IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/finsto/v24y2020i4d10.1007_s00780-020-00437-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extended weak convergence and utility maximisation with proportional transaction costs

Author

Listed:
  • Erhan Bayraktar

    (University of Michigan)

  • Leonid Dolinskyi

    (The University of the State Fiscal Service)

  • Yan Dolinsky

    (Hebrew University)

Abstract

In this paper, we study utility maximisation with proportional transaction costs. Assuming extended weak convergence of the underlying processes, we prove the convergence of the time-0 values of the corresponding utility maximisation problems. Moreover, we establish a limit theorem for the optimal trading strategies. The proofs are based on the extended weak convergence theory developed in Aldous (Weak Convergence of Stochastic Processes for Processes Viewed in the Strasbourg Manner, 1981) and on the Meyer–Zheng topology introduced in Meyer and Zheng (Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat. 20:353–372, 1984).

Suggested Citation

  • Erhan Bayraktar & Leonid Dolinskyi & Yan Dolinsky, 2020. "Extended weak convergence and utility maximisation with proportional transaction costs," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1013-1034, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:finsto:v:24:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s00780-020-00437-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s00780-020-00437-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00780-020-00437-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00780-020-00437-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/9300 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Jakša Cvitanić & Ioannis Karatzas, 1996. "Hedging And Portfolio Optimization Under Transaction Costs: A Martingale Approach12," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(2), pages 133-165, April.
    3. Julio Backhoff-Veraguas & Daniel Bartl & Mathias Beiglböck & Manu Eder, 2020. "Adapted Wasserstein distances and stability in mathematical finance," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 601-632, July.
    4. Bruno Bouchard, 2002. "Utility maximization on the real line under proportional transaction costs," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 495-516.
    5. Griselda Deelstra & Huyên Pham & Nizar Touzi, 2001. "Dual formulation of the utility maximisation problem under transaction costs," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/7596, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    6. repec:dau:papers:123456789/1532 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Julio Backhoff-Veraguas & Daniel Bartl & Mathias Beiglbock & Manu Eder, 2019. "Adapted Wasserstein Distances and Stability in Mathematical Finance," Papers 1901.07450, arXiv.org, revised May 2020.
    8. M. H. A. Davis & A. R. Norman, 1990. "Portfolio Selection with Transaction Costs," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 676-713, November.
    9. Dumas, Bernard & Luciano, Elisa, 1991. "An Exact Solution to a Dynamic Portfolio Choice Problem under Transactions Costs," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 46(2), pages 577-595, June.
    10. Erhan Bayraktar & Xiang Yu, 2018. "On the market viability under proportional transaction costs," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 800-838, July.
    11. Huy N. Chau & Mikl'os R'asonyi, 2016. "Skorohod's representation theorem and optimal strategies for markets with frictions," Papers 1606.07311, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2017.
    12. Czichowsky, Christoph & Schachermayer, Walter, 2016. "Duality theory for portfolio optimisation under transaction costs," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 63362, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Michael Taksar & Michael J. Klass & David Assaf, 1988. "A Diffusion Model for Optimal Portfolio Selection in the Presence of Brokerage Fees," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 277-294, May.
    14. J. Kallsen & J. Muhle-Karbe, 2010. "On using shadow prices in portfolio optimization with transaction costs," Papers 1010.4989, arXiv.org.
    15. Paolo Guasoni & Emmanuel Lépinette & Miklós Rásonyi, 2012. "The fundamental theorem of asset pricing under transaction costs," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 741-777, October.
    16. Erhan Bayraktar & Yan Dolinsky & Jia Guo, 2018. "Continuity of Utility Maximization under Weak Convergence," Papers 1811.01420, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2020.
    17. Giuseppe Benedetti & Luciano Campi, 2011. "Multivariate utility maximization with proportional transaction costs and random endowment," Working Papers hal-00586377, HAL.
    18. Magill, Michael J. P. & Constantinides, George M., 1976. "Portfolio selection with transactions costs," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 245-263, October.
    19. Luciano Campi & Mark Owen, 2011. "Multivariate utility maximization with proportional transaction costs," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 461-499, September.
    20. Stefan Gerhold & Paolo Guasoni & Johannes Muhle-Karbe & Walter Schachermayer, 2014. "Transaction costs, trading volume, and the liquidity premium," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 1-37, January.
    21. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2318 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David M. Kreps & Walter Schachermayer, 2020. "Convergence of optimal expected utility for a sequence of discrete‐time markets," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1205-1228, October.
