IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v24y2022i11d10.1007_s10668-021-01981-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A MCDM-based framework for the selection of renewable energy system simulation tool for teaching and learning at university level

Author

Listed:
  • Desmond Eseoghene Ighravwe

    (Bell University of Technology)

  • Moses Olubayo Babatunde

    (Tshwane University of Technology)

  • Thapelo Cornelius Mosetlhe

    (University of South Africa, Florida Campus)

  • Daniel Aikhuele

    (University of Port Harcourt)

  • Daniel Akinyele

    (Bell University of Technology)

Abstract

The calls for actions to combat climate change have resulted in renewable energy adoption and, consequently, an emerging renewable energy industry. Of course, this has also precipitated the need for more renewable energy expert grounded in hybrid renewable energy system (HRES) software to support the growing industry. Hence, selecting particular software for teaching renewable energy modules for the training of students at a university level is essential. The appraisal and selection of HRES sizing and optimisation software have become crucial for instructors and learners being prepared for the industry. This paper's central contribution is to provide academics, tutors, and researchers in the field of renewable energy system sizing with an idea on how to proficiently and effectively deploy multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches in HRES sizing and optimisation software selection problems. A framework that combines fuzzy entropy method and fuzzy-VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) was used to rank HRES simulation software. The performance of the framework was compared with that of the complex proportional assessment (COPRAS) method. The article observed a difference between the fuzzy VIKOR and COPRAS solution for ranking the most preferred software; the most preferred option using the Fuzzy VIKOR is the BCHP screening tool, and HOMER for the COPRAS method. They ranked the least preferred software as RETScreen (VIKOR method) and ORCED (COPRAS method).

