IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/finsto/v13y2009i3p351-379.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adjoint-based Monte Carlo calibration of financial market models

Author

Listed:
  • C. Kaebe
  • J. Maruhn
  • E. Sachs

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • C. Kaebe & J. Maruhn & E. Sachs, 2009. "Adjoint-based Monte Carlo calibration of financial market models," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 351-379, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:finsto:v:13:y:2009:i:3:p:351-379
    DOI: 10.1007/s00780-009-0097-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00780-009-0097-9
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00780-009-0097-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger Lord & Remmert Koekkoek & Dick Van Dijk, 2010. "A comparison of biased simulation schemes for stochastic volatility models," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 177-194.
    2. Hull, John C & White, Alan D, 1987. "The Pricing of Options on Assets with Stochastic Volatilities," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 42(2), pages 281-300, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cristian Homescu, 2011. "Adjoints and Automatic (Algorithmic) Differentiation in Computational Finance," Papers 1107.1831, arXiv.org.
    2. Eichler Andreas & Leobacher Gunther & Zellinger Heidrun, 2011. "Calibration of financial models using quasi-Monte Carlo," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 17(2), pages 99-131, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bara Kim & In-Suk Wee, 2014. "Pricing of geometric Asian options under Heston's stochastic volatility model," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(10), pages 1795-1809, October.
    2. Cui, Zhenyu & Kirkby, J. Lars & Nguyen, Duy, 2021. "Efficient simulation of generalized SABR and stochastic local volatility models based on Markov chain approximations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 1046-1062.
    3. El-Khatib, Youssef & Goutte, Stephane & Makumbe, Zororo S. & Vives, Josep, 2023. "A hybrid stochastic volatility model in a Lévy market," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 220-235.
    4. Benjamin Jourdain & Mohamed Sbai, 2013. "High order discretization schemes for stochastic volatility models," Post-Print hal-00409861, HAL.
    5. Calvet, Laurent E. & Fearnley, Marcus & Fisher, Adlai J. & Leippold, Markus, 2015. "What is beneath the surface? Option pricing with multifrequency latent states," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 187(2), pages 498-511.
    6. Yijuan Liang & Xiuchuan Xu, 2019. "Variance and Dimension Reduction Monte Carlo Method for Pricing European Multi-Asset Options with Stochastic Volatilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, February.
    7. Rodrigue Oeuvray & Pascal Junod, 2013. "On time scaling of semivariance in a jump-diffusion process," Papers 1311.1122, arXiv.org.
    8. Sergey Nasekin & Wolfgang Karl Hardle, 2020. "Model-driven statistical arbitrage on LETF option markets," Papers 2009.09713, arXiv.org.
    9. F. Antonelli & A. Ramponi & S. Scarlatti, 2010. "Exchange option pricing under stochastic volatility: a correlation expansion," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 45-73, April.
    10. Cui, Zhenyu & Lars Kirkby, J. & Nguyen, Duy, 2017. "A general framework for discretely sampled realized variance derivatives in stochastic volatility models with jumps," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(1), pages 381-400.
    11. Bégin Jean-François & Bédard Mylène & Gaillardetz Patrice, 2015. "Simulating from the Heston model: A gamma approximation scheme," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 21(3), pages 205-231, September.
    12. Andrei Cozma & Christoph Reisinger, 2015. "A mixed Monte Carlo and PDE variance reduction method for foreign exchange options under the Heston-CIR model," Papers 1509.01479, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2016.
    13. Mariano González-Sánchez & Eva M. Ibáñez Jiménez & Ana I. Segovia San Juan, 2022. "Market and model risks: a feasible joint estimate methodology," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(3), pages 187-213, September.
    14. Medvedev, Alexey & Scaillet, Olivier, 2010. "Pricing American options under stochastic volatility and stochastic interest rates," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 145-159, October.
    15. Amit Sinha, 2024. "Daily and Weekly Geometric Brownian Motion Stock Index Forecasts," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-22, September.
    16. Marcos Escobar-Anel & Weili Fan, 2023. "The SEV-SV Model—Applications in Portfolio Optimization," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-34, January.
    17. Peter Carr & Liuren Wu, 2014. "Static Hedging of Standard Options," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 3-46.
    18. Athanasia Gavala & Nikolay Gospodinov & Deming Jiang, 2006. "Forecasting volatility," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(6), pages 381-400.
    19. Asai, Manabu & McAleer, Michael, 2015. "Leverage and feedback effects on multifactor Wishart stochastic volatility for option pricing," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 187(2), pages 436-446.
    20. Söderlind, Paul, 2009. "The C-CAPM without ex post data," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 721-729, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Adjoint equation; Monte Carlo calibration; Multi-layer method; 65C05; 65K05; 90C30; 90C90; 91B28; C61; C63;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:finsto:v:13:y:2009:i:3:p:351-379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.