IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v25y2023i9d10.1007_s10668-022-02468-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of factors influencing farmers’ sustainable environmental behavior in agriculture activities: integration of the planned behavior and the protection motivation theories

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Badsar

    (University of Zanjan)

  • Matin Moghim

    (University of Zanjan)

  • Mehdi Ghasemi

    (University of Zanjan)

Abstract

Unsustainable agricultural activities have made governments in developing countries confront numerous environmental challenges and crises in rural areas. The environmental problems of the agricultural sector, in addition to being affected by factors such as the economy and the specific characteristics of agricultural products, are also influenced by the individual and professional farmers’ behavior. The importance of farmer’s behavior in environmental concerns may be traced back to the effect and control which behavior has over other variables. However, the lack of appropriate environmental cognitive behavioral and socio-psychological models and poor understanding of factors influencing the environmental behavior of farmers, inhibit farmers from adopting pro-environmental behaviors in agricultural activities. As a result, the current study aimed to fill this gap by combining the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and the protection motivation theory (PMT) to identify the key predicting factors of farmers’ sustainable environmental behavior (SEB) and their behavioral intentions in various agricultural activities (such as agronomy, horticulture, livestock and natural resources).This research was a descriptive, causal and correlational study conducted through a cross-sectional survey of 300 farmers in Zanjan Province of Iran for which the structural equation modeling (SEM) technic has been utilized for analysis. The results indicated that the PMT variables, including self-efficacy, perceived vulnerability, and severity, response costs, and efficacy could significantly explain variability of farmers’ intention toward sustainable environmental behavior. Through adding the variables of TPB consisting attitude toward behavior, subject norm and perceived behavioral control increased the prediction variance of intention and behavior of farmers. Thus, the integrated model provides a better understanding of SEB, especially via the behavioral intention of farmers. The development of SEB in agricultural activities among farmers and their intention toward sustainable environmental behavior requires a comprehensive, systematic, and multidimensional approach such as the integrated model outlined in this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Badsar & Matin Moghim & Mehdi Ghasemi, 2023. "Analysis of factors influencing farmers’ sustainable environmental behavior in agriculture activities: integration of the planned behavior and the protection motivation theories," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 9903-9934, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:9:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02468-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-022-02468-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-022-02468-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-022-02468-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dalhaus, Tobias & Blanke, Michael M. & Bravin, Esther & Dietiker, Dominique & Finger, Robert, 2019. "Spring Frost in Apple Orchards: Quality Effects can Outweigh Quantity Effects," 2019 Annual Meeting, July 21-23, Atlanta, Georgia 291280, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Joost Buurman & Du Duong Bui & Le Thuy Tien Du, 2020. "Drought risk assessment in Vietnamese communities using household survey information," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 88-105, January.
    3. Octav-Ionut Macovei, 2015. "Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior in Predicting Proenvironmental Behaviour: The Case of Energy Conservation," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 11(4), pages 15-32, August.
    4. Fuller, Christie M. & Simmering, Marcia J. & Atinc, Guclu & Atinc, Yasemin & Babin, Barry J., 2016. "Common methods variance detection in business research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3192-3198.
    5. Fashogbon, A. & Mushunje, A., 2018. "Agriculture and Non-Agriculture Job Transitions in Nigeria: the Role of Information, Social Capital and individual characteristics," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 276028, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Floress, Kristin & Reimer, Adam & Thompson, Aaron & Burbach, Mark & Knutson, Cody & Prokopy, Linda & Ribaudo, Marc & Ulrich-Schad, Jessica, 2018. "Measuring farmer conservation behaviors: Challenges and best practices," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 414-418.
    7. Nicolás C. Bronfman & Pamela C. Cisternas & Esperanza López-Vázquez & Cristóbal De la Maza & Juan Carlos Oyanedel, 2015. "Understanding Attitudes and Pro-Environmental Behaviors in a Chilean Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-20, October.
    8. Piyapong Janmaimool, 2017. "Application of Protection Motivation Theory to Investigate Sustainable Waste Management Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Wei-Ta Fang & Eric Ng & Yong-Shen Zhan, 2018. "Determinants of Pro-Environmental Behavior among Young and Older Farmers in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, June.
    10. Nikolaos Satsios & Spyros Hadjidakis, 2018. "Applying the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) in Saving Behaviour of Pomak Households," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(2), pages 122-133, April.
