IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envsyd/v45y2025i1d10.1007_s10669-024-09992-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CoCoSort: a multiple criteria sorting method for managing the protection of marine resources

Author

Listed:
  • Jason Tuang-tuang

    (Palompon Institute of Technology
    Instituto Politécnico Nacional 195)

  • Samantha Shane Evangelista

    (Cebu Technological University)

  • Eliza Espinosa

    (Visayas State University)

  • Lanndon Ocampo

    (Cebu Technological University
    University of Portsmouth)

Abstract

Decentralized management of marine resources by local governments yields an enhanced opportunity to protect, restore, and create sustainable marine biodiversity in the provision of ecosystem services. However, due to the complexities associated with designing a level of protection for a specific marine resource, local stakeholders may find the process challenging, which may have adverse effects resulting from delayed conservation initiatives. Thus, under various criteria, a systematic approach that assigns a level of protection to marine resources is critical in managing these resources. Despite this criticality, such an agenda gains limited attention from the domain literature. This work advances this gap by proposing a multiple criteria sorting (MCS) method that comprehensively assigns marine resources to a pre-defined set of protection categories under the evaluation of several criteria. It utilizes (1) the entropy method in obtaining the priority weights of the identified criteria associated with evaluating the reef status of marine sites and (2) an extension of the combined compromise solution sorting method, termed CoCoSort, in evaluating marine sites to a pre-determined set of categories (i.e., Category 1, Category 2, Category 3), arranged in increasing order of protection. With the available indicators in the literature, the proposed CoCoSort was implemented in an actual case study of eight marine sites in an eastern Philippine municipality. Findings reveal that feather stars density, giant clams density, and butterfly abundance comprise the top priority criteria in evaluating the case sites. On the other hand, five identified sites are found to be under the maximum protection category, while three sites should be given moderate protection. Both sensitivity and comparative analyses show the efficacy of the proposed CoCoSort. The insights would help local governments manage the biodiversity protection of their marine environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Jason Tuang-tuang & Samantha Shane Evangelista & Eliza Espinosa & Lanndon Ocampo, 2025. "CoCoSort: a multiple criteria sorting method for managing the protection of marine resources," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 1-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:45:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10669-024-09992-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10669-024-09992-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10669-024-09992-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10669-024-09992-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vicent Penadés-Plà & Tatiana García-Segura & José V. Martí & Víctor Yepes, 2016. "A Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods Applied to the Sustainable Bridge Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-21, December.
    2. David A. Gill & Michael B. Mascia & Gabby N. Ahmadia & Louise Glew & Sarah E. Lester & Megan Barnes & Ian Craigie & Emily S. Darling & Christopher M. Free & Jonas Geldmann & Susie Holst & Olaf P. Jens, 2017. "Capacity shortfalls hinder the performance of marine protected areas globally," Nature, Nature, vol. 543(7647), pages 665-669, March.
    3. Bennett, Nathan James & Dearden, Philip, 2014. "Why local people do not support conservation: Community perceptions of marine protected area livelihood impacts, governance and management in Thailand," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 107-116.
    4. Kafferine Yamagishi & Lanndon Ocampo, 2022. "Utilizing TOPSIS-Sort for sorting tourist sites for perceived COVID-19 exposure," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 168-178, January.
    5. D. Mouillot & V. Parravicini & D. R. Bellwood & F. Leprieur & D. Huang & P. F. Cowman & C. Albouy & T. P. Hughes & W. Thuiller & F. Guilhaumon, 2016. "Global marine protected areas do not secure the evolutionary history of tropical corals and fishes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, April.
    6. Togridou, Anatoli & Hovardas, Tasos & Pantis, John D., 2006. "Determinants of visitors' willingness to pay for the National Marine Park of Zakynthos, Greece," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 308-319, November.
    7. Morteza Yazdani & Pascale Zaraté & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Zenonas Turskis, 2019. "A Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems," Post-Print hal-02879091, HAL.
    8. Louise S L Teh & Lydia C L Teh & U Rashid Sumaila, 2013. "A Global Estimate of the Number of Coral Reef Fishers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-10, June.
    9. Asma Fahim & Qingmei Tan & Bushra Naz & Qurat ul Ain & Sibghat Ullah Bazai, 2021. "Sustainable Higher Education Reform Quality Assessment Using SWOT Analysis with Integration of AHP and Entropy Models: A Case Study of Morocco," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    10. R. Q. Malik & A. A. Zaidan & B. B. Zaidan & K. N. Ramli & O. S. Albahri & Z. H. Kareem & H. A. Ameen & S. S. Garfan & A. Mohammed & R. A. Zaidan & M. M. Salih, 2022. "Novel Roadside Unit Positioning Framework in the Context of the Vehicle-to-Infrastructure Communication System Based on AHP — Entropy for Weighting and Borda — VIKOR for Uniform Ranking," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(04), pages 1233-1266, July.
