IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elmark/v32y2022i4d10.1007_s12525-022-00582-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Open government data: A systematic literature review of empirical research

Author

Listed:
  • Bernd W. Wirtz

    (German University of Administrative Science Speyer, Chair for Information & Communication Management)

  • Jan C. Weyerer

    (German University of Administrative Science Speyer, Chair for Information & Communication Management)

  • Marcel Becker

    (German University of Administrative Science Speyer, Chair for Information & Communication Management)

  • Wilhelm M. Müller

    (German University of Administrative Science Speyer, Chair for Information & Communication Management)

Abstract

Open government data (OGD) holds great potential for firms and the digital economy as a whole and has attracted increasing interest in research and practice in recent years. Governments and organizations worldwide are struggling in exploiting the full potential of OGD and require a comprehensive understanding of this phenomenon. Although scientific debates in OGD research are intense and heterogeneous, the field lacks theoretical integration of OGD topics and their systematic consideration in the context of the digital economy. In addition, OGD has been widely neglected by information systems (IS) research, which promises great potential for advancing our knowledge of the OGD concept and its role in the digital economy. To fill in this gap, this study conducts a systematic literature review of 169 empirical OGD studies. In doing so, we develop a theoretical review framework of Antecedents, Decisions, Outcomes (ADO) to unify and grasp the accumulating isolated evidence on OGD in context of the digital economy and provide a theory-informed research agenda to tap the potential of IS research for OGD. Our findings reveal six related key topic clusters of OGD research and substantial gaps, opening up prospective research avenues and particularly outlining how IS research can inform and advance OGD research.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernd W. Wirtz & Jan C. Weyerer & Marcel Becker & Wilhelm M. Müller, 2022. "Open government data: A systematic literature review of empirical research," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2381-2404, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:32:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s12525-022-00582-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s12525-022-00582-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12525-022-00582-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12525-022-00582-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin-Martin, Alberto & Orduna-Malea, Enrique & Harzing, Anne-Wil & Delgado López-Cózar, Emilio, 2017. "Can we use Google Scholar to identify highly-cited documents?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 152-163.
    2. Paul, Justin & Criado, Alex Rialp, 2020. "The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(4).
    3. Deo Donald Shao & Stuti Saxena, 2019. "Barriers to Open Government Data (OGD) initiative in Tanzania: Stakeholders’ perspectives," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 470-485, March.
    4. Bernd W. Wirtz & Jan C. Weyerer & Michael Rösch, 2018. "Citizen and Open Government: An Empirical Analysis of Antecedents of Open Government Data," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 308-320, March.
    5. Sanja Bogdanović-Dinić & Nataša Veljković & Leonid Stoimenov, 2014. "How Open Are Public Government Data? An Assessment of Seven Open Data Portals," Public Administration and Information Technology, in: Manuel Pedro Rodríguez-Bolívar (ed.), Measuring E-government Efficiency, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 25-44, Springer.
    6. Michael Gusenbauer, 2019. "Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(1), pages 177-214, January.
    7. Albert Meijer, 2015. "Government Transparency in Historical Perspective: From the Ancient Regime to Open Data in The Netherlands," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 189-199, February.
    8. Lim, Weng Marc & Yap, Sheau-Fen & Makkar, Marian, 2021. "Home sharing in marketing and tourism at a tipping point: What do we know, how do we know, and where should we be heading?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 534-566.
    9. Bernd W. Wirtz & Steven Birkmeyer, 2015. "Open Government: Origin, Development, and Conceptual Perspectives," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(5), pages 381-396, April.
    10. Justin Paul & Gabriel R. G. Benito, 2018. "A review of research on outward foreign direct investment from emerging countries, including China: what do we know, how do we know and where should we be heading?," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 90-115, January.
    11. Barbara Ubaldi, 2013. "Open Government Data: Towards Empirical Analysis of Open Government Data Initiatives," OECD Working Papers on Public Governance 22, OECD Publishing.
    12. Charalampos Alexopoulos & Euripidis Loukis & Spiros Mouzakitis & Michalis Petychakis & Yannis Charalabidis, 2018. "Analysing the Characteristics of Open Government Data Sources in Greece," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 9(3), pages 721-753, September.
