IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envsyd/v38y2018i3d10.1007_s10669-018-9702-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contributions of green infrastructure to enhancing urban resilience

Author

Listed:
  • Chad Staddon

    (University of the West of England)

  • Sarah Ward

    (University of the West of England)

  • Laura Vito

    (University of the West of England)

  • Adriana Zuniga-Teran

    (University of Arizona)

  • Andrea K. Gerlak

    (University of Arizona)

  • Yolandi Schoeman

    (Monash South Africa)

  • Aimee Hart

    (Arcadis)

  • Giles Booth

    (Arcadis)

Abstract

After briefly reviewing key resilience engineering perspectives and summarising some green infrastructure (GI) tools, we present the contributions that GI can make to enhancing urban resilience and maintaining critical system functionality across complex integrated social–ecological and technical systems. We then examine five key challenges for the effective implementation of GI that include (1) standards; (2) regulation; (3) socio-economic factors; (4) financeability; and (5) innovation. We highlight ways in which these challenges are being dealt with around the world, particularly through the use of approaches that are both context appropriate and socially inclusive. Although progress surmounting these challenges has been made, more needs to be done to ensure that GI approaches are inclusive and appropriate and feature equally alongside more traditional ‘grey’ infrastructure in the future of urban resilience planning. This research was undertaken for the Resilience Shift initiative to shift the approach to resilience in practice for critical infrastructure sectors. The programme aims to help practitioners involved in critical infrastructure to make decisions differently, contributing to a safer and better world.