    11. Henning Best, 2009. "Organic Farming as a Rational Choice," Rationality and Society, , vol. 21(2), pages 197-224, May.
    12. Yusuke Kuwayama & Alexandra Thompson & Richard Bernknopf & Benjamin Zaitchik & Peter Vail, 2019. "Estimating the Impact of Drought on Agriculture Using the U.S. Drought Monitor," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 101(1), pages 193-210.
    13. Paul, Justin & Modi, Ashwin & Patel, Jayesh, 2016. "Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 123-134.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naman Sreen & Swetarupa Chatterjee & Seema Bhardwaj & Asmita Chitnis, 2023. "Reasons and intuitions: extending behavioural reasoning theory to determine green purchase behavior," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 20(2), pages 447-475, June.
    2. Saeed Gholamrezai & Vahid Aliabadi & Pouria Ataei, 2021. "Understanding the pro-environmental behavior among green poultry farmers: Application of behavioral theories," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 16100-16118, November.
    3. Meiwen Guo & Liang Wu & Cheng Ling Tan & Jun-Hwa Cheah & Yuhanis Abdul Aziz & Jianping Peng & Chun-Hung Chiu & Rongwei Ren, 2023. "The impact of perceived risk of online takeout packaging and the moderating role of educational level," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Guang-Wen Zheng & Abu Bakkar Siddik & Mohammad Masukujjaman & Syed Shah Alam & Alvina Akter, 2020. "Perceived Environmental Responsibilities and Green Buying Behavior: The Mediating Effect of Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-27, December.
    5. Francesco Testa & Gaia Pretner & Roberta Iovino & Guia Bianchi & Sara Tessitore & Fabio Iraldo, 2021. "Drivers to green consumption: a systematic review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 4826-4880, April.
    6. Diana Puspita Sari & Nur Aini Masruroh & Anna Maria Sri Asih, 2021. "Consumer Intention to Participate in E-Waste Collection Programs: A Study of Smartphone Waste in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-28, March.
    7. Suk Min Pang & Booi Chen Tan & Teck Chai Lau, 2021. "Antecedents of Consumers’ Purchase Intention towards Organic Food: Integration of Theory of Planned Behavior and Protection Motivation Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Chandra Pant, Satish & Saxena, Raka & Gupta, N.K. & Yadav, Hema & Kumar AD, Sathyendra & Kumar Pant, Devesh, 2024. "The organic odyssey: Navigating the influence of attitude on purchase intent, mediated by perceived value, quality, and price in India," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    9. Lin Zhang & Liwen Chen & Zezhou Wu & Sizhen Zhang & Huanbin Song, 2018. "Investigating Young Consumers’ Purchasing Intention of Green Housing in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    10. Cortney Cowley & Jacob Dice & David Rodziewicz, 2023. "Drought and Cattle: Implications for Ranchers," Research Working Paper RWP 23-06, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
    11. KonShik Kim, 2023. "The impact of job quality on organizational commitment and job satisfaction: The moderating role of socioeconomic status," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 44(3), pages 773-797, August.
    12. Rambabu Lavuri & Abhinav Jindal & Umair Akram & Bhukya Koteswara Rao Naik & Alrence Santiago Halibas, 2023. "Exploring the antecedents of sustainable consumers' purchase intentions: Evidence from emerging countries," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 280-291, February.
    13. Alessandro Concari & Gerjo Kok & Pim Martens, 2020. "A Systematic Literature Review of Concepts and Factors Related to Pro-Environmental Consumer Behaviour in Relation to Waste Management Through an Interdisciplinary Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-50, May.
    14. Joey F George & Rui Chen & Lingyao Yuan, 2021. "Intent to purchase IoT home security devices: Fear vs privacy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-14, September.
    15. Chen, Jian-xun & Zhang, Bo & Zhan, Wu & Sharma, Piyush & Budhwar, Pawan & Tan, Hui, 2022. "Demystifying the non-linear effect of high commitment work systems (HCWS) on firms’ strategic intention of exploratory innovation: An extended resource-based view," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    16. Farida Saleem & Ahmad Adeel & Rizwan Ali & Shabir Hyder, 2018. "Intentions to adopt ecopreneurship: moderating role of collectivism and altruism," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(2), pages 517-537, December.
    17. Agus Sugiarto & Cheng-Wen Lee & Andrian Dolfriandra Huruta & Christine Dewi & Abbott Po Shun Chen, 2022. "Predictors of Pro-Environmental Intention and Behavior: A Perspective of Stimulus–Organism–Response Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-17, December.
    18. Wei Zheng & Hongliang Qiu & Alastair M. Morrison, 2023. "Applying a Combination of SEM and fsQCA to Predict Tourist Resource-Saving Behavioral Intentions in Rural Tourism: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-23, January.
    19. Hsu, Chia-Lin & Chang, Chi-Ya & Yansritakul, Chutinart, 2017. "Exploring purchase intention of green skincare products using the theory of planned behavior: Testing the moderating effects of country of origin and price sensitivity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 145-152.
    20. Elizabeth Sheedy & Patrick Garcia & Denise Jepsen, 2021. "The Role of Risk Climate and Ethical Self-interest Climate in Predicting Unethical Pro-organisational Behaviour," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(2), pages 281-300, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:9:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02468-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.