Suggested Citation

  • Desmond Eseoghene Ighravwe & Moses Olubayo Babatunde & Thapelo Cornelius Mosetlhe & Daniel Aikhuele & Daniel Akinyele, 2022. "A MCDM-based framework for the selection of renewable energy system simulation tool for teaching and learning at university level," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 13035-13056, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:11:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01981-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01981-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-021-01981-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-021-01981-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zyadin, Anas & Puhakka, Antero & Ahponen, Pirkkoliisa & Pelkonen, Paavo, 2014. "Secondary school teachers' knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes toward renewable energy in Jordan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 341-348.
    2. Karabulut, Abdurrahman & Gedik, Engin & Keçebaş, Ali & Alkan, Mehmet Ali, 2011. "An investigation on renewable energy education at the university level in Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1293-1297.
    3. Zhou, Wei & Lou, Chengzhi & Li, Zhongshi & Lu, Lin & Yang, Hongxing, 2010. "Current status of research on optimum sizing of stand-alone hybrid solar-wind power generation systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 380-389, February.
    4. Monyei, C.G. & Adewumi, A.O., 2017. "Demand Side Management potentials for mitigating energy poverty in South Africa," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 298-311.
    5. Acikgoz, Caglayan, 2011. "Renewable energy education in Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 608-611.
    6. Çelikler, Dilek & Aksan, Zeynep, 2015. "The opinions of secondary school students in Turkey regarding renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 649-653.
    7. Yigit Kazancoglu & Serhat Burmaoglu, 2013. "ERP software selection with MCDM: application of TODIM method," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(4), pages 435-452.
    8. Assali, Alia & Khatib, Tamer & Najjar, Angham, 2019. "Renewable energy awareness among future generation of Palestine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 254-263.
    9. Connolly, D. & Lund, H. & Mathiesen, B.V. & Leahy, M., 2010. "A review of computer tools for analysing the integration of renewable energy into various energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(4), pages 1059-1082, April.
    10. Desmond Eseoghene Ighravwe & Sunday Ayoola Oke, 2019. "An integrated approach of SWARA and fuzzy COPRAS for maintenance technicians’ selection factors ranking," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(6), pages 1615-1626, December.
    11. Gelegenis, J.J. & Harris, D.J., 2014. "Undergraduate studies in energy education – A comparative study of Greek and British courses," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 349-352.
    12. Jennings, Philip, 2009. "New directions in renewable energy education," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 435-439.
    13. Wojuola, Rosemary N. & Alant, Busisiwe P., 2019. "Sustainable development and energy education in Nigeria," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1366-1374.
    14. Kaya, Tolga & Kahraman, Cengiz, 2010. "Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: The case of Istanbul," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 2517-2527.
    15. Kacan, Erkan, 2015. "Renewable energy awareness in vocational and technical education," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 126-134.
    16. Çakirlar Altuntaş, Esra & Turan, Salih Levent, 2018. "Awareness of secondary school students about renewable energy sources∗," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 741-748.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Das, Sayan & Dutta, Risav & De, Souvanik & De, Sudipta, 2024. "Review of multi-criteria decision-making for sustainable decentralized hybrid energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keramitsoglou, Kiriaki M., 2016. "Exploring adolescents’ knowledge, perceptions and attitudes towards Renewable Energy Sources: A colour choice approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1159-1169.
    2. Buldur, Serkan & Bursal, Murat & Yalcin Erik, Nazan & Yucel, Eren, 2020. "The impact of an outdoor education project on middle school students’ perceptions and awareness of the renewable energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    3. Assali, Alia & Khatib, Tamer & Najjar, Angham, 2019. "Renewable energy awareness among future generation of Palestine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 254-263.
    4. Tomasz Rokicki & Aleksandra Perkowska & Bogdan Klepacki & Hubert Szczepaniuk & Edyta Karolina Szczepaniuk & Stanisław Bereziński & Paulina Ziółkowska, 2020. "The Importance of Higher Education in the EU Countries in Achieving the Objectives of the Circular Economy in the Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Fahimul Hoque & Ruhizan M. Yasin & Kamaruzzaman Sopian, 2022. "Revisiting Education for Sustainable Development: Methods to Inspire Secondary School Students toward Renewable Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Guven, Gokhan & Sulun, Yusuf, 2017. "Pre-service teachers' knowledge and awareness about renewable energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 663-668.
    7. Kandpal, Tara C. & Broman, Lars, 2014. "Renewable energy education: A global status review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 300-324.
    8. Karatepe, Yelda & Neşe, Seçil Varbak & Keçebaş, Ali & Yumurtacı, Mehmet, 2012. "The levels of awareness about the renewable energy sources of university students in Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 174-179.
    9. Zyadin, Anas & Puhakka, Antero & Ahponen, Pirkkoliisa & Cronberg, Tarja & Pelkonen, Paavo, 2012. "School students' knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes toward renewable energy in Jordan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 78-85.
    10. San Martín, Idoia & Berrueta, Alberto & Sanchis, Pablo & Ursúa, Alfredo, 2018. "Methodology for sizing stand-alone hybrid systems: A case study of a traffic control system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 870-881.
    11. Li, Bei & Roche, Robin & Miraoui, Abdellatif, 2017. "Microgrid sizing with combined evolutionary algorithm and MILP unit commitment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 547-562.
    12. Desy Safitri & Fahrurrozi Fahrurrozi & Nina Nurhasanah & Arita Marini & Oman Unju Subandi & Shafruddin Tadjuddin & Murti Kusuma Wirasti & Irah Kasirah, 2022. "Effect of Eco-label and Renewable Energy Projects Knowledge on Environmental Awareness for Elementary School Students," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(3), pages 216-226, May.
    13. Sinha, Sunanda & Chandel, S.S., 2014. "Review of software tools for hybrid renewable energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 192-205.
    14. Upadhyay, Subho & Sharma, M.P., 2014. "A review on configurations, control and sizing methodologies of hybrid energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 47-63.
    15. Milad Kolagar & Seyed Mohammad Hassan Hosseini & Ramin Felegari & Parviz Fattahi, 2020. "Policy-making for renewable energy sources in search of sustainable development: a hybrid DEA-FBWM approach," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 485-509, December.
    16. Abbas Mardani & Ahmad Jusoh & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Zainab Khalifah, 2015. "Sustainable and Renewable Energy: An Overview of the Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Making Techniques and Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-38, October.
    17. Onar, Sezi Cevik & Oztaysi, Basar & Otay, İrem & Kahraman, Cengiz, 2015. "Multi-expert wind energy technology selection using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 274-285.
    18. Kyriakarakos, George & Patlitzianas, Konstantinos & Damasiotis, Markos & Papastefanakis, Dimitrios, 2014. "A fuzzy cognitive maps decision support system for renewables local planning," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 209-222.
    19. Dvořák, Petr & Martinát, Stanislav & der Horst, Dan Van & Frantál, Bohumil & Turečková, Kamila, 2017. "Renewable energy investment and job creation; a cross-sectoral assessment for the Czech Republic with reference to EU benchmarks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 360-368.
    20. Caballero, F. & Sauma, E. & Yanine, F., 2013. "Business optimal design of a grid-connected hybrid PV (photovoltaic)-wind energy system without energy storage for an Easter Island's block," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 248-261.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:11:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01981-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.