IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elcore/v24y2024i4d10.1007_s10660-022-09645-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the influencing mechanism of solvers’ participation behavior based on the WSR System Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Suying Gao

    (Hebei University of Technology)

  • Xiangshan Jin

    (Hebei University of Technology)

Abstract

As an innovative new model, emerging crowdsourcing has garnered significant user attention. We introduce the Wuli−Shili−Renli (WSR) approach and investigate the factors that affect solvers’ participation behavior to increase user stickiness. Using Python, we analyzed the task data of EPWK.com over the past 10 years to capture valid user data on the platform, finally obtaining 44,729 tasks through cleaning. Then, we performed regression analysis using ordinary least squares (OLS) and robustness testing using Poisson regression analysis. The findings revealed that the seeker’s experience and capability exerted a negative impact on the solvers’ participation number but a positive impact on the solvers’ overall capability. In addition, the seeker’s information disclosure exerted a moderating effect due to the auditing and trust effects. Besides, the task description and task salary had an inverted U-shaped effect on the solvers’ participation number, and the task salary had an inverted U-shaped effect on the solvers’ overall capability. The contributions of this study include expanding the theoretical application boundary of the WSR approach in the field of information management and providing suggestions for bilateral users and the interface design of the platform through the information disclosure strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Suying Gao & Xiangshan Jin, 2024. "Analysis of the influencing mechanism of solvers’ participation behavior based on the WSR System Approach," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 2209-2237, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:24:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10660-022-09645-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10660-022-09645-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10660-022-09645-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10660-022-09645-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Araz Taeihagh, 2017. "Crowdsourcing, Sharing Economies and Development," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 33(2), pages 191-222, June.
    2. Debaere, Steven & Coussement, Kristof & De Ruyck, Tom, 2018. "Multi-label classification of member participation in online innovation communities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 761-774.
    3. Yili Hong & Paul A. Pavlou, 2017. "On Buyer Selection of Service Providers in Online Outsourcing Platforms for IT Services," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 547-562, September.
    4. Wohlgemuth, Veit & Wenzel, Matthias & Berger, Elisabeth S.C. & Eisend, Martin, 2019. "Dynamic capabilities and employee participation: The role of trust and informal control," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 760-771.
    5. Paul A. Pavlou & David Gefen, 2004. "Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 37-59, March.
    6. Suying Gao & Xiangshan Jin & Ye Zhang, 2021. "User Participation Behavior in Crowdsourcing Platforms: Impact of Information Signaling Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    7. Eli M. Snir & Lorin M. Hitt, 2003. "Costly Bidding in Online Markets for IT Services," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(11), pages 1504-1520, November.
    8. Christian Terwiesch & Yi Xu, 2008. "Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(9), pages 1529-1543, September.
    9. Dominik Mahr & Aric Rindfleisch & Rebecca Slotegraaf, 2015. "Enhancing Crowdsourcing Success: the Role of Creative and Deliberate Problem-Solving Styles," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 2(3), pages 209-221, September.
    10. Antonio Moreno & Christian Terwiesch, 2014. "Doing Business with Strangers: Reputation in Online Service Marketplaces," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 865-886, December.
    11. Schenk, Eric & Guittard, Claude & Pénin, Julien, 2019. "Open or proprietary? Choosing the right crowdsourcing platform for innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 303-310.
    12. Steven Debaere & Kristof Coussement & Tom de Ruyck, 2018. "Multi-label classification of member participation in online innovation communities," Post-Print hal-02990807, HAL.
    13. Soudipta Chakraborty & Robert Swinney, 2021. "Signaling to the Crowd: Private Quality Information and Rewards-Based Crowdfunding," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 155-169, 1-2.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gordon Burtch & Yili Hong & Senthil Kumar, 2021. "When Does Dispute Resolution Substitute for a Reputation System? Empirical Evidence from a Service Procurement Platform," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(6), pages 1565-1582, June.
    2. Zhijuan Hong & Ruhai Wu & Yan Sun & Kunxiang Dong, 2020. "Buyer preferences for auction pricing rules in online outsourcing markets: fixed price vs. open price," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(1), pages 163-179, March.
    3. Yili Hong & Paul A. Pavlou, 2017. "On Buyer Selection of Service Providers in Online Outsourcing Platforms for IT Services," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 547-562, September.
    4. Chen Liang & Yili Hong & Pei-Yu Chen & Benjamin B. M. Shao, 2022. "The Screening Role of Design Parameters for Service Procurement Auctions in Online Service Outsourcing Platforms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1324-1343, December.
    5. Yili Hong & Chong (Alex) Wang & Paul A. Pavlou, 2016. "Comparing Open and Sealed Bid Auctions: Evidence from Online Labor Markets," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 49-69, March.
    6. Marios Kokkodis & Sam Ransbotham, 2023. "Learning to Successfully Hire in Online Labor Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(3), pages 1597-1614, March.
    7. Panos Constantinides & Ola Henfridsson & Geoffrey G. Parker, 2018. "Introduction—Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 381-400, June.
    8. Karl Taeuscher, 2019. "Uncertainty kills the long tail: demand concentration in peer-to-peer marketplaces," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(4), pages 649-660, December.
    9. Irfan Kanat & Yili Hong & T. S. Raghu, 2018. "Surviving in Global Online Labor Markets for IT Services: A Geo-Economic Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 893-909, December.
    10. Ni, Ji & Chen, Bowei & Allinson, Nigel M. & Ye, Xujiong, 2020. "A hybrid model for predicting human physical activity status from lifelogging data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(3), pages 532-542.
    11. Marios Kokkodis, 2023. "Adjusting Skillset Cohesion in Online Labor Markets: Reputation Gains and Opportunity Losses," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1245-1258, September.
    12. Koutroumpis, Pantelis & Leiponen, Aija & Thomas, Llewellyn D W, 2017. "The (Unfulfilled) Potential of Data Marketplaces," ETLA Working Papers 53, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    13. Tekic, Anja & Alfonzo Pacheco, Diana Vilma, 2024. "Contest design and solvers' engagement behaviour in crowdsourcing: The neo-configurational perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    14. Tedi Skiti & Xueming Luo & Zhijie Lin, 2022. "When More is Less: Quality and Variety Trade‐off in Sharing Economy Platforms," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(7), pages 1817-1838, November.
    15. Suying Gao & Xiangshan Jin & Ye Zhang, 2021. "User Participation Behavior in Crowdsourcing Platforms: Impact of Information Signaling Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    16. Jason Chan & Jing Wang, 2018. "Hiring Preferences in Online Labor Markets: Evidence of a Female Hiring Bias," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(7), pages 2973-2994, July.
    17. Gérard P. Cachon & Kaitlin M. Daniels & Ruben Lobel, 2017. "The Role of Surge Pricing on a Service Platform with Self-Scheduling Capacity," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 368-384, July.
    18. Pei‐Yu Chen & Paul Pavlou & Shinyi Wu & Yang Yang, 2021. "Attracting High‐Quality Contestants to Contest in the Context of Crowdsourcing Contest Platform," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(6), pages 1751-1771, June.
    19. Marios Kokkodis, 2021. "Dynamic, Multidimensional, and Skillset-Specific Reputation Systems for Online Work," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 688-712, September.
    20. Yao, Xinlin & Zhang, Peiran & Lu, Xianghua & Huang, Lihua, 2020. "Early or Late? Entry timing in online IT service markets and the moderating effects of market characteristics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 265-277.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:24:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10660-022-09645-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.