital Age: Exploiting Information Technologies for Product Realization

Author

Listed:
  • Anantaram Balakrishnan

    (Penn State University)

  • Soundar R. T. Kumara

    (Penn State University)

  • Shankar Sundaresan

    (Penn State University)

Abstract

Information technology (IT) is both the key enabler for future manufacturing enterprises and a transformer of organizations and markets. By reducing barriers to collaboration, compressing lead time, eliminating physical movement, and enriching decision-making, IT helps manufacturers achieve their goal of meeting customer needs better, quicker, and cheaper. By providing global reach and easy connectivity, information technology has fostered cooperation while increasing market competition, and heightened customer expectations. Advances in computer and communication technologies combined with rapid changes in organizations have created new opportunities for exploiting information technologies in the entire product realization process. This paper explores these opportunities, and identifies promising directions for both basic and applied research. We first review important trends in organizations, markets, and information technologies—from increasing customer involvement and opportunistic organizational alliances to global reach and connectivity, enterprise integration, and virtualization. Adopting a process viewpoint of the product realization cycle, we translate these trends into high-impact IT applications in design and operations that offer rich potential for applied research and development. Underlying these applications are four broad classes of intelligent information processes—intelligent search, diagnosis and prognosis, collaboration, coordination, and negotiation, and understanding and learning. And, software agents provide an ideal platform to implement these processes. We briefly review developments in these basic research fields, and identify necessary scientific advances that are most important from the manufacturing perspective. Our goal is to synthesize streams of thought from many related disciplines in engineering, science, and management, and develop a framework for examining how information technologies can facilitate and influence manufacturing.

Suggested Citation

  • Anantaram Balakrishnan & Soundar R. T. Kumara & Shankar Sundaresan, 1999. "Manufacturing in the Digital Age: Exploiting Information Technologies for Product Realization," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 25-50, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:1:y:1999:i:1:d:10.1023_a:1010012712144
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1010012712144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1010012712144
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1010012712144?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hammer, Michael & Champy, James, 1993. "Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 90-91.
    2. Hau L. Lee & Corey Billington & Brent Carter, 1993. "Hewlett-Packard Gains Control of Inventory and Service through Design for Localization," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 1-11, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Azeta Tartaraj & Ervin Myftaraj, 2013. "The Importance of the Price Factor in the Development of E-Commerce. Case Study B2C in Albania," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 2, March.
    2. Chagas, B.T. & Jesus, D. & Palma-dos-Reis, A., 2024. "Blockchain's value proposition for online gambling: The operators' perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    3. Susanne Hügel & Markus Kreutzer & Nico B. Rottke, 2019. "Firm Innovativeness In Service Industries: A Construct Validation In The External Environment And Industry Structure Contexts," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(06), pages 1-57, August.
    4. Libby Weber, 2023. "Hierarchy and managers matter more than ever in the digital age: unexamined psychological transaction costs in bossless companies," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 12(1), pages 41-45, June.
    5. Amit Kumar Kushwaha & Ruchika Pharswan & Prashant Kumar & Arpan Kumar Kar, 2023. "How Do Users Feel When They Use Artificial Intelligence for Decision Making? A Framework for Assessing Users’ Perception," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1241-1260, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Toppen, R. & Smits, M.T. & Ribbers, P.M.A., 1998. "Improving process performance through market network design : A study of the impact of electronic markets in the financial securities sector," Other publications TiSEM c3c8d2ea-7727-475e-83cf-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Byrd, T. A. & Marshall, T. E., 1997. "Relating information technology investment to organizational performance: a causal model analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 43-56, February.
    3. Félicia Saïah & Diego Vega & Harwin de Vries & Joakim Kembro, 2023. "Process modularity, supply chain responsiveness, and moderators: The Médecins Sans Frontières response to the Covid‐19 pandemic," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(5), pages 1490-1511, May.
    4. V.K. Gupta, 2016. "Strategic framework for managing forces of continuity and change in innovation and risk management in service sector: a study of service industry in India," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 23(1), pages 1-17.
    5. Douglas Dean & Richard Orwig & Douglas Vogel, 2000. "Facilitation Methods for Collaborative Modeling Tools," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 109-128, March.
    6. Harry Hummels & Patrick Nullens, 2022. "‘Other-wise’ Organizing. A Levinasian Approach to Agape in Work and Business Organisations," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 211-232, October.
    7. Magdalena LUCA (DEDIU), 2014. "Business Process Reengineering," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 233-236.
    8. Tina George Karippacheril & Soonhee Kim & Robert P. Jr. Beschel & Changyong Choi, 2016. "Bringing Government into the 21st Century," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 24579.
    9. Stephan Kudyba, 2006. "Enhancing Organisational Information Flow And Knowledge Creation In Re-Engineering Supply Chain Systems: An Analysis Of The U.S. Automotive Parts And Supplies Model," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 10(02), pages 163-173.
    10. Nurmi, Raimo, 1998. "Knowledge-intensive firms," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 26-32.
    11. Csaba Deák, 2005. "Change by Successful Projects - IT and Change Projects in Hungary," Theory Methodology Practice (TMP), Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 3(01), pages 17-22.
    12. Daniele Binci, 2013. "L?equilibrio organizzativo attraverso il clima. L?evidenza empirica di un ente locale," ECONOMIA E DIRITTO DEL TERZIARIO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(1), pages 65-97.
    13. Vansina, L.S. & Taillieu, T.C.B., 1994. "Business process reengineering or socio-technical system design in new clothes?," WORC Paper 94.09.064/3, Tilburg University, Work and Organization Research Centre.
    14. repec:tkp:ijsrsy:v:2:y:2012:i:2:p:73-91 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Rajat Roy & Justine Brown & Chris Gaze, 2003. "Re-engineering the construction process in the speculative house-building sector," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 137-146.
    16. Awolusi & Olawumi Dele & Akeke & Niyi Isreal & Akinruwa & Temitope Emmanuel, 2014. "Modeling Business Process Re-Engineering and Organizational Performance in the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry," International Journal of Management Sciences, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 3(5), pages 336-350.
    17. Fındık, Derya & Beyhan, Berna, 2014. "A Perceptual Measure of Innovation Performance: Micro Level Evidence from Turkey," MPRA Paper 60961, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Jacques Simonin & Selmin Nurcan & Judith Barrios, 2013. "Evolution organisationnelle fondée sur la cohérence des relations entre acteurs avec les buts métiers," Post-Print hal-00831621, HAL.
    19. Charalambos Vlados & Fotios Katimertzopoulos, 2019. "The ¡°Mystery¡± of Innovation: Bridging the Economic and Business Thinking and the Stra.Tech.Man Approach," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(1), pages 236-262, March.
    20. Sharda, Bikram & Akiya, Naoko, 2012. "Selecting make-to-stock and postponement policies for different products in a chemical plant: A case study using discrete event simulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 161-171.
    21. Fuglseth, A. M. & Grønhaug, K., 1997. "IT-enabled redesign of complex and dynamic business processes: the case of bank credit evaluation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 93-106, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:1:y:1999:i:1:d:10.1023_a:1010012712144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.