IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v18y2016i6d10.1007_s10796-016-9649-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using serious games to manage knowledge and competencies: The seven-step development process

Author

Listed:
  • Oihab Allal-Chérif

    (Kedge Business School)

  • Marc Bidan

    (Nantes University)

  • Mohamed Makhlouf

    (Kedge Business School)

Abstract

This article explores how serious games improve knowledge and competencies management in the context of human resources management. The exploratory research, based on the conceptual framework of the SECI model from Nonaka, analyzes the performances of three serious games developed in 3 different financial companies, from France, USA and India. These three case studies will help to define a 7-step development process of a knowledge and competencies management serious game. The banking sector has interesting characteristics for this study, some of the associated knowledge being both very standardized and also highly heterogeneous. It will be shown that serious games contribute significantly to improve “socialization”, “externalization”, “combination”, and “internalization” of knowledge and that they promote benchmarking throughout the company.

Suggested Citation

  • Oihab Allal-Chérif & Marc Bidan & Mohamed Makhlouf, 2016. "Using serious games to manage knowledge and competencies: The seven-step development process," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1153-1163, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:18:y:2016:i:6:d:10.1007_s10796-016-9649-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-016-9649-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-016-9649-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-016-9649-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ikujiro Nonaka & Georg von Krogh, 2009. "Perspective---Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 635-652, June.
    2. Frédéric Wacheux, 1996. "Méthodes qualitatives de recherches en gestion," Post-Print hal-00157140, HAL.
    3. Stephen Gourlay, 2006. "Conceptualizing Knowledge Creation: A Critique of Nonaka's Theory," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(7), pages 1415-1436, November.
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3659 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. José Braga Vasconcelos & Chris Kimble & Álvaro Rocha, 2016. "A special issue on knowledge and competence management: Developing Enterprise solutions," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1035-1039, December.
    2. Dudek Adam & Patalas-Maliszewska Justyna, 2016. "A Model of a Tacit Knowledge Transformation for the Service Department in a Manufacturing Company: A Case Study," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 175-188, January.
    3. Allal-Chérif, Oihab & Lombardo, Evelyne & Jaotombo, Franck, 2022. "Serious games for managers: Creating cognitive, financial, technological, social, and emotional value in in-service training," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 166-175.
    4. Newbery, Robert & Lean, Jonathan & Moizer, Jonathan & Haddoud, Mohamed, 2018. "Entrepreneurial identity formation during the initial entrepreneurial experience: The influence of simulation feedback and existing identity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 51-59.
    5. Canonico, Paolo & De Nito, Ernesto & Esposito, Vincenza & Pezzillo Iacono, Mario & Consiglio, Stefano, 2020. "Knowledge creation in the automotive industry: Analysing obeya-oriented practices using the SECI model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 450-457.
    6. Allal-Chérif, Oihab & Yela Aránega, Alba & Castaño Sánchez, Rafael, 2021. "Intelligent recruitment: How to identify, select, and retain talents from around the world using artificial intelligence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    7. Allal-Chérif, Oihab, 2022. "Intelligent cathedrals: Using augmented reality, virtual reality, and artificial intelligence to provide an intense cultural, historical, and religious visitor experience," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    8. Hakmaoui, Abdelati & Oubrich, Mourad & Calof, Jonathan & El Ghazi, Hamid, 2022. "Towards an anticipatory system incorporating corporate foresight and competitive intelligence in creating knowledge: a longitudinal Moroccan bank case study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    9. Kwee Keong Choong & Patrick W. Leung, 2022. "A Critical Review of the Precursors of the Knowledge Economy and Their Contemporary Research: Implications for the Computerized New Economy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1573-1610, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giovana Escrivão & Marcelo Seido Nagano, 2016. "Linking Knowledge Creation and Environmental Education," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Kwee Keong Choong & Patrick W. Leung, 2022. "A Critical Review of the Precursors of the Knowledge Economy and Their Contemporary Research: Implications for the Computerized New Economy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1573-1610, June.
    3. Chris Kimble, 2013. "Knowledge management, codification and tacit knowledge," Post-Print halshs-00826911, HAL.
    4. Maria Jakubik, 2018. "Practice Ecosystem of Knowledge Co-Creation," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia, vol. 7(2), pages 199-216.
    5. Sunday Bolade & Stavros Sindakis, 2020. "Micro-Foundation of Knowledge Creation Theory: Development of a Conceptual Framework Theory," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(4), pages 1556-1572, December.
    6. Niamh Brennan & Collette E. Kirwan & John Redmond, 2016. "Accountability Processes in Boardrooms: A Conceptual Model of Manager-Non-Executive Director Information Asymmetry," Open Access publications 10197/7652, Research Repository, University College Dublin.
    7. Allal-Chérif, Oihab & Makhlouf, Mohamed, 2016. "Using serious games to manage knowledge: The SECI model perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1539-1543.
    8. Esterhuizen, D. & Schutte, C.S.L. & du Toit, A.S.A., 2012. "Knowledge creation processes as critical enablers for innovation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 354-364.
    9. Bi, Jianxiang & Sarpong, David & Botchie, David & Rao-Nicholson, Rekha, 2017. "From imitation to innovation: The discursive processes of knowledge creation in the Chinese space industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 261-270.
    10. Lirios Alos-Simo & Antonio J. Verdu-Jover & Jose M. Gomez-Gras, 2020. "Knowledge Transfer in Sustainable Contexts: A Comparative Analysis of Periods of Financial Recession and Expansion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-24, June.
    11. Boeker, Warren & Howard, Michael D. & Basu, Sandip & Sahaym, Arvin, 2021. "Interpersonal relationships, digital technologies, and innovation in entrepreneurial ventures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 495-507.
    12. Kawai, Norifumi & Chung, Chul, 2019. "Expatriate utilization, subsidiary knowledge creation and performance: The moderating role of subsidiary strategic context," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 24-36.
    13. Sung Hyo Hong, 2021. "Determinants of Selection of R&D Cooperation Partners: Insights from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-11, August.
    14. Mário Franco & Lurdes Esteves & Margarida Rodrigues, 2024. "Clusters as a Mechanism of Sharing Knowledge and Innovation: Case Study from a Network Approach," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 25(2), pages 377-400, April.
    15. Zhanna A. Mingaleva & Lyudmila N. Deputatova & Nikolay B. Akatov & Yurii V. Starkov & Elena Mitrofanova, 2019. "Application of HADI-cycle for providing sustainability of processes of knowledge and innovation," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(2), pages 1628-1640, December.
    16. Shan, Wei & Qiao, Tong & Zhang, Mingli, 2020. "Getting more resources for better performance: The effect of user-owned resources on the value of user-generated content," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    17. Deist, Maximilian K. & McDowell, William C. & Bouncken, Ricarda B., 2023. "Digital units and digital innovation: Balancing fluidity and stability for the Creation, Conversion, and Dissemination of sticky knowledge," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    18. Ngoc Thach Pham & Anh Duc Do & Quang Vinh Nguyen & Van Loi Ta & Thi Thanh Binh Dao & Dieu Linh Ha & Xuan Truong Hoang, 2021. "Research on Knowledge Management Models at Universities Using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    19. Mohajan, Haradhan, 2016. "Sharing of Tacit Knowledge in Organizations: A Review," MPRA Paper 82958, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Jun 2016.
    20. Wei-Shong Lin & Jui-Ling Huang & Margaret L. Sheng, 2014. "How the Organizational Goals Affect Knowledge Management," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia, vol. 3(1), pages 3-22.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:18:y:2016:i:6:d:10.1007_s10796-016-9649-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.