IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v455y2021ics0304380021001721.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining agricultural suitable land in peri-urban geography using GIS and Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Ustaoglu, E.
  • Sisman, S.
  • Aydınoglu, A.C.

Abstract

Land-use suitability analysis is of significance for the planning and management of cities. The main objective of this study was to develop a spatial model for land suitability assessment for peri-urban agricultural development with the use of geographic information systems (GIS) integrated with Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) techniques. Physical attributes, land use, natural resources, accessibility, geology and soil properties were recognised as the key factors influencing land suitability for peri-urban agriculture in the study area. The study follows an integrated approach for the suitability assessment of agricultural development in Pendik District of Istanbul (Turkey) through integrating fuzzy logic model, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) methods. Suitability classification of land was done in GIS by using the specified fuzzy membership functions. The weights of the main criteria and their sub-criteria were determined through the AHP method. Eight different zones were ranked according to agricultural development priority by the TOPSIS method. The area classified as suitable amounts to 27% of the total area with 0.07% classified as unsuitable. The highly suitable areas are mainly located in the north where there are villages specialised in agricultural production. The prioritisation of the suitable agricultural areas would assist in land use planning and urban management.

Suggested Citation

  • Ustaoglu, E. & Sisman, S. & Aydınoglu, A.C., 2021. "Determining agricultural suitable land in peri-urban geography using GIS and Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) techniques," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 455(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:455:y:2021:i:c:s0304380021001721
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109610
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380021001721
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109610?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Komossa, Franziska & van der Zanden, Emma H. & Verburg, Peter H., 2019. "Characterizing outdoor recreation user groups: A typology of peri-urban recreationists in the Kromme Rijn area, the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 246-258.
    2. Zezza, Alberto & Tasciotti, Luca, 2010. "Urban agriculture, poverty, and food security: Empirical evidence from a sample of developing countries," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 265-273, August.
    3. Prabakaran, G. & Vaithiyanathan, D. & Ganesan, Madhavi, 2021. "FPGA based effective agriculture productivity prediction system using fuzzy support vector machine," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1-16.
    4. Hanna Karg & Pay Drechsel & Edmund K. Akoto-Danso & Rüdiger Glaser & George Nyarko & Andreas Buerkert, 2016. "Foodsheds and City Region Food Systems in Two West African Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-32, November.
    5. Nolwazi Zanele Khumalo & Melusi Sibanda, 2019. "Does Urban and Peri-Urban Agriculture Contribute to Household Food Security? An Assessment of the Food Security Status of Households in Tongaat, eThekwini Municipality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, February.
    6. Opricovic, Serafim & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2004. "Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(2), pages 445-455, July.
    7. Choudhary, Devendra & Shankar, Ravi, 2012. "An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: A case study from India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 510-521.
    8. E. Gunilla A. Olsson & Eva Kerselaers & Lone Søderkvist Kristensen & Jørgen Primdahl & Elke Rogge & Anders Wästfelt, 2016. "Peri-Urban Food Production and Its Relation to Urban Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Gutman, Pablo, 2007. "Ecosystem services: Foundations for a new rural-urban compact," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(3-4), pages 383-387, May.
    10. Marando, Federica & Salvatori, Elisabetta & Sebastiani, Alessandro & Fusaro, Lina & Manes, Fausto, 2019. "Regulating Ecosystem Services and Green Infrastructure: assessment of Urban Heat Island effect mitigation in the municipality of Rome, Italy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 392(C), pages 92-102.
    11. Sevgi Gormus & Serhat Cengiz & Sermin Tagil, 2019. "Proposing an agricultural belt to protect a city’s semi-rural characteristics: The example of Bartın, Turkey," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(5), pages 557-573, July.
    12. Spyra, Marcin & La Rosa, Daniele & Zasada, Ingo & Sylla, Marta & Shkaruba, Anton, 2020. "Governance of ecosystem services trade-offs in peri-urban landscapes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    13. Walter Musakwa, 2018. "Identifying land suitable for agricultural land reform using GIS-MCDA in South Africa," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 2281-2299, October.
    14. Ustaoglu, E. & Aydınoglu, A.C., 2020. "Suitability evaluation of urban construction land in Pendik district of Istanbul, Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    15. Bharat Bhushan Vashisht & Bijesh Maharjan & Sandeep Sharma & Samanpreet Kaur, 2020. "Soil Quality and Its Potential Indicators under Different Land Use Systems in the Shivaliks of Indian Punjab," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, April.
    16. Timuçin Everest, 2021. "Suitable site selection for pistachio (Pistacia vera) by using GIS and multi-criteria decision analyses (a case study in Turkey)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 7686-7705, May.
    17. Zhiguo Wang & Junbin Wang & Guoping Zhang & Zhixiong Wang, 2021. "Evaluation of Agricultural Extension Service for Sustainable Agricultural Development Using a Hybrid Entropy and TOPSIS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, January.
