IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijogbc/v17y2022i2d10.1007_s42943-022-00051-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Formulation of Proxy Measures: Measuring Business Model for Improving Competitiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Dinesh Panchal

    (Navrachana University)

  • Bala Krishnamoorthy

    (SVKM’s NMIMS)

  • Vivekanand Khanapuri

    (NITIE)

  • Ashu Sharma

    (SVKM’s NMIMS)

Abstract

This paper attempts to develop proxy measures for the business model dimensions (BMDs). In the empirical studies, the primary data with the survey method are not feasible, in some cases. Because either the data required are from distance past or measuring the construct without respondents’ biases is not feasible. The process started with indicators for each business model dimensions and logically linked these indicators with the tactical decision, strategic imperatives and finally to the elements from financial statements. These linkages were developed with the help of four experts and the validity of the same was tested with more experts. Additionally, the validity of the proxy measures was assessed using correlation analysis and paired sample t test. All the validation tests confirmed the suitability of proxy measures for the four business model dimensions. The measures developed in this paper will help academician to conduct the longitudinal studies. On practice front, these measures may help managers to analyze the firm’s performance or competitiveness with reference to BMDs. The current literature is still evolving when it comes to measuring the constructs related to business model dimensions. This paper is an attempt to contribute in that direction.

Suggested Citation

  • Dinesh Panchal & Bala Krishnamoorthy & Vivekanand Khanapuri & Ashu Sharma, 2022. "Formulation of Proxy Measures: Measuring Business Model for Improving Competitiveness," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 142-161, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijogbc:v:17:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s42943-022-00051-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s42943-022-00051-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42943-022-00051-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s42943-022-00051-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tridas Mukhopadhyay & Sunder Kekre, 2002. "Strategic and Operational Benefits of Electronic Integration in B2B Procurement Processes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(10), pages 1301-1313, October.
    2. Reyes González & Jose Gascó & Juan Llopis, 2016. "Information Systems Outsourcing Reasons and Risks: Review and Evolution," Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 223-249, October.
    3. Smirlock, Michael, 1985. "Evidence on the (Non) Relationship between Concentration and Profitability in Banking," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 17(1), pages 69-83, February.
    4. Zott, Christoph & Amit, Raphael & Massa, Lorenzo, 2010. "The business model: Theoretical roots, recent developments, and future research," IESE Research Papers D/862, IESE Business School.
    5. Charles Baden-Fuller & Vincent Mangematin, 2013. "Business models: A challenging agenda," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-00869707, HAL.
    6. Michael J. Dowling & Jeffrey E. McGee, 1994. "Business and Technology Strategies and New Venture Performance: A Study of the Telecommunications Equipment Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(12), pages 1663-1677, December.
    7. Lambert, Susan C. & Davidson, Robyn A., 2013. "Applications of the business model in studies of enterprise success, innovation and classification: An analysis of empirical research from 1996 to 2010," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 668-681.
    8. Christoph Zott & Raphael Amit, 2007. "Business Model Design and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 181-199, April.
    9. Ramanathan, R. & Ganesh, L. S., 1994. "Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members' weightages," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(2), pages 249-265, December.
    10. Charlotta Mellander & José Lobo & Kevin Stolarick & Zara Matheson, 2015. "Night-Time Light Data: A Good Proxy Measure for Economic Activity?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Bharadwaj, Neeraj & Naylor, Rebecca Walker & ter Hofstede, Frenkel, 2009. "Consumer response to and choice of customized versus standardized systems," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 216-227.
    12. Dinesh Panchal & Bala Krishnamoorthy, 2019. "Developing an Instrument for Business Model Dimensions: Exploring Linkages with Firm Competitiveness," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 24-41, December.
    13. Charles Baden-Fuller & Vincent Mangematin, 2013. "Business models: A challenging agenda," Post-Print hal-00869707, HAL.
    14. Dinesh B. Panchal & Bala Krishnamoorthy, 2020. "Emerging perspectives on business model typologies," International Journal of Business Excellence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 21(3), pages 410-428.
    15. Shumway, Tyler, 2001. "Forecasting Bankruptcy More Accurately: A Simple Hazard Model," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 74(1), pages 101-124, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ales Novak, 2014. "Business Model Literature Overview," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(1), pages 79-130.
    2. Täuscher, Karl & Laudien, Sven M., 2018. "Understanding platform business models: A mixed methods study of marketplaces," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 319-329.
    3. Budler, Marko & Župič, Ivan & Trkman, Peter, 2021. "The development of business model research: A bibliometric review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 480-495.
    4. Beatrice d'Ippolito, 2014. "The importance of design for firms' competitiveness: a review of the literature," Working paper serie RMT - Grenoble Ecole de Management hal-00936947, HAL.
    5. Adiloğlu-Yalçınkaya, Leyla & Besler, Senem, 2021. "Institutional factors influencing business models: The case of Turkish Airlines," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    6. Arash Rezazadeh & Ana Carvalho, 2018. "A value-based approach to business model innovation: Defining the elements of the concept," NIPE Working Papers 12/2018, NIPE - Universidade do Minho.
    7. Jean-Robert Agher & Patrice Dubois & Améziane Aoussat, 2021. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Product-Service Systems’ Design Methodologies: Potential Root-Cause Identification of PSS’ Failures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, June.
    8. Belussi, Fiorenza & Orsi, Luigi & Savarese, Maria, 2019. "Mapping Business Model Research: A Document Bibliometric Analysis," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3).
    9. Beatrice d'Ippolito, 2014. "The importance of design for firms' competitiveness: a review of the literature," Working Papers hal-00936947, HAL.
    10. Viktoriia Kyfyak & Andrii Antokhov & Serhii Todoriuk, 2021. "Business Model As A Value Management Tool," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 7(2).
    11. Hanna Rydehell, 2019. "Stakeholder Roles In Business Model Development In New Technology-Based Firms," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(04), pages 1-38, May.
    12. von Delft, Stephan & Zhao, Yang, 2021. "Business models in process industries: Emerging trends and future research," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    13. Simona Alfiero & Laura Broccardo & Massimo Cane, 2023. "Sustainable Business Model and the Firm Age Variable Impact: Evidence from wine industry," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(3), pages 165-191.
    14. Göran Roos, 2014. "Business Model Innovation to Create and Capture Resource Value in Future Circular Material Chains," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-27, March.
    15. Patrizia Di Tullio & Diego Valentinetti & Michele Antonio Rea, 2018. "Integrating The Business Model Puzzle: A Systematic Literature Review," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 9(1), pages 1-46, June.
    16. Maria Rosa De Giacomo & Raimund Bleischwitz, 2020. "Business models for environmental sustainability: Contemporary shortcomings and some perspectives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3352-3369, December.
    17. Laudien, Sven M. & Reuter, Ute & Sendra Garcia, Francisco Javier & Botella-Carrubi, Dolores, 2024. "Digital advancement and its effect on business model design: Qualitative-empirical insights," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    18. Gianvito Lanzolla & Constantinos Markides, 2021. "A Business Model View of Strategy," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 540-553, March.
    19. Candi, Marina & Kitagawa, Fumi, 2022. "Performance implications of business model centrality over technology-based firms’ life courses," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    20. Joan Enric Ricart & Yuliya Snihur & Carlos Carrasco-Farré & Pascual Berrone, 2020. "Grassroots Resistance to Digital Platforms and Relational Business Model Design to Overcome It: A Conceptual Framework," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(3), pages 271-291, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijogbc:v:17:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s42943-022-00051-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.