IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envsyd/v34y2014i3d10.1007_s10669-014-9516-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Introduction to the inaugural general issue of environment systems and decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Igor Linkov

    (US Army Engineer Research and Development Center)

  • James H. Lambert

    (University of Virginia)

  • Zachary A. Collier

    (US Army Engineer Research and Development Center)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Igor Linkov & James H. Lambert & Zachary A. Collier, 2014. "Introduction to the inaugural general issue of environment systems and decisions," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 367-368, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:34:y:2014:i:3:d:10.1007_s10669-014-9516-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10669-014-9516-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10669-014-9516-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10669-014-9516-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Igor Linkov & Cate Fox-Lent & Jeffrey Keisler & Stefano Della Sala & Jorg Sieweke, 2014. "Risk and resilience lessons from Venice," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 378-382, September.
    2. Abhijit Paul & Paul F. Downton & Enoch Okoli & Jit K. Gupta & Mark Tirpak, 2014. "Does adding more lettuce make a hamburger truly green? A metaphor behind the green movement paradigm in designing cities," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 373-377, September.
    3. Kirsti Russell Vastveit & Kerstin Eriksson & Ove Njå, 2014. "Critical reflections on municipal risk and vulnerability analyses as decision support tools: the role of regulation regimes," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 443-455, September.
    4. C. W. Mauelshagen & S. J. T. Pollard & D. Owen & S. Herndlhofer & P. Firth & J. McKenna & N. Bingley & P. Jenson, 2014. "Protecting asset value and driving performance with a dynamic, risk-based contingency fund," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 417-424, September.
    5. A. K. Gorai & Kanchan & A. Upadhyay & P. Goyal, 2014. "Design of fuzzy synthetic evaluation model for air quality assessment," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 456-469, September.
    6. C. Raina MacIntyre, 2014. "The discrepant epidemiology of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV)," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 383-390, September.
    7. Giuseppe Masetti & Brian Calder, 2014. "A risk index methodology for potentially polluting marine sites," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 391-405, September.
    8. Mihnea Birisan & Peter A. Beling, 2014. "A multi-instance learning approach to filtering images for presentation to analysts," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 406-416, September.
    9. Jeffrey Keisler & Igor Linkov, 2014. "Environment models and decisions," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 369-372, September.
    10. Kelly A. Burks-Copes & Gregory A. Kiker, 2014. "Uncovering lines of evidence hidden in complex problems: using conceptual models to inform ecosystem-based management of the Missouri River cottonwoods," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 425-442, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zoi Vrontisi & Ioannis Charalampidis & Ulrike Lehr & Mark Meyer & Leonidas Paroussos & Christian Lutz & Yen E. Lam-González & Anastasia Arabadzhyan & Matías M. González & Carmelo J. León, 2022. "Macroeconomic impacts of climate change on the Blue Economy sectors of southern European islands," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 170(3), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Bürgel, Tobias R. & Hiebl, Martin R.W. & Pielsticker, David I., 2023. "Digitalization and entrepreneurial firms' resilience to pandemic crises: Evidence from COVID-19 and the German Mittelstand," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    3. Xiaobing Yu & Chenliang Li & Hong Chen & Zhonghui Ji, 2020. "Evaluate Air Pollution by Promethee Ranking in Yangtze River Delta of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Amira Ghennaï & Said Madani & Carola Hein, 2023. "Evaluating the sustainability of scenarios for port city development with Boussole21 method," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 87-106, March.
    5. Xin Chen & Abrar A. Chughtai & Chandini R. MacIntyre, 2020. "Application of a Risk Analysis Tool to Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS‐CoV) Outbreak in Saudi Arabia," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(5), pages 915-925, May.
    6. Saarikoski, Heli & Mustajoki, Jyri & Hjerppe, Turo & Aapala, Kaisu, 2019. "Participatory multi-criteria decision analysis in valuing peatland ecosystem services—Trade-offs related to peat extraction vs. pristine peatlands in Southern Finland," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 17-28.
    7. Saarikoski, Heli & Mustajoki, Jyri & Barton, David N. & Geneletti, Davide & Langemeyer, Johannes & Gomez-Baggethun, Erik & Marttunen, Mika & Antunes, Paula & Keune, Hans & Santos, Rui, 2016. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Cost-Benefit Analysis: Comparing alternative frameworks for integrated valuation of ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(PB), pages 238-249.
    8. Chaodong Yan & Hongjun Dai & Wen Guo, 2017. "Evaluation of Ecological Environmental Quality in a Coal Mining Area by Modelling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-13, July.
    9. Bahaa Elboshy & Shinjiro Kanae & Mona Gamaleldin & Hany Ayad & Toshihiro Osaragi & Waleed Elbarki, 2019. "A framework for pluvial flood risk assessment in Alexandria considering the coping capacity," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 77-94, March.
    10. Milad Zamanifar & Timo Hartmann, 2021. "A prescriptive framework for recommending decision attributes of infrastructure disaster recovery problems," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 633-650, December.
    11. Horia-Nicolai L. Teodorescu, 2015. "Defining resilience using probabilistic event trees," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 279-290, June.
    12. Mika Marttunen & Jyri Mustajoki, 2018. "Use of Analyst-Generated Stakeholder Preference Profiles in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis — Experiences from an Urban Planning Case," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(03), pages 1-29, September.
    13. Mustajoki, Jyri & Saarikoski, Heli & Belton, Valerie & Hjerppe, Turo & Marttunen, Mika, 2020. "Utilizing ecosystem service classifications in multi-criteria decision analysis – Experiences of peat extraction case in Finland," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    14. Chad Staddon & Sarah Ward & Laura Vito & Adriana Zuniga-Teran & Andrea K. Gerlak & Yolandi Schoeman & Aimee Hart & Giles Booth, 2018. "Contributions of green infrastructure to enhancing urban resilience," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 330-338, September.
    15. Seth D. Baum & David C. Denkenberger & Joshua M. Pearce & Alan Robock & Richelle Winkler, 2015. "Resilience to global food supply catastrophes," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 301-313, June.
    16. Sushant K. Singh, 2017. "Conceptual framework of a cloud-based decision support system for arsenic health risk assessment," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 435-450, December.
    17. Marttunen, Mika & Belton, Valerie & Lienert, Judit, 2018. "Are objectives hierarchy related biases observed in practice? A meta-analysis of environmental and energy applications of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 178-194.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:34:y:2014:i:3:d:10.1007_s10669-014-9516-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.