IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/grdene/v11y2002i2d10.1023_a1015221710638.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

User Acceptance of E-Collaboration Technology: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model

Author

Listed:
  • Subhasish Dasgupta

    (The George Washington University)

  • Mary Granger

    (The George Washington University)

  • Nina McGarry

    (The George Washington University)

Abstract

This study investigates the applicability of Davis' Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in the user acceptance of electronic collaboration technology. A courseware management tool is used to test the various findings of TAM. Perceived usefulness of the technology emerges as a positive impact on perceived usefulness, and usefulness, in turn, has a negative relationship with system usage. Additionally, certain aspects of system usage influenced student performance in the course. Prior use of the system also affected system use.

Suggested Citation

  • Subhasish Dasgupta & Mary Granger & Nina McGarry, 2002. "User Acceptance of E-Collaboration Technology: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 87-100, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:11:y:2002:i:2:d:10.1023_a:1015221710638
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1015221710638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1015221710638
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1015221710638?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pinsonneault, Alain & Kraemer, Kenneth L., 1990. "The effects of electronic meetings on group processes and outcomes: An assessment of the empirical research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 143-161, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Escobar-Rodríguez, Tomás & Bartual-Sopena, Lourdes, 2015. "Impact of cultural factors on attitude toward using ERP systems in public hospitals," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 127-137.
    2. Ofir Turel & Catherine E. Connelly, 2012. "Team Spirit: The Influence of Psychological Collectivism on the Usage of E-Collaboration Tools," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 703-725, September.
    3. Takayuki Ito & Rafik Hadfi & Shota Suzuki, 2022. "An Agent that Facilitates Crowd Discussion," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 621-647, June.
    4. Denolf, Janne.M. & Wognum, Nel P.M. & Trienekens, Jacques H. & van der Vorst, Jack G.A.J. & Omta, S.W.F. (Onno), 2012. "Towards a Supply-Chain Instrument to Monitor an Information Technology Implementation," 2012 International European Forum, February 13-17, 2012, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 144968, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    5. Akca Yasar & Gokhan Ozer, 2016. "Determination the Factors that Affect the Use of Enterprise Resource Planning Information System through Technology Acceptance Model," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(10), pages 1-91, September.
    6. Emete Toros & Gulsum Asiksoy & Lütfi Sürücü, 2024. "Refreshment students’ perceived usefulness and attitudes towards using technology: a moderated mediation model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Trkman, Marina & Trkman, Peter, 2014. "Actors’ misaligned interests to explain the low impact of an information system – A case study," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 296-307.
    8. Sanjiv D. Vaidya & Priya Seetharaman, 2011. "Explaining Sophistication in Collaborative Technology Use: A Context—Technology Fit Perspective," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 185-213, March.
    9. Sohaib S. Hassan & Konrad Meisner & Kevin Krause & Levan Bzhalava & Petra Moog, 2024. "Is digitalization a source of innovation? Exploring the role of digital diffusion in SME innovation performance," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 1469-1491, April.
    10. Hou, Chung-Kuang, 2012. "Examining the effect of user satisfaction on system usage and individual performance with business intelligence systems: An empirical study of Taiwan's electronics industry," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 560-573.
    11. Ofir Turel & Yufei Yuan, 2007. "User Acceptance of Web-Based Negotiation Support Systems: The Role of Perceived Intention of the Negotiating Partner to Negotiate Online," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 451-468, September.
    12. Marie-E. Godefroid & Vincent Borghoff & Ralf Plattfaut & Björn Niehaves, 2024. "Teleworking antecedents: an exploration into availability bias as an impediment," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 247-284, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Midgley, Gerald & Cavana, Robert Y. & Brocklesby, John & Foote, Jeff L. & Wood, David R.R. & Ahuriri-Driscoll, Annabel, 2013. "Towards a new framework for evaluating systemic problem structuring methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(1), pages 143-154.
    2. Tavana, M. & Kennedy, D. T. & Joglekar, P., 1996. "A group decision support framework for consensus ranking of technical manager candidates," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 523-538, October.
    3. Salo, Ahti A., 1995. "Interactive decision aiding for group decision support," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 134-149, July.
    4. Mahmoud Migdadi & Mohammed Khair Abu Zaid & Omar S. Hujran, 2012. "The Impact of Collaborative Technology on Organisational Performance Through Intranet Use Orientations," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(01), pages 1-14.
    5. Karim Gassemi, 2019. "Collective Strategy Formulation: An Experimental Research Assessing the Positive Impact of Group Decision Support System on Work Group," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 9(5), pages 150-157.
    6. J. Teich & H. Wallenius & J. Wallenius, 1998. "World Wide Web Technology in Support of Negotiation and Communication," Working Papers ir98018, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    7. Rod Jarman, 2005. "When Success Isn’t Everything – Case Studies of Two Virtual Teams," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 333-354, July.
    8. Thissen, Wil A. H. & Twaalfhoven, Patricia G. J., 2001. "Towards a conceptual structure for evaluating policy analytic activities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(3), pages 627-649, March.
    9. Joel Harmon, 1998. "Electronic Meetings and Intense Group Conflict: Effects of a Policy-Modeling Performance Support System and an Audio Communication Support System on Satisfaction and Agreement," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 131-153, March.
    10. Alain Pinsonneault & Henri Barki & R. Brent Gallupe & Norberto Hoppen, 1999. "Electronic Brainstorming: The Illusion of Productivity," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 110-133, June.
    11. Sanjiv D. Vaidya & Priya Seetharaman, 2011. "Explaining Sophistication in Collaborative Technology Use: A Context—Technology Fit Perspective," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 185-213, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:11:y:2002:i:2:d:10.1023_a:1015221710638. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.