IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v23y2021i5d10.1007_s10668-020-00952-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling the effects of historical and future land use/land cover change dynamics on the hydrological response of Ashi watershed, northeastern China

Author

Listed:
  • Vitus Tankpa

    (Harbin Institute of Technology)

  • Li Wang

    (Harbin Institute of Technology)

  • Alfred Awotwi

    (CK Tedam University of Technology and Applied Science)

  • Leelamber Singh

    (National Institute of Technology)

  • Samit Thapa

    (Harbin Institute of Technology)

  • Raphael Ane Atanga

    (University of Johannesburg)

  • Xiaomeng Guo

    (Harbin Institute of Technology)

Abstract

The impact of anthropogenic activities in major river watersheds leading to alterations in the environment has triggered this study within the Ashi watershed of northeast China. Understanding individual land use/land cover (LULC) change contribution to watershed hydrology is vital for water resource planning, utilization of land resources and sustaining hydrological balance. This research investigates the influence of LULC alteration on the hydrology of the watershed from 1990 to 2014 and predicts LULC impacts on the hydrological components under different scenarios in 2030. Combined approach for Landsat images classification; Cellular-Automated (CA-Markov) for prediction and Soil and Water Assessment Tool were used. Partial least square regression (PLSR) model was applied to quantify the contribution of each LULC on hydrology. The results show that urban, water, agriculture, open canopy and other vegetation experienced an increment from 1990 to 2014. The predicted LULC for 2030 based on worst-case scenarios indicates urbanization and agriculture increase, while best-case scenario indicates a controlled expansion trend of urban and agriculture and regeneration of closed canopy. The changes in LULC increase stream flow (11.5%), surface runoff (86.6%), water yield (10.5%) but reduce lateral flow (64.9%), groundwater (27.9%) and ET (1%). Stream flow, water yield, surface runoff, lateral flow and evapotranspiration are expected to further increase under both scenarios, increasing more in the worst-case scenario. Urban, agriculture and close forest contributed in determining hydrological processes and are therefore chief environmental stressors in the Ashi watershed. This recommends regulating urban sprawl and agricultural activities to maintain hydrological balance. Graphic abstract