    18. Yoram Wind & Thomas L. Saaty, 1980. "Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(7), pages 641-658, July.
    19. Kazak, Jan & van Hoof, Joost & Szewranski, Szymon, 2017. "Challenges in the wind turbines location process in Central Europe – The use of spatial decision support systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 425-433.
    20. Gomes, Eduardo & Abrantes, Patrícia & Banos, Arnaud & Rocha, Jorge, 2019. "Modelling future land use scenarios based on farmers’ intentions and a cellular automata approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 142-154.
    21. Ayambire, Raphael Anammasiya & Amponsah, Owusu & Peprah, Charles & Takyi, Stephen Appiah, 2019. "A review of practices for sustaining urban and peri-urban agriculture: Implications for land use planning in rapidly urbanising Ghanaian cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 260-277.
    22. Bakhtiar Feizizadeh & Thomas Blaschke, 2013. "Land suitability analysis for Tabriz County, Iran: a multi-criteria evaluation approach using GIS," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1), pages 1-23, January.
    23. Hossein Yousefi & Hamed Hafeznia & Amin Yousefi-Sahzabi, 2018. "Spatial Site Selection for Solar Power Plants Using a GIS-Based Boolean-Fuzzy Logic Model: A Case Study of Markazi Province, Iran," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, June.
    24. Javalgi, Rajshekhar G. & Armacost, Robert L. & Hosseini, Jamshid C., 1989. "Using the analytic hierarchy process for bank management: Analysis of consumer bank selection decisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 33-49, August.
    25. B. G. J. S. Sonneveld & M. D. Houessou & G. J. M. van den Boom & A. Aoudji, 2021. "Where Do I Allocate My Urban Allotment Gardens? Development of a Site Selection Tool for Three Cities in Benin," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. José Vladimir Morales-Ruano & Maximino Reyes-Umaña & Francisco Rubén Sandoval-Vázquez & Hilda Janet Arellano-Wences & Justiniano González-González & Columba Rodríguez-Alviso, 2022. "Flood Susceptibility in the Lower Course of the Coyuca River, Mexico: A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Jiang, Xue & Li, Bingxin & Zhao, Hongyu & Zhang, Qiqi & Song, Xiaoya & Zhang, Haoran, 2022. "Examining the spatial simulation and land-use reorganisation mechanism of agricultural suburban settlements using a cellular-automata and agent-based model: Six settlements in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    3. Yanqi Zhao & Yue Zhang & Ying Yang & Fan Li & Rongkun Dai & Jianlin Li & Mingshi Wang & Zhenhua Li, 2023. "The Impact of Land Use Structure Change on Utilization Performance in Henan Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Yining Ma & Suri Guga & Jie Xu & Yulin Su & Xingpeng Liu & Zhijun Tong & Jiquan Zhang, 2022. "Agricultural Vulnerability Assessment of High-Temperature Disaster in Shaanxi Province of China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Xufeng Cui & Tingting Zhou & Xinxing Xiong & Jiaqi Xiong & Jing Zhang & Yuehua Jiang, 2022. "Farmland Suitability Evaluation Oriented by Non-Agriculturalization Sensitivity: A Case Study of Hubei Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Mohamed M. Elsharkawy & Abd El Aziz S. Sheta & Paola D’Antonio & Mohammed S. Abdelwahed & Antonio Scopa, 2022. "Tool for the Establishment of Agro-Management Zones Using GIS Techniques for Precision Farming in Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-26, April.
    7. Roxana Lebuy & Diana Mancilla-Ruiz & Hermann Manríquez & Francisco De la Barrera, 2022. "Degraded Landscapes in Hillside Systems with Agricultural Use: An Integrated Analysis to Establish Restoration Opportunities in Central Chile," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Rabia Bovkir & Eda Ustaoglu & Arif Cagdas Aydinoglu, 2023. "Assessment of Urban Quality of Life Index at Local Scale with Different Weighting Approaches," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 165(2), pages 655-678, January.
    9. Timuçin Everest & Hakan Koparan & Ali Sungur & Hasan Özcan, 2022. "An important tool against combat climate change: Land suitability assessment for canola (a case study: Çanakkale, NW Turkey)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 13137-13172, November.
    10. Oleksiy Opryshko & Natalia Pasichnyk & Nikolay Kiktev & Alla Dudnyk & Taras Hutsol & Krzysztof Mudryk & Piotr Herbut & Piotr Łyszczarz & Valentyna Kukharets, 2024. "European Green Deal: Satellite Monitoring in the Implementation of the Concept of Agricultural Development in an Urbanized Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, March.
    11. Tung Gia Pham & Chau Thi Minh Tran & Hai Thi Nguyen & Ha Ngan Trinh & Ngoc Bich Nguyen & Ha Khoa Ngoc Nguyen & Tan Trong Tran & Huy Dinh Le & Quy Ngoc Phuong Le, 2022. "Land Evaluation for Acacia ( Acacia mangium × Acacia auriculiformis ) Plantations in the Mountainous Regions of Central Vietnam," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-27, December.