    13. Ewen Callaway & Heidi Ledford & Giuliana Viglione & Traci Watson & Alexandra Witze, 2020. "COVID and 2020: An extraordinary year for science," Nature, Nature, vol. 588(7839), pages 550-552, December.
    14. Frantz Rowe, 2014. "What literature review is not: diversity, boundaries and recommendations," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 241-255, May.
    15. So Young Lee & José M. Díaz-Puente & Susana Martin, 2019. "The Contribution of Open Government to Prosperity of Society," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 144-157, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lim, Weng Marc & Rasul, Tareq, 2022. "Customer engagement and social media: Revisiting the past to inform the future," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 325-342.
    2. Mariasole Bannò & Emilia Filippi, 2024. "Women in top echelon positions and firm internationalisation strategies: What do we know? How do we know? Where should we be heading?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(4), pages 1257-1302, December.
    3. Elena Francke, Anna & Carrete, Lorena, 2023. "Consumer self-regulation: Looking back to look forward. A systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    4. Khlystova, Olena & Kalyuzhnova, Yelena & Belitski, Maksim, 2022. "The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the creative industries: A literature review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1192-1210.
    5. Tsiotsou, Rodoula H. & Boukis, Achilleas, 2022. "In-home service consumption: A systematic review, integrative framework and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 49-64.
    6. Varsha P S & Amrita Chakraborty & Arpan Kumar Kar, 2024. "How to Undertake an Impactful Literature Review: Understanding Review Approaches and Guidelines for High-impact Systematic Literature Reviews," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 13(1), pages 18-35, April.
    7. Lim, Weng Marc & Yap, Sheau-Fen & Makkar, Marian, 2021. "Home sharing in marketing and tourism at a tipping point: What do we know, how do we know, and where should we be heading?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 534-566.
    8. Bindra, Sunali & Sharma, Deepika & Parameswar, Nakul & Dhir, Sanjay & Paul, Justin, 2022. "Bandwagon effect revisited: A systematic review to develop future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 305-317.
    9. Buitrago R., Ricardo E. & Barbosa Camargo, María Inés, 2021. "Institutions, institutional quality, and international competitiveness: Review and examination of future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 423-435.
    10. Alvarez, Claudio & David, Meredith E. & George, Morris, 2023. "Types of Consumer-Brand Relationships: A systematic review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    11. Behl, Abhishek & Jayawardena, Nirma & Pereira, Vijay & Islam, Nazrul & Giudice, Manlio Del & Choudrie, Jyoti, 2022. "Gamification and e-learning for young learners: A systematic literature review, bibliometric analysis, and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    12. Baliga, Ashwin J. & Chawla, Vaibhav & Sunder M, Vijaya & Ganesh, L.S. & Sivakumaran, Bharadhwaj, 2021. "Service Failure and Recovery in B2B Markets – A Morphological Analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 763-781.
    13. Hosany, A. R. Shaheen & Hosany, Sameer & He, Hongwei, 2022. "Children sustainable behaviour: A review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 236-257.
    14. Jinhua Chu & You-Yu Dai & Anyuan Zhong, 2023. "Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Open Government Data Platforms: A Data Analysis of 61 Prefecture-Level Cities in China," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    15. Ishani Patharia & Tanu Jain, 2024. "Antecedents of Electronic Shopping Cart Abandonment during Online Purchase Process," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 12(3), pages 400-418, July.
    16. Vivek Kumar Singh & Satya Swarup Srichandan & Hiran H. Lathabai, 2022. "ResearchGate and Google Scholar: how much do they differ in publications, citations and different metrics and why?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(3), pages 1515-1542, March.
    17. Pedro Chapaval Pimentel & Mariana Bassi-Suter & Simone Regina Didonet, 2024. "Brand activism as a marketing strategy: an integrative framework and research agenda," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 31(2), pages 212-234, March.
    18. Andrea Pavón-Guinea & Mónica Codina, 2024. "Public diplomacy: a framework-based literature review and decentering research agenda," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(3), pages 255-274, September.
    19. Rashid Saeed, Muhammad & Khan, Huda & Lee, Richard & Lockshin, Larry & Bellman, Steven & Cohen, Justin & Yang, Song, 2024. "Construal level theory in advertising research: A systematic review and directions for future research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    20. Billore, Soniya & Anisimova, Tatiana, 2021. "Panic buying research: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Early Vie.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Open government data; Open data; Digital economy; Digital business; Literature review; Research agenda;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H1 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:32:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s12525-022-00582-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.