IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v9y2018i5d10.1007_s13198-018-0733-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A study of the sensitivity of sequence stacking strategies for the storage location assignment problem for out-bound containers in a maritime terminal

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto Guerra-Olivares

    (Tecnológico de Monterrey)

  • Neale R. Smith

    (Tecnológico de Monterrey)

  • Rosa G. González-Ramírez

    (Universidad de Los Andes, Chile)

  • Leopoldo Eduardo Cárdenas-Barrón

    (Tecnológico de Monterrey)

Abstract

Recently, a new approach to solve the outbound container location problem motivated by the Shanghai maritime terminals was published. This approach addresses the problem by decomposing it into two stages. The first stage is a mathematical programming model and the second stage is a heuristic algorithm whose objective is to minimize the total reshuffle movements executed during the loading operation. That study reports that the diagonal stacking configuration provides the best performance. Conversely, this paper documents the results of a study to observe the performance of the various staking strategies under different conditions that can occur regularly in real ports. The parameters that are varied are the number of tiers in each stack, the number of container weight levels, and the permitted bay utilization. The results show that although the diagonal stacking strategy does provide the best performance under some conditions, it does not yield the best performance in other parameter combinations. The horizontal strategy is found to perform best for most of the parameter combinations considered in this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Guerra-Olivares & Neale R. Smith & Rosa G. González-Ramírez & Leopoldo Eduardo Cárdenas-Barrón, 2018. "A study of the sensitivity of sequence stacking strategies for the storage location assignment problem for out-bound containers in a maritime terminal," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 9(5), pages 1057-1062, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:9:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s13198-018-0733-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-018-0733-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-018-0733-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-018-0733-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carlo, Héctor J. & Vis, Iris F.A. & Roodbergen, Kees Jan, 2014. "Storage yard operations in container terminals: Literature overview, trends, and research directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 412-430.
    2. Park, Taejin & Choe, Ri & Hun Kim, Young & Ryel Ryu, Kwang, 2011. "Dynamic adjustment of container stacking policy in an automated container terminal," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 385-392, September.
    3. Kim, Kap Hwan & Lee, Keung Mo & Hwang, Hark, 2003. "Sequencing delivery and receiving operations for yard cranes in port container terminals," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 283-292, June.
    4. Carlo, Héctor J. & Vis, Iris F.A. & Roodbergen, Kees Jan, 2014. "Transport operations in container terminals: Literature overview, trends, research directions and classification scheme," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 1-13.
    5. Woo, Youn Ju & Kim, Kap Hwan, 2011. "Estimating the space requirement for outbound container inventories in port container terminals," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 293-301, September.
    6. Lee, Der-Horng & Cao, Zhi & Meng, Qiang, 2007. "Scheduling of two-transtainer systems for loading outbound containers in port container terminals with simulated annealing algorithm," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 115-124, May.
    7. Chen, Lu & Lu, Zhiqiang, 2012. "The storage location assignment problem for outbound containers in a maritime terminal," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 73-80.
    8. Young Kim, Ki & Hwan Kim, Kap, 1999. "A routing algorithm for a single straddle carrier to load export containers onto a containership," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1-3), pages 425-433, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlo, Héctor J. & Vis, Iris F.A. & Roodbergen, Kees Jan, 2014. "Storage yard operations in container terminals: Literature overview, trends, and research directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 412-430.
    2. Chen, Xiaojing & Li, Feng & Jia, Bin & Wu, Jianjun & Gao, Ziyou & Liu, Ronghui, 2021. "Optimizing storage location assignment in an automotive Ro-Ro terminal," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 249-281.
    3. Youn Ju Woo & Jang-Ho Song & Kap Hwan Kim, 2016. "Pricing storage of outbound containers in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 644-668, December.
    4. Chenhao Zhou & Ek Peng Chew & Loo Hay Lee, 2018. "Information-Based Allocation Strategy for GRID-Based Transshipment Automated Container Terminal," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 707-721, June.
    5. Li, Wenkai & Goh, Mark & Wu, Yong & Petering, M.E.H. & de Souza, R. & Wu, Y.C., 2012. "A continuous time model for multiple yard crane scheduling with last minute job arrivals," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(2), pages 332-343.
    6. Kap Hwan Kim & Youn Ju Woo & Jae Gwan Kim, 0. "Space reservation and remarshalling operations for outbound containers in marine terminals," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 0, pages 1-25.
    7. Gharehgozli, Amir & Zaerpour, Nima, 2018. "Stacking outbound barge containers in an automated deep-sea terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 977-995.
    8. Kap Hwan Kim & Youn Ju Woo & Jae Gwan Kim, 2021. "Space reservation and remarshalling operations for outbound containers in marine terminals," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(1), pages 154-178, March.
    9. Amir Gharehgozli & Nima Zaerpour & Rene Koster, 2020. "Container terminal layout design: transition and future," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(4), pages 610-639, December.
    10. Facchini, F. & Digiesi, S. & Mossa, G., 2020. "Optimal dry port configuration for container terminals: A non-linear model for sustainable decision making," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 164-178.
    11. Damla Kizilay & Deniz Türsel Eliiyi, 2021. "A comprehensive review of quay crane scheduling, yard operations and integrations thereof in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-42, March.
    12. Shell Ying Huang & Ya Li, 2017. "Yard crane scheduling to minimize total weighted vessel loading time in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 689-720, December.
    13. Yu, Dayong & Li, Dong & Sha, Mei & Zhang, Dali, 2019. "Carbon-efficient deployment of electric rubber-tyred gantry cranes in container terminals with workload uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 552-569.
    14. Zhou, Chenhao & Lee, Byung Kwon & Li, Haobin, 2020. "Integrated optimization on yard crane scheduling and vehicle positioning at container yards," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    15. Böse, Jürgen W. & Jahn, Carlos & Sarin, Raman, 2014. "Vision of a Service Value Network in Maritime Container Logistics," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Next Generation Supply Chains: Trends and Opportunities. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), Vol. 18, volume 18, pages 87-110, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    16. Hang Yu & Yiyun Deng & Leijie Zhang & Xin Xiao & Caimao Tan, 2022. "Yard Operations and Management in Automated Container Terminals: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    17. Feng, Yuanjun & Song, Dong-Ping & Li, Dong, 2022. "Smart stacking for import containers using customer information at automated container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 502-522.
    18. Galle, Virgile & Barnhart, Cynthia & Jaillet, Patrick, 2018. "Yard Crane Scheduling for container storage, retrieval, and relocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 288-316.
    19. Hyun Ji Park & Sung Won Cho & Abhilasha Nanda & Jin Hyoung Park, 2023. "Data-driven dynamic stacking strategy for export containers in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 170-195, March.
    20. Ulf Speer & Kathrin Fischer, 2017. "Scheduling of Different Automated Yard Crane Systems at Container Terminals," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 305-324, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:9:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s13198-018-0733-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.