    11. Opricovic, Serafim & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2004. "Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(2), pages 445-455, July.
    12. Juan Carlos Ortiz & Yves-Marie Bozec & Nicholas H. Wolff & Christopher Doropoulos & Peter J. Mumby, 2014. "Global disparity in the ecological benefits of reducing carbon emissions for coral reefs," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(12), pages 1090-1094, December.
    13. Zhiguo Wang & Junbin Wang & Guoping Zhang & Zhixiong Wang, 2021. "Evaluation of Agricultural Extension Service for Sustainable Agricultural Development Using a Hybrid Entropy and TOPSIS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thi Kim Lien Nguyen & Hoang Nga Le & Bach Dang Ha & Quoc Ngu Nguyen & Van Phi Pham & Van Dan Dinh, 2024. "Evaluating the Business Performance of Seaport Enterprises in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Seyed Hossein Razavi Hajiagha & Jalil Heidary-Dahooie & Ieva Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė & Kannan Govindan, 2022. "A new dynamic multi-attribute decision making method based on Markov chain and linear assignment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(1), pages 159-191, August.
    3. David Mouillot & Laure Velez & Camille Albouy & Nicolas Casajus & Joachim Claudet & Vincent Delbar & Rodolphe Devillers & Tom B. Letessier & Nicolas Loiseau & Stéphanie Manel & Laura Mannocci & Jessic, 2024. "The socioeconomic and environmental niche of protected areas reveals global conservation gaps and opportunities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Miguel Ortíz-Barrios & Natalia Jaramillo-Rueda & Muhammet Gul & Melih Yucesan & Genett Jiménez-Delgado & Juan-José Alfaro-Saíz, 2023. "A Fuzzy Hybrid MCDM Approach for Assessing the Emergency Department Performance during the COVID-19 Outbreak," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-39, March.
    5. Venetia Alexa Hargreaves-Allen & Susana Mourato & Eleanor Jane Milner-Gulland, 2017. "Drivers of coral reef marine protected area performance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, June.
    6. Dariusz Kacprzak, 2024. "A new extension of the EDAS method in a fuzzy environment for group decision-making," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 51(3), pages 263-277, September.
    7. Rasheed, A. Rifaee, 2020. "Marine protected areas and human well-being – A systematic review and recommendations," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    8. Haolun Wang, 2022. "Sustainable Circular Supplier Selection in the Power Battery Industry Using a Linguistic T-Spherical Fuzzy MAGDM Model Based on the Improved ARAS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-26, June.
    9. Ustaoglu, E. & Sisman, S. & Aydınoglu, A.C., 2021. "Determining agricultural suitable land in peri-urban geography using GIS and Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) techniques," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 455(C).
    10. Jeremy Horowitz & Robert L. Pressey & Georgina G. Gurney & Amelia S. Wenger & Kristina A. Pahang, 2018. "Investigating Stakeholder Perceptions of Fish Decline: Making Sense of Multiple Mental Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-26, April.
    11. Daniela Marzo & Iacopo Cavallini & Luisa Scaccia & Paolo Guidetti & Antonio Di Franco & Antonio Calò & Federico Niccolini, 2023. "Drivers of Small-Scale Fishers’ Acceptability across Mediterranean Marine Protected Areas at Different Stages of Establishment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, June.
    12. Yekani Motlagh, Elgar & Hajjarian, Marzieh & Hossein Zadeh, Omid & Alijanpour, Ahmad, 2020. "The difference of expert opinion on the forest-based ecotourism development in developed countries and Iran," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    13. Morteza Yazdani & Dragan Pamucar & Prasenjit Chatterjee & Ali Ebadi Torkayesh, 2022. "“A multi-tier sustainable food supplier selection model under uncertainty”," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 116-145, June.
    14. Yi Peng, 2015. "Regional earthquake vulnerability assessment using a combination of MCDM methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 234(1), pages 95-110, November.
    15. Zheng, Guozhong & Wang, Xiao, 2020. "The comprehensive evaluation of renewable energy system schemes in tourist resorts based on VIKOR method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    16. Milad Zamanifar & Seyed Mohammad Seyedhoseyni, 2017. "Recovery planning model for roadways network after natural hazards," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(2), pages 699-716, June.
    17. Pedro Ponce & Citlaly Pérez & Aminah Robinson Fayek & Arturo Molina, 2022. "Solar Energy Implementation in Manufacturing Industry Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Fuzzy TOPSIS and S4 Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-19, November.
    18. Wenyao Niu & Yuan Rong & Liying Yu & Lu Huang, 2022. "A Novel Hybrid Group Decision Making Approach Based on EDAS and Regret Theory under a Fermatean Cubic Fuzzy Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-30, August.
    19. Birdir, Sevda & Ünal, Özlem & Birdir, Kemal & Williams, Allan T., 2013. "Willingness to pay as an economic instrument for coastal tourism management: Cases from Mersin, Turkey," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 279-283.
    20. Hisham Alidrisi, 2021. "An Innovative Job Evaluation Approach Using the VIKOR Algorithm," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:45:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10669-024-09992-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.