IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/grdene/v33y2024i4d10.1007_s10726-024-09882-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Novel Consensus and Dissent Framework Under Grey Preference Based on the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution for Two Decision Makers

Author

Listed:
  • Jinmuzi Zhang

    (Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics)

  • Haiyan Xu

    (Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics)

  • Ginger Y. Ke

    (Memorial University of Newfoundland)

Abstract

The existing consensus models of conflict decision-making generally assume that the decision-makers’ preferences are simple and certain. This assumption oversimplifies the complexity of real-world conflicts due to the ignorance of the decision-maker’s limited rationality. The present work makes the first attempt at solving this issue by defining the grey consensus and dissent preference of two decision makers (DMs), which is then embedded into the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution (GMCR) to obtain conflict equilibrium solutions. To be specific, preference relations are first described as interval grey scales to reflect the decision maker’s judgments on conflict states, and then converted into crisp values to interface with GMCR. We next present both the logical and matrix representations under the GMCR framework, along with detailed pseudocode that can be implemented to investigate actual conflict situations practically. For validation and verification purposes, the proposed decision framework is applied to the water resource conflict of the Yellow River Basin in China, from which insights are derived to facilitate effective strategic decision-making for resolving complex conflicts in uncertain environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinmuzi Zhang & Haiyan Xu & Ginger Y. Ke, 2024. "A Novel Consensus and Dissent Framework Under Grey Preference Based on the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution for Two Decision Makers," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 711-744, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:33:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10726-024-09882-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10726-024-09882-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-024-09882-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10726-024-09882-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chenxi Zhang & Meng Zhao & Lichao Zhao & Qinfei Yuan, 2021. "A Consensus Model for Large-Scale Group Decision-Making Based on the Trust Relationship Considering Leadership Behaviors and Non-cooperative Behaviors," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 553-586, June.
    2. Li, Yanhong & Kou, Gang & Li, Guangxu & Peng, Yi, 2022. "Consensus reaching process in large-scale group decision making based on bounded confidence and social network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 790-802.
    3. Xiaohong Chen & Weiwei Zhang & Xuanhua Xu & Wenzhi Cao, 2022. "Managing Group Confidence and Consensus in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Large Group Decision-Making Based on Social Media Data Mining," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 995-1023, October.
    4. Tiantian Gai & Mingshuo Cao & Francisco Chiclana & Zhen Zhang & Yucheng Dong & Enrique Herrera-Viedma & Jian Wu, 2023. "Consensus-trust Driven Bidirectional Feedback Mechanism for Improving Consensus in Social Network Large-group Decision Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 45-74, February.
    5. Bowen Zhang & Yucheng Dong & Enrique Herrera-Viedma, 2019. "Group Decision Making with Heterogeneous Preference Structures: An Automatic Mechanism to Support Consensus Reaching," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 585-617, June.
    6. Weijun Xu & Xin Chen & Yucheng Dong & Francisco Chiclana, 2021. "Impact of Decision Rules and Non-cooperative Behaviors on Minimum Consensus Cost in Group Decision Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(6), pages 1239-1260, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tiantian Gai & Mingshuo Cao & Francisco Chiclana & Zhen Zhang & Yucheng Dong & Enrique Herrera-Viedma & Jian Wu, 2023. "Consensus-trust Driven Bidirectional Feedback Mechanism for Improving Consensus in Social Network Large-group Decision Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 45-74, February.
    2. Xiao Tan & Jianjun Zhu & Tong Wu, 2022. "Dynamic Reference Point-Oriented Consensus Mechanism in Linguistic Distribution Group Decision Making Restricted by Quantum Integration of Information," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 491-528, April.
    3. Wenfeng Zhu & Hengjie Zhang & Jing Xiao, 2023. "Coming to Consensus on Classification in Flexible Linguistic Preference Relations: The Role of Personalized Individual Semantics," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(5), pages 1237-1271, October.
    4. Luo, Shucheng & Xu, Zeshui & Zhu, Bin, 2024. "A bilateral deliberation mechanism for conflict resolving with multi-actor and multi-criteria," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 319(1), pages 234-245.
    5. Monica Martinez-Blasco & Vanessa Serrano & Francesc Prior & Jordi Cuadros, 2023. "Analysis of an event study using the Fama–French five-factor model: teaching approaches including spreadsheets and the R programming language," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-34, December.
    6. Mei Cai & Yilong Heng, 2025. "Bidirectional Feedback Mechanism in Group Decision-Making: A Quantum Probability Theory Model Based on Interference Effects," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, January.
    7. Li-Chen Cheng & Wei-Ting Lu & Benjamin Yeo, 2023. "Predicting abnormal trading behavior from internet rumor propagation: a machine learning approach," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, December.
    8. Min Xue & Chao Fu & Shan-Lin Yang, 2021. "Dynamic Expert Reliability Based Feedback Mechanism in Consensus Reaching Process with Distributed Preference Relations," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 341-375, April.
    9. Sha Fan & Hengjie Zhang & Huali Tang, 2019. "A Linguistic Hierarchy Model with Self-Confidence Preference Relations and Its Application in Co-Regulation of Food Safety in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    10. Xiangrui Chao & Yucheng Dong & Gang Kou & Yi Peng, 2022. "How to determine the consensus threshold in group decision making: a method based on efficiency benchmark using benefit and cost insight," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(1), pages 143-177, September.
    11. Wu, Siqi & Wu, Meng & Dong, Yucheng & Liang, Haiming & Zhao, Sihai, 2020. "The 2-rank additive model with axiomatic design in multiple attribute decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(2), pages 536-545.
    12. Wenyu Yu & Zhen Zhang & Qiuyan Zhong, 2021. "Consensus reaching for MAGDM with multi-granular hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets: a minimum adjustment-based approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(2), pages 443-466, May.
    13. Hanyao Gao & Gang Kou & Haiming Liang & Hengjie Zhang & Xiangrui Chao & Cong-Cong Li & Yucheng Dong, 2024. "Machine learning in business and finance: a literature review and research opportunities," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-35, December.
    14. Phoebe Koundouri & Georgios I. Papayiannis & Electra V. Petracou & Athanasios N. Yannacopoulos, 2023. "Consensus group decision making under model uncertainty with a view towards environmental policy making," Papers 2312.00436, arXiv.org.
    15. Wei Xu & Junjun Mao & Mengmeng Zhu, 2023. "The Determination and Elimination of Decision Makers’ Hidden Inherent Preference in Probabilistic Linguistic Group Decision-Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(5), pages 1025-1060, October.
    16. Dombi, József & Jónás, Tamás, 2024. "Consensus measures based on a fuzzy concept," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 642-653.
    17. Hengjie Zhang & Fang Wang & Huali Tang & Yucheng Dong, 2019. "An Optimization-Based Approach to Social Network Group Decision Making with an Application to Earthquake Shelter-Site Selection," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-16, July.
    18. Wolfgang Kuhle, 2023. "Latency arbitrage and the synchronized placement of orders," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    19. Peng Wu & Jinpei Liu & Ligang Zhou & Huayou Chen, 2022. "An Integrated Group Decision-Making Method with Hesitant Qualitative Information Based on DEA Cross-Efficiency and Priority Aggregation for Evaluating Factors Affecting a Resilient City," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 293-316, April.
    20. Yang Zhou & Guangmin Yang, 2022. "A Novel Linguistic Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Group Decision-Making for Sustainable Building Materials Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-29, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:33:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10726-024-09882-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.