IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v9y2018i3d10.1007_s13198-017-0667-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A matter-element method for risk identification of technology innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Quan Xiao

    (Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics)

Abstract

With the rapid development of IT, technology innovation has attracted increasing attentions from governments, enterprises and researchers. It is notable that the failure rate of technology innovation is high and the risk cannot be ignored. Risk identification is a critical step of risk management and to identify risk accurately and effectively is important for technology innovation organizations. However, the extant risk identification approaches cannot be directly applied, due to the characteristics of technology innovation risk such as uncertainty and fuzziness. In this paper we introduce matter-element model, which is developed from extension theory, and can be employed to support the characteristics of technology innovation risk. On the basis of the traditional meta-model, this paper attempts to improve the schema, through constructing indicator system of technology innovation risk. We present a method of determining the weights of indicators based on minimum deviation, which integrates the AHP weight and entropy weight. Through the calculating process and sensitivity analysis, the risk factors of technology innovation with different features can be identified, and technology innovation organizations can formulate and perform targeted strategies toward different risk factors. Finally, based on an instance, we discuss the effectiveness of our method and draw the conclusions.

Suggested Citation

  • Quan Xiao, 2018. "A matter-element method for risk identification of technology innovation," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 9(3), pages 716-728, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:9:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s13198-017-0667-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-017-0667-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-017-0667-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-017-0667-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D Wu & D L Olson, 2010. "Enterprise risk management: coping with model risk in a large bank," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(2), pages 179-190, February.
    2. Bi, Kexin & Huang, Ping & Ye, Hui, 2015. "Risk identification, evaluation and response of low-carbon technological innovation under the global value chain: A case of the Chinese manufacturing industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 238-248.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hadef Hefaidh & Djebabra Mébarek, 2020. "A conceptual framework for risk matrix capitalization," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(3), pages 755-764, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Desheng Wu & David Olson, 2011. "Foreword," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 185(1), pages 1-3, May.
    2. Wu, Min & Shen, Qiping & Xu, Maozeng & Wu, Desheng, 2013. "Modeling stockout risk and JIT purchasing in ready-mixed concrete batching plants," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 14-19.
    3. Young Kim & Rosella Giacometti & Svetlozar Rachev & Frank Fabozzi & Domenico Mignacca, 2012. "Measuring financial risk and portfolio optimization with a non-Gaussian multivariate model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 201(1), pages 325-343, December.
    4. Chowdhury, Md. Maruf Hossan & Quaddus, Mohammed A., 2015. "A multiple objective optimization based QFD approach for efficient resilient strategies to mitigate supply chain vulnerabilities: The case of garment industry of Bangladesh☆,☆☆☆This manuscript was pro," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PA), pages 5-21.
    5. Yongrok Choi & Xiaoxia Ye & Lu Zhao & Amanda C. Luo, 2016. "Optimizing enterprise risk management: a literature review and critical analysis of the work of Wu and Olson," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 281-300, February.
    6. Huang, He & Xu, Hongyan, 2015. "Dual sourcing and backup production: Coexistence versus exclusivity," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PA), pages 22-33.
    7. Liu, Lirong & Huang, Guohe & Baetz, Brian & Guan, Yuru & Zhang, Kaiqiang, 2020. "Multi-Dimensional Hypothetical Fuzzy Risk Simulation model for Greenhouse Gas mitigation policy development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    8. Tak Siu, 2012. "A BSDE approach to risk-based asset allocation of pension funds with regime switching," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 201(1), pages 449-473, December.
    9. Inmaculada Rodríguez-Puerta & Alberto A. Álvarez-López, 2016. "Optimal allocation of a fixed production under price uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 121-142, February.
    10. Khaldoun M. Al-Qaisi & Rafat M. Al-Batayneh, 2018. "Risk Factors in Financial Services Industry: Application, Threats, Theoretical and Empirical literature in Management of Risk," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 8(2), pages 210-218.
    11. Kun Park & Ward Whitt, 2013. "Continuous-time Markov chain models to estimate the premium for extended hedge fund lockups," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 211(1), pages 357-379, December.
    12. Pritee Ray & Mamata Jenamani, 2016. "Sourcing decision under disruption risk with supply and demand uncertainty: A newsvendor approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 237-262, February.
    13. Ko, Chuan-Chuan & Lin, Tyrone T. & Yang, Chyan, 2011. "The venture capital entry model on game options with jump-diffusion process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 87-94, November.
    14. Chow, Pui-Sze & Wang, Yulan & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Shen, Bin, 2015. "An experimental study on the effects of minimum profit share on supply chains with markdown contract: Risk and profit analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PA), pages 85-97.
    15. David L. Olson & Scott R. Swenseth, 2014. "Trade‐offs in Supply Chain System Risk Mitigation," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 565-579, July.
    16. Desheng Dash Wu & Xie Kefan & Chen Gang & Gui Ping, 2010. "A Risk Analysis Model in Concurrent Engineering Product Development," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(9), pages 1440-1453, September.
    17. Yael Deutsch & Boaz Golany, 2016. "Multiple agents finitely repeated inspection game with dismissals," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 7-26, February.
    18. Xixuan Guo & Kaixiang Huang & Lanyu Li & Xiaonan Wang, 2022. "Renewable Energy for Balancing Carbon Emissions and Reducing Carbon Transfer under Global Value Chains: A Way Forward," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    19. Qicai Li & Mengdi Gu & Zhibing Liang, 2014. "Optimal excess-of-loss reinsurance and investment polices under the CEV model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 223(1), pages 273-290, December.
    20. Jieping Chen & Xianpeng Long & Shanlang Lin, 2022. "Special Economic Zone, Carbon Emissions and the Mechanism Role of Green Technology Vertical Spillover: Evidence from Chinese Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-22, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:9:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s13198-017-0667-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.