IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v18y2016i1d10.1007_s10796-015-9580-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Achieving better usability of software supporting learning activities of large groups

Author

Listed:
  • Nelson Baloian

    (Universidad de Chile)

  • Gustavo Zurita

    (Universidad de Chile)

Abstract

Many business schools around the world offer courses to train their students in acquiring so called “soft skills”, such as working in teams for decision making or sharing information to collaboratively solve complex problems. These courses often include learning activities where students are asked to generate ideas, discuss them, rank them and select the best ones. In order to develop their IT skills, students are often asked to take advantage of available IT technologies for supporting this task. If geographical location information is prominently used to provide context information about the ideas students propose and discuss, this activity can be classified as geo-collaborative. Free software available from the web has often been used to support this kind of work, like Google Maps, for geo-referencing the ideas, the text editor of Google Drive for describing them and Twitter or Facebook to exchange messages and comments. These applications are robust and suitable for use by large groups of students engaged in a situated learning activity. In the context of a learning activity taking place in a business school in Chile, the authors observed students for four semesters collaboratively using these tools to identify ways of improving life or solving problems in certain areas of the city which have to be georeferenced on a map. They had to generate proposals, discuss them and select the ten best. Through feedback provided by students, we identified problems regaring information overload, the lack of support for collaboration and unsatisfactory usability. From these findings we derived requirements for software especially designed to support this learning activity and have a tool that offers better usability. A prototype was developed to cope with these requirements. It was used for two semesters and evaluated under the same conditions when students used free and/or standard software. The experiment yielded positive results and gave us valuable insight on how to implement main features of a system supporting learning activities for large groups that includes decision making, blogging and geo-collaboration.

Suggested Citation

  • Nelson Baloian & Gustavo Zurita, 2016. "Achieving better usability of software supporting learning activities of large groups," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 125-144, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:18:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s10796-015-9580-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-015-9580-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-015-9580-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-015-9580-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hajar Mousannif & Ismail Khalil & Gabriele Kotsis, 2013. "Collaborative learning in the clouds," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 159-165, April.
    2. Timothy R. Hill & Malu Roldan, 2005. "Toward Third Generation Threaded Discussions for Mobile Learning: Opportunities and Challenges for Ubiquitous Collaborative Environments," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 55-70, February.
    3. Efraim Turban & Ting-Peng Liang & Shelly P. J. Wu, 2011. "A Framework for Adopting Collaboration 2.0 Tools for Virtual Group Decision Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 137-154, March.
    4. Simon Buckingham Shum & Lorella Cannavacciuolo & Anna De Liddo & Luca Iandoli & Ivana Quinto, 2011. "Using Social Network Analysis to Support Collective Decision-Making Process," International Journal of Decision Support System Technology (IJDSST), IGI Global, vol. 3(2), pages 15-31, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gert-Jan Vreede & Pedro Antunes & Julita Vassileva & Marco Aurélio Gerosa & Kewen Wu, 2016. "Collaboration technology in teams and organizations: Introduction to the special issue," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 1-6, February.
    2. Michael A. Erskine & Dawn G. Gregg & Jahangir Karimi & Judy E. Scott, 2019. "Individual Decision-Performance Using Spatial Decision Support Systems: A Geospatial Reasoning Ability and Perceived Task-Technology Fit Perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 1369-1384, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yong Xie & Hongwei Wang, 2014. "A Group Cooperative Decision Support System Based on Extended Contract Net," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 1191-1217, September.
    2. Al-Alawi, Baha M. & Coker, Alexander D., 2018. "Multi-criteria decision support system with negotiation process for vehicle technology selection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 278-296.
    3. Panigrahi, Ritanjali & Srivastava, Praveen Ranjan & Sharma, Dheeraj, 2018. "Online learning: Adoption, continuance, and learning outcome—A review of literature," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1-14.
    4. Kamal Abubker Abrahim Sleiman & Lan Juanli & Hongzhen Lei & Ru Liu & Yuanxin Ouyang & Wenge Rong, 2021. "User Trust levels and Adoption of Mobile Payment Systems in China: An Empirical Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    5. Ricardo J. G. Mateus & João C. Bana e Costa & Pedro Verga Matos, 2017. "Supporting Multicriteria Group Decisions with MACBETH Tools: Selection of Sustainable Brownfield Redevelopment Actions," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 495-521, May.
    6. Jeanine Warisse Turner & N. Lamar Reinsch, 2010. "Successful and unsuccessful multicommunication episodes: Engaging in dialogue or juggling messages?," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 277-285, July.
    7. Thompson S. H. Teo & Sojung Lucia Kim & Li Jiang, 2020. "E-Learning Implementation in South Korea: Integrating Effectiveness and Legitimacy Perspectives," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 511-528, April.
    8. Thomas A. O’Neill & Samantha E. Hancock & Katarina Zivkov & Nicole L. Larson & Stephanie J. Law, 2016. "Team Decision Making in Virtual and Face-to-Face Environments," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 995-1020, September.
    9. João Carneiro & Diogo Martinho & Goreti Marreiros & Paulo Novais, 2019. "Arguing with Behavior Influence: A Model for Web-Based Group Decision Support Systems," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(02), pages 517-553, March.
    10. Choi, Jaewon & Lee, Hong Joo & Sajjad, Farhana & Lee, Habin, 2014. "The influence of national culture on the attitude towards mobile recommender systems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 65-79.
    11. Gabriele Kotsis & Ismail Khalil, 2013. "Special issue on Semantic Information Management guest editorial," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 151-157, April.
    12. Tavana, Madjid & Di Caprio, Debora, 2016. "Modeling synergies in multi-criteria supplier selection and order allocation: An application to commodity tradingAuthor-Name: Sodenkamp, Mariya A," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(3), pages 859-874.
    13. Chulhwan Chris Bang, 2015. "Information systems frontiers: Keyword analysis and classification," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 217-237, February.
    14. Vincent Cho & Aman Chan, 2015. "An integrative framework of comparing SaaS adoption for core and non-core business operations: An empirical study on Hong Kong industries," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 629-644, June.
    15. Md. Alamgir Hossain & Minho Kim, 2020. "A Comprehensive Study on Social Commerce in Social Networking Sites," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, June.
    16. Wenan Tan & Senbo Chen & Jingxian Li & Lingxia Li & Tong Wang & Xiaoming Hu, 2014. "A Trust Evaluation Model for E‐Learning Systems," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 353-365, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:18:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s10796-015-9580-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.