    12. Mevlut Uyan & Jarosław Janus & Ela Ertunç, 2023. "Land Use Suitability Model for Grapevine ( Vitis vinifera L.) Cultivation Using the Best Worst Method: A Case Study from Ankara/Türkiye," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, August.
    13. Zhongwei Jing & Peng Chen, 2024. "Research on the Construction of a Composite Humanistic Forest Ecological Corridor in the Main Urban Area of Daqing City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-20, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Enrico Gottero & Claudia Cassatella & Federica Larcher, 2021. "Planning Peri-Urban Open Spaces: Methods and Tools for Interpretation and Classification," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Alphan, Hakan, 2024. "Incorporating visibility information into multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) for wind turbine deployment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 353(PB).
    3. Rabia Bovkir & Eda Ustaoglu & Arif Cagdas Aydinoglu, 2023. "Assessment of Urban Quality of Life Index at Local Scale with Different Weighting Approaches," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 165(2), pages 655-678, January.
    4. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Wu, Jiuxing & Liang, Fachao & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Lai, Ren-Ji & Hsieh, Jing-Chzi & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "An evaluation framework for developing green infrastructure by using a new hybrid multiple attribute decision-making model for promoting environmental sustainability," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    5. Chamoli, Sunil, 2015. "Hybrid FAHP (fuzzy analytical hierarchy process)-FTOPSIS (fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity of an ideal solution) approach for performance evaluation of the V down perforated baffle r," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 432-442.
    6. Serafim Opricovic, 2009. "A Compromise Solution in Water Resources Planning," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(8), pages 1549-1561, June.
    7. Zheng Yuan & Baohua Wen & Cheng He & Jin Zhou & Zhonghua Zhou & Feng Xu, 2022. "Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis to Rural Spatial Sustainability Evaluation: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-31, May.
    8. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Huang, Xianjin & Fu, Guole & Chen, Jia-Tsong & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "Evaluating the sustainability of urban renewal projects based on a model of hybrid multiple-attribute decision-making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    9. Łatuszyńska Anna, 2014. "Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Using Topsis Method For Interval Data In Research Into The Level Of Information Society Development," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 13(2), pages 63-76, July.
    10. Peyman Mohammady & Amin Amid, 2011. "Integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy VIKOR model for supplier selection in an agile and modular virtual enterprise," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 411-431, December.
    11. Karatas, Mumtaz & Sulukan, Egemen & Karacan, Ilknur, 2018. "Assessment of Turkey's energy management performance via a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 890-912.
    12. Mohamed Hanine & Omar Boutkhoum & Abderrafie El Maknissi & Abdessadek Tikniouine & Tarik Agouti, 2016. "Decision making under uncertainty using PEES–fuzzy AHP–fuzzy TOPSIS methodology for landfill location selection," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 351-367, December.
    13. Chenying Li & Tiantian Zhang & Xi Wang & Zefeng Lian, 2022. "Site Selection of Urban Parks Based on Fuzzy-Analytic Hierarchy Process (F-AHP): A Case Study of Nanjing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-27, October.
    14. J. M. Sánchez-Lozano & F. J. Salmerón-Vera & C. Ros-Casajús, 2020. "Prioritization of Cartagena Coastal Military Batteries to Transform Them into Scientific, Tourist and Cultural Places of Interest: A GIS-MCDM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-16, November.
    15. Hernandez-Perdomo, Elvis A. & Mun, Johnathan & Rocco S., Claudio M., 2017. "Active management in state-owned energy companies: Integrating a real options approach into multicriteria analysis to make companies sustainable," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 487-502.
    16. Timuçin Everest, 2021. "Suitable site selection for pistachio (Pistacia vera) by using GIS and multi-criteria decision analyses (a case study in Turkey)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 7686-7705, May.
    17. Hyung-Suk Kim & Kyu-Won Kim, 2021. "Sustainable Landscapes in the Traditional Korean Residential Environment: Focus on the Joseon Dynasty," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, June.
    18. Yunna Wu & Chao Xie & Chuanbo Xu & Fang Li, 2017. "A Decision Framework for Electric Vehicle Charging Station Site Selection for Residential Communities under an Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment: A Case of Beijing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-25, August.
    19. Zuo, Ting & Wei, Heng, 2019. "Bikeway prioritization to increase bicycle network connectivity and bicycle-transit connection: A multi-criteria decision analysis approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 52-71.
    20. Muhammad Ikram & Qingyu Zhang & Robert Sroufe, 2020. "Developing integrated management systems using an AHP‐Fuzzy VIKOR approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2265-2283, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:455:y:2021:i:c:s0304380021001721. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.