IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijphth/v55y2010i6p599-608.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Workplace smoking restrictions: smoking behavior and the intention to change among continuing smokers

Author

Listed:
  • Jeannette Rüge
  • Anja Broda
  • Sabina Ulbricht
  • Gudrun Klein
  • Hans-Jürgen Rumpf
  • Ulrich John
  • Christian Meyer

Abstract

Auch weiterhin rauchende Arbeitnehmer profitieren von Rauchbeschränkungen am Arbeitsplatz durch eine verminderte aktive Tabakrauchexposition und psychologische Effekte, welche die Bereitschaft zu Aufgabe des Rauchens erhöhen. Copyright Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel/Switzerland 2010

Suggested Citation

  • Jeannette Rüge & Anja Broda & Sabina Ulbricht & Gudrun Klein & Hans-Jürgen Rumpf & Ulrich John & Christian Meyer, 2010. "Workplace smoking restrictions: smoking behavior and the intention to change among continuing smokers," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 55(6), pages 599-608, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijphth:v:55:y:2010:i:6:p:599-608
    DOI: 10.1007/s00038-009-0111-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00038-009-0111-1
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00038-009-0111-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Verena Friedrich & Adrian Brügger & Georg Bauer, 2009. "Worksite tobacco prevention in the Canton of Zurich: stages of change, predictors, and outcomes," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 54(6), pages 427-438, December.
    2. Bauer, J.E. & Hyland, A. & Li, Q. & Steger, C. & Cummings, K.M., 2005. "A longitudinal assessment of the impact of smoke-free worksite policies on tobacco use," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 95(6), pages 1024-1029.
    3. Michael Halpern & Humphrey Taylor, 2009. "Beliefs regarding smoking in the workplace: results from the Global Workplace Smoking Survey," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 54(6), pages 391-401, December.
    4. Jie-Min Lee & Sheng-Hung Chen & Chi-Jung Hsieh, 2008. "Does perceived safety of light cigarette encourage smokers to smoke more or to inhale more deeply?," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 53(5), pages 236-244, October.
    5. J. Scott Long & Jeremy Freese, 2006. "Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables using Stata, 2nd Edition," Stata Press books, StataCorp LP, edition 2, number long2, March.
    6. Richard Williams, 2006. "Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 6(1), pages 58-82, March.
    7. Biener, L. & Abrams, D.B. & Follick, M.J. & Dean, L., 1989. "A comparative evaluation of a restrictive smoking policy in a general hospital," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 79(2), pages 192-195.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bruno Amable, 2009. "The Differentiation of Social Demands in Europe. The Social Basis of the European Models of Capitalism," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 91(3), pages 391-426, May.
    2. Richard Williams, 2009. "Using Heterogeneous Choice Models to Compare Logit and Probit Coefficients Across Groups," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 37(4), pages 531-559, May.
    3. Elvire Guillaud, 2013. "Preferences for redistribution: an empirical analysis over 33 countries," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 11(1), pages 57-78, March.
    4. Charlie Tchinda & Marcus Dejardin, 2021. "Are Business Policy Measures in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic to Be Equally Valued? An Exploration According to SMEs Owners’ Business Expectations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-42, October.
    5. Wixe, Sofia & Nilsson, Pia & Naldi, Lucia & Westlund, Hans, 2017. "Disentangling Innovation in Small Food Firms: The role of External Knowledge, Support, and Collaboration," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 446, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    6. Elvire Guillaud, 2008. "Preferences for redistribution: a European comparative analysis," Working Papers halshs-00586260, HAL.
    7. Xindong Xue & W. Robert Reed, 2015. "The Relationship Between Social Capital And Health In China," Working Papers in Economics 15/05, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
    8. Marine de Talance, 2017. "Wealth Inequalities in Perceptions of School Quality in Pakistan," Working Papers hal-01662698, HAL.
    9. Yi Han & Enying Zheng & Minya Xu, 2014. "The Influence from the Past: Organizational Imprinting and Firms’ Compliance with Social Insurance Policies in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 65-77, June.
    10. Richard Williams, 2010. "Fitting heterogeneous choice models with oglm," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 10(4), pages 540-567, December.
    11. Adewale Henry Adenuga & Claire Jack & Ronan McCarry, 2023. "Investigating the Factors Influencing the Intention to Adopt Long-Term Land Leasing in Northern Ireland," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, March.
    12. Caterina Astarita & Anna Crisci, 2023. "Stereotype logistic model: an application to the determinants of doctoral programme satisfaction in Italy," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(5), pages 4029-4047, October.
    13. Raúl Pozo-Rubio & Román Mínguez-Salido & Isabel Pardo-García & Francisco Escribano-Sotos, 2019. "Catastrophic long-term care expenditure: associated socio-demographic and economic factors," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(5), pages 691-701, July.
    14. Mukuria, Clara & Brazier, John, 2013. "Valuing the EQ-5D and the SF-6D health states using subjective well-being: A secondary analysis of patient data," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 97-105.
    15. Marine de Talancé, 2016. "Wealth inequalities in perceptions of school quality in Pakistan," Working Papers DT/2016/14, DIAL (Développement, Institutions et Mondialisation).
    16. Saphores, Jean-Daniel M. & Nixon, Hilary, 2014. "How effective are current household recycling policies? Results from a national survey of U.S. households," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 1-10.
    17. Wanger, Susanne, 2017. "What makes employees satisfied with their working time? : The role of working hours, time-sovereignty and working conditions for working time and job satisfaction," IAB-Discussion Paper 201720, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    18. Bertsch, Valentin & Hyland, Marie & Mahony, Michael, 2017. "What drives people's opinions of electricity infrastructure? Empirical evidence from Ireland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 472-497.
    19. Husain, Zakir & Ghosh, Saswata, 2010. "Is health status of elderly worsening in India:A comparison of successive rounds of National Sample Survey data," MPRA Paper 25747, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Saphores, Jean-Daniel M. & Ogunseitan, Oladele A. & Shapiro, Andrew A., 2012. "Willingness to engage in a pro-environmental behavior: An analysis of e-waste recycling based on a national survey of U.S. households," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 49-63.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijphth:v:55:y:2010:i:6:p:599-608. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.