Suggested Citation

  • Vitus Tankpa & Li Wang & Alfred Awotwi & Leelamber Singh & Samit Thapa & Raphael Ane Atanga & Xiaomeng Guo, 2021. "Modeling the effects of historical and future land use/land cover change dynamics on the hydrological response of Ashi watershed, northeastern China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 7883-7912, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:23:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1007_s10668-020-00952-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-020-00952-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-020-00952-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-020-00952-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen Liping & Sun Yujun & Sajjad Saeed, 2018. "Monitoring and predicting land use and land cover changes using remote sensing and GIS techniques—A case study of a hilly area, Jiangle, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Monika Schaffner & Hans-Peter Bader & Ruth Scheidegger, 2011. "Modeling non-point source pollution from rice farming in the Thachin River Basin," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 403-422, April.
    3. Huiran Han & Chengfeng Yang & Jinping Song, 2015. "Scenario Simulation and the Prediction of Land Use and Land Cover Change in Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Ling Zhang & Zhuotong Nan & Yi Xu & Shuo Li, 2016. "Hydrological Impacts of Land Use Change and Climate Variability in the Headwater Region of the Heihe River Basin, Northwest China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-25, June.
    5. Akansha Kushwaha & Manoj Jain, 2013. "Hydrological Simulation in a Forest Dominated Watershed in Himalayan Region using SWAT Model," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(8), pages 3005-3023, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Harik, G. & Alameddine, I. & Zurayk, R. & El-Fadel, M., 2023. "Uncertainty in forecasting land cover land use at a watershed scale: Towards enhanced sustainable land management," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 486(C).
    2. Zaheer Abbas & Guang Yang & Yuanjun Zhong & Yaolong Zhao, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Change Analysis and Future Scenario of LULC Using the CA-ANN Approach: A Case Study of the Greater Bay Area, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-26, June.
    3. Youjung Kim & Galen Newman, 2019. "Climate Change Preparedness: Comparing Future Urban Growth and Flood Risk in Amsterdam and Houston," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, February.
    4. Juan Li & Xunzhou Chunyu & Feng Huang, 2022. "Land Use Pattern Changes and the Driving Forces in the Shiyang River Basin from 2000 to 2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-27, December.
    5. Yunfeng Hu & Batu Nacun, 2018. "An Analysis of Land-Use Change and Grassland Degradation from a Policy Perspective in Inner Mongolia, China, 1990–2015," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, November.
    6. Bernard Fosu Frimpong & Frank Molkenthin, 2021. "Tracking Urban Expansion Using Random Forests for the Classification of Landsat Imagery (1986–2015) and Predicting Urban/Built-Up Areas for 2025: A Study of the Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, January.
    7. Andrew Allan & Ali Soltani & Mohammad Hamed Abdi & Melika Zarei, 2022. "Driving Forces behind Land Use and Land Cover Change: A Systematic and Bibliometric Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Shaikh Shamim Hasan & Xiangzheng Deng & Zhihui Li & Dongdong Chen, 2017. "Projections of Future Land Use in Bangladesh under the Background of Baseline, Ecological Protection and Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-21, March.
    9. Michel Opelele Omeno & Ying Yu & Wenyi Fan & Tolerant Lubalega & Chen Chen & Claude Kachaka Sudi Kaiko, 2021. "Analysis of the Impact of Land-Use/Land-Cover Change on Land-Surface Temperature in the Villages within the Luki Biosphere Reserve," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-23, October.
    10. Hashem Dadashpoor & Hossein Panahi, 2021. "Exploring an integrated spatially model for land-use scenarios simulation in a metropolitan region," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(9), pages 13628-13649, September.
    11. Sarah Hasan & Wenzhong Shi & Xiaolin Zhu & Sawaid Abbas & Hafiz Usman Ahmed Khan, 2020. "Future Simulation of Land Use Changes in Rapidly Urbanizing South China Based on Land Change Modeler and Remote Sensing Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-24, May.
    12. Ying Li & Suiliang Huang, 2015. "Landscape Ecological Risk Responses to Land Use Change in the Luanhe River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-22, December.
    13. Liping Zhang & Shiwen Zhang & Yajie Huang & Meng Cao & Yuanfang Huang & Hongyan Zhang, 2016. "Exploring an Ecologically Sustainable Scheme for Landscape Restoration of Abandoned Mine Land: Scenario-Based Simulation Integrated Linear Programming and CLUE-S Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, March.
    14. Yipeng Zhang & Yunbing Gao & Bingbo Gao & Yuchun Pan & Mingyang Yan, 2015. "An Efficient Graph-based Method for Long-term Land-use Change Statistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Dawid Kudas & Agnieszka Wnęk & Ľubica Hudecová & Robert Fencik, 2024. "Spatial Diversity Changes in Land Use and Land Cover Mix in Central European Capitals and Their Commuting Zones from 2006 to 2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-16, March.
    16. Muluberhan Biedemariam & Emiru Birhane & Biadgilgn Demissie & Tewodros Tadesse & Girmay Gebresamuel & Solomon Habtu, 2022. "Ecosystem Service Values as Related to Land Use and Land Cover Changes in Ethiopia: A Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Xiaoli Hu & Xin Li & Ling Lu, 2018. "Modeling the Land Use Change in an Arid Oasis Constrained by Water Resources and Environmental Policy Change Using Cellular Automata Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.
    18. Fuli Wang & Wei Fu & Jiancheng Chen, 2022. "Spatial–Temporal Evolution of Ecosystem Service Value in Yunnan Based on Land Use," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, December.
    19. Yuepeng Liu & Chuanfeng Yang & Xinyang Yu & Mengwen Wang & Wei Qi, 2021. "Monitoring the Landscape Pattern and Characteristics of Non-Point Source Pollution in a Mountainous River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-15, October.
    20. Bhanage Vinayak & Han Soo Lee & Shirishkumar Gedem, 2021. "Prediction of Land Use and Land Cover Changes in Mumbai City, India, Using Remote Sensing Data and a Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network-Based Markov Chain Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:23:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1007_s10668-020-00952-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.