    2. Erhan Bayraktar & Christoph Czichowsky & Leonid Dolinskyi & Yan Dolinsky, 2021. "A Note on Utility Maximization with Proportional Transaction Costs and Stability of Optimal Portfolios," Papers 2107.01568, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.
    3. Friedrich Hubalek & Walter Schachermayer, 2021. "Convergence of optimal expected utility for a sequence of binomial models," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1315-1331, October.
    4. Muqiao Huang & Ruodu Wang, 2024. "Coherent risk measures and uniform integrability," Papers 2404.03783, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    5. Tae Ung Gang & Jin Hyuk Choi, 2024. "Unified Asymptotics For Investment Under Illiquidity: Transaction Costs And Search Frictions," Papers 2407.13547, arXiv.org.
    6. Jin Hyuk Choi & Tae Ung Gang, 2021. "Optimal investment in illiquid market with search frictions and transaction costs," Papers 2101.09936, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yiqing Lin & Junjian Yang, 2016. "Utility maximization problem with random endowment and transaction costs: when wealth may become negative," Papers 1604.08224, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2016.
    2. Christoph Czichowsky & Walter Schachermayer, 2015. "Portfolio optimisation beyond semimartingales: shadow prices and fractional Brownian motion," Papers 1505.02416, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2016.
    3. Czichowsky, Christoph & Schachermayer, Walter, 2017. "Portfolio optimisation beyond semimartingales: shadowprices and fractional Brownian motion," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 67689, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Christoph Czichowsky & R'emi Peyre & Walter Schachermayer & Junjian Yang, 2016. "Shadow prices, fractional Brownian motion, and portfolio optimisation under transaction costs," Papers 1608.01415, arXiv.org.
    5. Christoph Czichowsky & Rémi Peyre & Walter Schachermayer & Junjian Yang, 2018. "Shadow prices, fractional Brownian motion, and portfolio optimisation under transaction costs," Post-Print hal-02373296, HAL.
    6. Christoph Czichowsky & Walter Schachermayer, 2014. "Duality Theory for Portfolio Optimisation under Transaction Costs," Papers 1408.5989, arXiv.org.
    7. Albert Altarovici & Max Reppen & H. Mete Soner, 2016. "Optimal Consumption and Investment with Fixed and Proportional Transaction Costs," Papers 1610.03958, arXiv.org.
    8. Christoph Czichowsky & Rémi Peyre & Walter Schachermayer & Junjian Yang, 2018. "Shadow prices, fractional Brownian motion, and portfolio optimisation under transaction costs," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 161-180, January.
    9. Lingqi Gu & Yiqing Lin & Junjian Yang, 2017. "Utility maximization problem under transaction costs: optimal dual processes and stability," Papers 1710.04363, arXiv.org.
    10. Jan Kallsen & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2013. "The General Structure of Optimal Investment and Consumption with Small Transaction Costs," Papers 1303.3148, arXiv.org, revised May 2015.
    11. Czichowsky, Christoph Johannes & Peyre, Rémi & Schachermayer, Walter & Yang, Junjian, 2018. "Shadow prices, fractional Brownian motion, and portfolio optimisation under transaction costs," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 85230, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Czichowsky, Christoph & Schachermayer, Walter, 2016. "Duality theory for portfolio optimisation under transaction costs," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 63362, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Christian Bayer & Bezirgen Veliyev, 2014. "Utility Maximization In A Binomial Model With Transaction Costs: A Duality Approach Based On The Shadow Price Process," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(04), pages 1-27.
    14. Giuseppe Benedetti & Luciano Campi & Jan Kallsen & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2013. "On the existence of shadow prices," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 801-818, October.
    15. Johannes Muhle-Karbe & Max Reppen & H. Mete Soner, 2016. "A Primer on Portfolio Choice with Small Transaction Costs," Papers 1612.01302, arXiv.org, revised May 2017.
    16. Stefan Gerhold & Johannes Muhle-Karbe & Walter Schachermayer, 2010. "The dual optimizer for the growth-optimal portfolio under transaction costs," Papers 1005.5105, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2010.
    17. Giuseppe Benedetti & Luciano Campi & Jan Kallsen & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2011. "On the existence of shadow prices," Working Papers hal-00645980, HAL.
    18. Martin Herdegen & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2018. "Stability of Radner equilibria with respect to small frictions," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 443-502, April.
    19. Jörn Sass & Manfred Schäl, 2014. "Numeraire portfolios and utility-based price systems under proportional transaction costs," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 37(2), pages 195-234, October.
    20. Adrian Buss & Bernard Dumas, 2019. "The Dynamic Properties of Financial‐Market Equilibrium with Trading Fees," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 74(2), pages 795-844, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Utility maximisation; Proportional transaction costs; Extended weak convergence; Meyer–Zheng topology;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • C65 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Miscellaneous Mathematical Tools

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:finsto:v:24:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s00780-020-00437-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.