Suggested Citation

  • Chad Staddon & Sarah Ward & Laura Vito & Adriana Zuniga-Teran & Andrea K. Gerlak & Yolandi Schoeman & Aimee Hart & Giles Booth, 2018. "Contributions of green infrastructure to enhancing urban resilience," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 330-338, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:38:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s10669-018-9702-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10669-018-9702-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10669-018-9702-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10669-018-9702-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abhijit Paul & Paul F. Downton & Enoch Okoli & Jit K. Gupta & Mark Tirpak, 2014. "Does adding more lettuce make a hamburger truly green? A metaphor behind the green movement paradigm in designing cities," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 373-377, September.
    2. Xiaoqin Zhou & Zifu Li & Chad Staddon & Xuejun Wu & Han Song, 2017. "Issues and challenges of reclaimed water usage: a case study of the dragon-shaped river in the Beijing Olympic Park," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(4), pages 486-494, May.
    3. Zeno F. Levy & Richard C. Smardon & James S. Bays & Daniel Meyer, 2014. "A Point Source of a Different Color: Identifying a Gap in United States Regulatory Policy for “Green” CSO Treatment Using Constructed Wetlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Michelle C. Hamilton & Shital A. Thekdi & Elisabeth M. Jenicek & Russell S. Harmon & Michael E. Goodsite & Michael P. Case & Christopher W. Karvetski & James H. Lambert, 2013. "Case studies of scenario analysis for adaptive management of natural resource and infrastructure systems," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 89-103, March.
    5. Sarah J. Tayouga & Sara A. Gagné, 2016. "The Socio-Ecological Factors that Influence the Adoption of Green Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-17, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nancy Kete & Giuliano Punzo & Igor Linkov, 2018. "Enhancing resilience within and between critical infrastructure systems," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 275-277, September.
    2. Agustina Apud & Robert Faggian & Victor Sposito & Diego Martino, 2020. "Suitability Analysis and Planning of Green Infrastructure in Montevideo, Uruguay," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Jozefína Pokrývková & Ľuboš Jurík & Lenka Lackóová & Klaudia Halászová & Richard Hanzlík & Mohammad Ebrahim Banihabib, 2021. "The Urban Environment Impact of Climate Change Study and Proposal of the City Micro-Environment Improvement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Siqi Yu & Xigang Zhu & Qian He, 2020. "An Assessment of Urban Park Access Using House-Level Data in Urban China: Through the Lens of Social Equity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Alexandra Jane Crossley & Alessio Russo, 2022. "Has the Pandemic Altered Public Perception of How Local Green Spaces Affect Quality of Life in the United Kingdom?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-14, June.
    6. Islam Alshafei & Pinar Ulucay Righelato, 2022. "The Human Ecosystem Spatial Networks of Amman City Center: A New Methodological Approach towards Resiliency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    7. Adriana A. Zuniga-Teran & Andrea K. Gerlak, 2019. "A Multidisciplinary Approach to Analyzing Questions of Justice Issues in Urban Greenspace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, May.
    8. Daniel Kozak & Hayley Henderson & Alejandro de Castro Mazarro & Demián Rotbart & Rodolfo Aradas, 2020. "Blue-Green Infrastructure (BGI) in Dense Urban Watersheds. The Case of the Medrano Stream Basin (MSB) in Buenos Aires," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-30, March.
    9. Peng, Panyu & Li, Mingyang & Ao, Yibin & Deng, Shulin & Martek, Igor, 2024. "Spatial-temporal evolution of driving mechanisms of city resilience: A Sichuan-based case study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jizhe Zhou & Quanhua Hou, 2021. "Complex Network-Based Research on the Resilience of Rural Settlements in Sanshui Watershed," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-26, October.
    2. Daniel Kozak & Hayley Henderson & Alejandro de Castro Mazarro & Demián Rotbart & Rodolfo Aradas, 2020. "Blue-Green Infrastructure (BGI) in Dense Urban Watersheds. The Case of the Medrano Stream Basin (MSB) in Buenos Aires," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-30, March.
    3. Machado, Ricardo A.S. & Oliveira, Anderson G. & Lois-González, Rubén C., 2019. "Urban ecological infrastructure: The importance of vegetation cover in the control of floods and landslides in Salvador / Bahia, Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    4. Thekdi, Shital A. & Lambert, James H., 2015. "Integrated risk management of safety and development on transportation corridors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1-12.
    5. Igor Linkov & James H. Lambert & Zachary A. Collier, 2014. "Introduction to the inaugural general issue of environment systems and decisions," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 367-368, September.
    6. Abhijit Paul & Paul F. Downton & Enoch Okoli & Jit K. Gupta & Mark Tirpak, 2014. "Does adding more lettuce make a hamburger truly green? A metaphor behind the green movement paradigm in designing cities," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 373-377, September.
    7. Hassler, Madison L. & Andrews, Daniel J. & Ezell, Barry C. & Polmateer, Thomas L. & Lambert, James H., 2020. "Multi-perspective scenario-based preferences in enterprise risk analysis of public safety wireless broadband network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    8. Megan C. Marcellin & Gigi Pavur & Davis C. Loose & John J. Cardenas & David Denehy & Mustafa Almashhadani & Saddam Q. Waheed & Benjamin D. Trump & Thomas L. Polmateer & Igor Linkov & Venkataraman Laks, 2024. "Systems analysis for energy assets of Iraq influenced by water scarcity," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 259-279, June.
    9. Shital A. Thekdi & Joost R. Santos, 2016. "Supply Chain Vulnerability Analysis Using Scenario‐Based Input‐Output Modeling: Application to Port Operations," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(5), pages 1025-1039, May.
    10. Hamilton, Michelle C. & Lambert, James H. & Connelly, Elizabeth B. & Barker, Kash, 2016. "Resilience analytics with disruption of preferences and lifecycle cost analysis for energy microgrids," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 11-21.
    11. Nathan James Bennett & Alin Kadfak & Philip Dearden, 2016. "Community-based scenario planning: a process for vulnerability analysis and adaptation planning to social–ecological change in coastal communities," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1771-1799, December.
    12. Luo, Xi & Li, Xuyong, 2018. "Using the EFDC model to evaluate the risks of eutrophication in an urban constructed pond from different water supply strategies," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 372(C), pages 1-11.
    13. Haowen You & Elizabeth B. Connelly & James H. Lambert & Andres F. Clarens, 2014. "Climate and other scenarios disrupt priorities in several management perspectives," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 540-554, December.
    14. Zwierzchowska, Iwona & Fagiewicz, Katarzyna & Poniży, Lidia & Lupa, Piotr & Mizgajski, Andrzej, 2019. "Introducing nature-based solutions into urban policy – facts and gaps. Case study of Poznań," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 161-175.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:38:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s10669-018-9702-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.